rajatGod512
N00B Troller
^127 hours was great ...
Must NOT Watch Movies Thread V1: Personal Opinions
R2K
In the Zone
In what way are they bad ?
All those movies keep viewers anxious till end about what is gonna happen next just within first 15 min.
Tarun Singh
Banned
Well whatever all you say,I didn't like it because nothing was good in that movie.It is my personal preference.You keep yours.
Yes I had 127 Hours but having just one look at it,I closed it.Surely not for me.
abhidev
Human Spambot
127 hours had funny scenes... Seriously???
abhidev
Human Spambot
What all was bad in the movie?
paulwalker10
Right off the assembly line
Pain and Gain............man it become pain in head man........really bad movie
abhidev
Human Spambot
paulwalker10
Right off the assembly line
yes.....the first movie that i cant bear for 1 hour............total **** for me......
10 numberi
Banned
Mishawr Rawhoshyo
Mishawr Rawhoshyo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fully avoidable.
1.Bad & clueless direction
2.Very very poor camera work.
3.Unfitting background music.
4.Bad use of veteran actor like rajit kapoor.
5. Bad to average screen play with only one or two good lines.
6.Supporting cast acting were poor to average.(Except for few experienced actors)
7.Prosenjit chatterjee had nothing much to do in the film. (So does most of the characters.Therefore acting was average to poor)
8.Involvement of unnecessary scenes to increase the movie length.
9. Unnecessary or indirect (Intentional or unintentional) gay romance.
10.Poor action sequences
I don't know which type of self proclaimed (pseudo) intellectual critics/people like this man's movies. The real mystery behind this film is how it managed to get fair ratings?This man should first learn direction well.
Mishawr Rawhoshyo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fully avoidable.
1.Bad & clueless direction
2.Very very poor camera work.
3.Unfitting background music.
4.Bad use of veteran actor like rajit kapoor.
5. Bad to average screen play with only one or two good lines.
6.Supporting cast acting were poor to average.(Except for few experienced actors)
7.Prosenjit chatterjee had nothing much to do in the film. (So does most of the characters.Therefore acting was average to poor)
8.Involvement of unnecessary scenes to increase the movie length.
9. Unnecessary or indirect (Intentional or unintentional) gay romance.
10.Poor action sequences
I don't know which type of self proclaimed (pseudo) intellectual critics/people like this man's movies. The real mystery behind this film is how it managed to get fair ratings?This man should first learn direction well.
I hadn't watched any trailers and only knew that this movie existed.
One day friend calls and asks to watch this movie, says that the focus is on teenagers. I thought, a movie on teenagers hmm must be interesting.
Yeah very interesting -_-