New Amd Processors

[Cool G5]

Seems VFM... I am expecting another stunner like hd48XX

 

[comp@ddict]

Well

48x0 kills GTX2x0
Deneb kills InTEL...hahahahahahahaha

 

[IronManForever]

^^^ The story will remain the same; just roles exchanged. Wel'll then be sympathising Intel and blaming AMD for monopoly and high price.

 

[comp@ddict]

Hmm letz not hope we'll be blaming AMD part comes true

 

[MetalheadGautham]

GPU - OK.
CPU - not so sure.

seriously guys, the day intel ditched netburst was the day amd stopped pwning intel and the boards reversed.

AMD, to survive, needs a brand new architecture designed from the scratch if they want to make a mark like they did with RV770.

 

[comp@ddict]

well, they were desperate for gfx break, and tada RV 770, hope tht comes true wid their proccs in the near or distant future

 

[MetalheadGautham]

Know what ? RV770 was completely redone from scratch.

But Phenom is an athlon derivative and Deneb is a phenom derivative.

Core2 and Nehalem are totally new architectures compared to NetBurst.

 

[4T7]

Know what ? RV770 was completely redone from scratch.

But Phenom is an athlon derivative and Deneb is a phenom derivative.

Core2 and Nehalem are totally new architectures compared to NetBurst.

That doesn't prove that Intel's architecture is superior and btw AMD has a lotta time to improve

 

[MetalheadGautham]

That doesn't prove that Intel's architecture is superior and btw AMD has a lotta time to improve

No, it does NOT prove that Intel's architecture is superior because at the end of the day, cost vs performance matters the most.

BUT, Nehalem is waaay ahead of Deneb technically speaking since . Meaning, if Intel finds a way to make Nehalem cheap, AMD is going to get PWNED.

How many of you are even sure that the CPUs really overclock that brilliantly as said ? Most of the time, the facts may be double the actual mark. Remember reviews that HD4870 could beat 9800GX2 when it was in its early days of discussion ? Well, it came close, but nowhere near beating.

 

[comp@ddict]

Well, INTEL won't be trying to find a way so long as ppl r gonna buy the better performing nehalem proccs

 

[ultimategpu]

GPU - OK.
CPU - not so sure.

seriously guys, the day intel ditched netburst was the day amd stopped pwning intel and the boards reversed.

AMD, to survive, needs a brand new architecture designed from the scratch if they want to make a mark like they did with RV770.

Actually the phenoms TLB error was one of the minus for AMD ------> As u think the INTELs very best pentium 4 was drastically beaten by the AMD athlon

for their glory days will come around 2009 .. AMD is going to launch two kind of proc

FX,deneb

 

[comp@ddict]

Guess what, the AMD proccs I mean the Phenom brand, it might change a.k.a rebranded. Read this:

*www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10080&Itemid=1