This will not solve any problem. If education is made mandatory, which in any case has been made via inclusion of education as “fundamental right” (if you would want to call your “fundamental right” mandatory), it will apply to an individual only and not to a school. The school shall still reserve the right to deny admission to a particular kid, if not for anything, then for capacity constraint. Also, since, demand far exceeds capacity, admission can’t be made mandatory. Let me explain by a stylized example.
Suppose within a community, there are 100 schools each with a capacity of 20 seats. Suppose, in any given year, there are 5000 kids who are eligible for admission. Suppose further, that this community is geographically restricted and secluded – no one can go out or come inside the community. Thus for 5000 kids, we have just 2000 seats. It means, 3000 kids can’t be admitted to school, in any given year. Mandatory admission will simply not work here – because of capacity constraints. In this case, however, education is also denied to the 3000 kids, in that given year. Now consider a single student, named X within that group of 5000 kids. If X is denied admission in 1 school, because of capacity constraint, he is not denied education, because with respect to him, there are 99 more schools to offer education. Therefore, unless he has been denied admission in all the schools, he can’t claim, that he has been denied education.
Your example is accepted. I took time to understand what I told earlier and found it impossible. Then, I realized that the problem you mentioned would only arise if the rule is implemented tomorrow. Means, without any survey, without evaluating the constraints. It would be like u get up in the morning and found that a new rule is implemented.
No, I'm not talking about that way. The problem statement of u requires some lengthy reply.
Here I begin:-
To implement that rule U first need to prepare a format for education.
1> Present avg. students in a school.
2> Ideal Student to teacher ratio.
3> As being a mandatory till XII, u need to reformat the syllabus to put things that are unavoidable in that duration.
Then
1> I propose a survey of present no. schools in a state. Divide them with district wise.
2> Get a no. eligible kids in that area.
3> Tally the student to school ratio.
4> Point out places with more school and less school and sort out schools having more attention than others.
5> Where there are less schools (1-2 schools per 3 villages), take opinion from local people if they would send their kids to most near-by school if its available. (This is required as some people would go by reputation rather communication problems). If 60% positive reply. Chalk out a plan for making a school having class I to X.
6> Schools where more students are admitted. Increase sections, i.e. if class V is now having 3 sections (V-A, V-B, and V-C of capacity 40 each) make two or three more (depending upon demand, again talk to school teachers). Improve infrastructure of that school to accommodate such huge no. of pupil. (ur question would be teachers? What about, now huge demand in "Para-Teachers", a few basic trg. schools are closed. Re-open them, train more, create more. MORE JOB opportunity)
7> For class XI to XII increase sections in existing schools or on demand it can be done in new schools too (mentioned in point 5)
Being a district wise activity it would be easier to track.
How did u like my plan??
Another thing I want to tell u that, in many threads u told u don't care what HCs think or cry about facilities given to SCs, LCs. You are not gonna pay any heed to them. They should suffer for what they had done earlier. This mindset is very dangerous.
It would create another problem. Suppose in near future getting so much pampered the SCs etc. switch role with HCs, i.e. now they are in power, they take decisions etc. and starts the same behavior to the HCs. Then an Ambedkar would again be wanted to ask equal right for the neglected ones. Its like revisiting the history with only diff. characters.
I can only compare the situation with the quarrel of a couple. It happens that for some reason the gal is very angry to her boyfriend. She is not even talking, listening to his prayers etc. Now the boy is trying very hard to clam her down. He does this so long that after a time he gets frustrated and becomes angry to his GF. Now the gal realizes her fault that for such a petty matter they were fighting and she had done wrong by ignoring him for such long time. Now its her turn to pacify her BF. She does everything to pacify him but now the BF reciprocates the same behavior to her. At last the gal gets angry again its now the boy's turn to pacify her.
R u getting me? its like switching roles only, but the main problem remains.
, which would IMO make this also useless. 
.