Microsoft offers $44.6 billion for Yahoo

Status
Not open for further replies.

shantanu

Technomancer
growing, wint M$ growing more and more everyday ?? every company grows. day by day..

and i said to @unknown to present the proof that M$ can be bought by FOSS.. is M$ in LOSS or FOSS has more money :D lol
 

Hitboxx

Juke Box Hero
Microsoft had it always easy of its business philosophy "Embrace, Extend and Extinguish" until now. Not anymore, regardless of Yahoo giving in or not, they just can't beat Google Inc.

I just hope Google doesn't turn out as bad as they are made out to be in the long run and doesn't go the Microsoft way. It is much more respected company and hope it stays like that.
 

shantanu

Technomancer
i meant , i asked ""The unknown"" in my previous post to put up a proof besied his sayign that FOSS can buy Microsoft ???
 

cvvikram

MVP in VC++
Just came across this news in CNN Money

*techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/02/01/271/

just an interesting read though...
 

techtronic

I Always Prefer 1080p
Well I certainly feel that it would be not worth an acquisition as Microsoft needs to improve Hotmail and Live Search.
It would be better if Microsoft acquires AMD instead.;)

 

vaithy

In the zone
yahoo soft may be in the future tense at present..but it offer some good opportunities for reducing piracy levels of Windows to some extent..Just consider the scenario. Some time in the near future you are trying to download a Yahoo application. But every time a window pops up asking you to validate your copy of the Microsoft Windows operating system as genuine. That is because big brother has just acquired Yahoo and everybody knows old habits die hard.

Consider you open a yahoo mail...after reading the contents of the loved one you are shocked to find the foot note from ,of course,l Mighty steve Ballmer himself pleaded with you, “ Dear customer! can you inform the sender of this e-mail to use only genuine Micro Soft products only.. Because the email is from the Pcrunning on pirated windows software”

On the other hand when you are seriously typing a webmail in yahoo , a message pop-up, Dear customers! it is time to check your OS geniune with Micorosoft web site..
Ofcourse You may be puzzled.. because you are not using Windows of any kind but using the GNU/Linux.. how come..?
Your query may return a sharp rebuke,
You know we have patents on Linux ..

Yahoo -Soft blue print is already hot discussion in many forums.even before Yahoo shareholders inked their approval...
Let us face the double barrell Shot-gun!!

Vaithy
 

anandk

Distinguished Member
It was always a matter of time, i guess! both ms and yahoo failed to make a mark in THIS segment, in spite of plenty $$ investments here ! yahoo was recently forced to lay off so many people ! ms is cash rich, and if these two come together, would make a strong No 2 to take on google !
 

praka123

left this forum longback
God grace!let google continue!we dont want M$haft monopoly with yahoo also :rolleyes:

M$ days are numbered.they did the biggest mistake of vista.now trying to buy yahoo?OHO!our M$ fanboys here used to show me screenshots of that cr#p called live.com(hotmail?) with lot of features which is sh!t for me :evil:

Biggest Lesson:No country will remain ruling others.the mighty hitler's germany came down!similarly the new monopolist and anit-competency expert and a shrewd fcuking business man called Bill gates's M$haft can not be here ruling for another decade.

times will come when his company's FUDing,Software Patents will backfire on M$haft :) I am expecting a co-allition of corps like IBM et al along with FOSS killing the biggest evil of 20&21st century called M$haft :rolleyes:

some other companies,may be it is google or who knows will kill the M$haft from its business eternally.this is nature's law.

I'd be the first one to post that news here about M$ liquidation :) Happy days with FOSS :)
 

mavihs

Techie By Heart
hey, don't want MS 2 buy Yahoo!!! Yahoo mail is much better then hotmail. i don't want 2 ruin it.
 

blackpearl

The Devil
Anybody reading praka's posts (in any thread) will think that Microsoft was directly resposnsible for his misfortune/failure. Honestly, how many of you were actually affected by Microsoft's policy or softwares? Tell me.

And this isn't the case with only Microsoft, this monopoly thing. Every big company enjoys monopoly of some sort. Do you know Reliance's Subhiksha stores are killing the small scale businessmen who sells vegetables and other consumer goods? Isn't that evil too? But do you care? No.
 

techtronic

I Always Prefer 1080p
@blackpearl - Well said

@praka123 - Buddy, first of all every company has its own share of killing its competitors, if you are so straight forward in pointing fingers at Microsoft, then Intel is far worse than Microsoft IMHO.Intel has killed AMD so as to say that the Chip competitor has suffered losses and was rumoured to be bought by several different companies like Samsung, nVIDIA and even Google.And by the way if you are still thinking that only M$ is in the DRM crap, don't forget that even Google is a member of TCPA which in future is planning to bring what is known as TPM or Trusted Platform Module.
Competition should be healthy for the end user to select from a variety of options. In this regard I need to stress that FOSS and Mac OS X have made Microsoft reduce their prices which I still think is costly
(Windows Vista Ultimate :mad:).
From M$ point of view, it needs to simplify its process of launching its versions of OS (Vista 5 Editions was a total misqueue).
I still feel XP's release was the best (Initially only 2 OS and then when there was a MCE requirement, they released MCE later)

 

praka123

left this forum longback
^u didnt get my point.there are lot of things which as a FOSS supporter I cannot get with M$haft.like the "get the facts" FUD,or sueing Linux via SCO Unix claiming codes or treating the user as slave with inbuilt DRMing of Vista and that goes on..Intel cannot come anyway near M$haft when it comes to trying to destroy Open Source Community and Linux esp via software Patent claims etc.

Even I am against these Hardware corps who are building DRM's inside their every product,be it a processor,hdd or whatever.this sucks!

and RIAAA the main losers who want to eat user rights!

I think this post will let know what I meant:
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=79403
My computer is mine. I didn’t license or borrow it from an OS vendor. I don’t want to ask permission to install or uninstall software on it, including the operating system. If I upgrade or swap out parts, I don’t have to justify it to anyone ( except maybe the Mrs. if it’s a bit pricey ).
^the first point being the most important one.
 
Last edited:

amitava82

MMO Addict
Google Offers to Help Yahoo
Thwart Microsoft Deal
The Wall Street Journal
Google Inc. Chief Executive Eric Schmidt called Yahoo Inc. CEO Jerry Yang to offer his company's help in any effort to thwart Microsoft Corp.'s unsolicited $44.6 billion bid for Yahoo, say people familiar with the matter.

The approach Friday from Google -- Microsoft's chief rival on the Internet -- came as Yahoo is assessing its options for responding to Microsoft's aggressive "bear hug" bid, which has sent aftershocks through the media and technology industries since its announcement Friday. People familiar with the matter say Yahoo's board of directors, which conferred by telephone Friday, hasn't taken a position so far and no rival bids have emerged yet, though it remains possible some will.

It's considered unlikely that Google would itself bid for Yahoo because of regulatory concerns related to their large shares of the search and online advertising markets. But the people familiar with the matter say Google could play a role in attempts by others to outbid Microsoft, or by Yahoo to remain independent. Google could potentially offer money, or guaranteed revenue in return for a Yahoo advertising outsourcing pact, under that scenario, say people familiar with the matter. Even such involvement by Google would likely attract antitrust scrutiny because of concerns that competition between the two Silicon Valley Internet companies could be reduced.

A Google spokesman declined to comment on any interest in Yahoo or contact between the two companies. Google in a blog post yesterday said Microsoft's pursuit of Yahoo "raises troubling questions" about whether it would give Microsoft too much power that could be abused. Microsoft responded by saying the deal would "create a more competitive marketplace by establishing a compelling No. 2 competitor for Internet search and online advertising."

One person familiar with the matter said that a number of technology, media and financial companies have since Friday discussed with Yahoo and its advisers their possible interest in participating in a bid for the company. But so far no serious rival bids have emerged from that, said people familiar with the matter.

Yahoo has said its board of directors would weigh the Microsoft offer and any alternatives, including keeping Yahoo independent, "and pursue the best course of action to maximize long-term value for shareholders." In a statement on its Web site, the company said "a review process like this is fluid, and it can take quite a bit of time."

Yahoo already had been in negotiations in recent weeks to outsource its Web-search advertising in Europe to Google, say people familiar with the matter. Since last year, investors have called for Yahoo to abandon its own search advertising system, which generates significantly less ad revenue for each consumer search, and use ads from Google in return for a majority share of the revenue.

The discussions with Google, which could potentially be a first step to a broader search-ad outsourcing deal, are expected to continue despite Microsoft's approach, says one of the people familiar with the matter. Another person said the two sides recently hit a disagreement on the revenue split between them.

Citigroup Global Markets analyst Mark Mahaney in a Friday research note estimated that Yahoo could boost its cash flow more than 25% annually by outsourcing all its search advertising to Google. Yahoo executives had considered such a maneuver as part of a strategic review last year, according to people familiar with the matter, but Mr. Yang in October had signaled that it had decided against it.

"We believe having a principal position in both search and display advertising is critical to creating... long-term shareholder value," Mr. Yang told analysts during Yahoo's earnings conference call in October. Yahoo's recent poor performance, including a sinking share price prior to Microsoft's bid and a tepid 2008 revenue outlook announced Tuesday, heightened calls for bolder moves by Mr. Yang, possibly spurring the change of heart toward Google.

Rival bids, including any with Google's support, could be crucial to efforts by Yahoo to at least secure a higher price for the company. Some investors believe Microsoft's offer of $31 per share -- a 62% premium to Yahoo's Thursday 4 p.m. trading on the Nasdaq -- is low, given that Yahoo shares traded at $33.63 as recently as Oct. 26.

In addition, they contend that the premium Microsoft is offering is insufficient because Yahoo holds cash and shares in publicly traded companies, including Yahoo Japan Corp. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., with a total market value of more than $12 per Yahoo share. "We've got a very fair offer in front of the Yahoo shareholders," said Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's chief executive, in an interview yesterday.

Google and Microsoft exchanged barbs yesterday related to that issue. Google Senior Vice President David Drummond in a blog post asked whether Microsoft could "now attempt to exert the same sort of inappropriate and illegal influence over the Internet that it did with the PC."

Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith responded in a statement that "The combination of Microsoft and Yahoo will create a more competitive marketplace by establishing a compelling No. 2 competitor for Internet search and online advertising." Mr. Smith added that "the alternative scenarios only lead to less competition on the Internet." (Read the statement.)

Google identified instant messaging and Web email accounts as areas where a Microsoft-Yahoo combination would have "an overwhelming" market share. In the blog post, Google also questioned whether Microsoft could use its "PC software monopoly to unfairly limit the ability of consumers to freely access competitors' email, [instant messaging] and Web-based services."

Microsoft had clearly identified competition from Google as a key reason behind its bid for Yahoo. In a letter to Yahoo's board making the offer on Thursday, Mr. Ballmer said the online advertising market is "increasingly dominated by one player," a reference to Google. "Together, Microsoft and Yahoo can offer competitive choice while better fulfilling the needs of customers and partners," he added. The two have been largely unsuccessful in their intensive efforts to narrow the gap with Google in Web-search market share and challenge its growing lead in Internet ad sales.
 

praka123

left this forum longback
^well done Google!ya all worth the salt! puke on M$haft! :twisted:

Oh God!I dont want to lend my yahoo id to be from M$haft :x
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom