Microsoft hobbles XP mini-notes with 1GB RAM limit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cyrus_the_virus

Unmountable Boot Volume
Redmond’s new XP mini-note licence dictates a 1GB memory limit to protect the high-profit position of Vista-powered notebooks


Bill Gates famously said that “640KB ought to be enough for anybody”, but his company has now decided 1GB is enough for XP – that is, if you’re running it on a mini-note.

As the new wave of mini-notes powered by Intel’s Atom processor starts to take off, bringing low-cost mobile computing to the mainstream, APCmag.com has learned that Microsoft is dictating that vendors limit their mini-notes to 1GB of RAM if they want to install XP.

The artificial memory ceiling is a condition of the OEM licence for Microsoft’s bespoke ‘netbook’ build of XP Home, which includes SP3, a pre-loaded copy of the Microsoft Works suite and links to Windows Live online services.

A high-level spokesperson at a mini-note vendor, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told APCmag.com “This is a licensing restriction on netbooks. It’s not a hardware limitation. This is to deliberately separate XP netbooks from Vista notebooks.”

APCmag.com has since learned that Acer has downgraded the memory specification on the Windows XP edition of its forthcoming Aspire One mini-note. A spokesperson confirmed to APCmag.com that the initial 1.5GB of RAM promised in its press release and Web site would be pared back to 1GB “due to XP restrictions”.

However, the Linux-powered model will retain its 512MB of RAM and the ability to be upgraded by Acer or a tech-savvy user to 1.5GB by dropping a 1GB chip into the mini-note’s on-board memory slot.

Buyers of Acer’s XP mini-note would obviously be able to do likewise, but the process necessitates removing the entire chassis (which can carry the subsequent risk of voiding your warranty). Unlike conventional laptops, mini-notes are not designed with end-user upgrades in mind. There’s usually no door for accessing the memory slot, and in many cases RAM is mounted directly on-board to speed up the production process and reduce costs.

It’s true that XP runs fine with 1GB of RAM, and mini-notes aren’t faced with hardware-intensive tasks such as playing DVDs or editing video. However, there’s no argument that with memory so cheap and the notebook industry starting to toggle to DD3 as part of the new Centrino 2 platform, there’s plenty of benefit – from a vendor’s competitive standpoint, as well as giving the user some extra overhead – to loading 1.5GB on deck.

Microsoft’s decision is also ironic, given that it needlessly cruels one of the last remaining outlets for the seven year-old old OS in a market where Linux already has its foot in the door. And Windows remains the OS of choice for vendors who want to give their mini-notes maximum mainstream appeal. Windows bestows an instant familiarity, as well as the ability for customers to install almost any of their current Windows program and have plenty of avenues for support should things go askew.

In an interview earlier this month with APCmag.com, speaking on the ‘Linux v Windows’ mini-note issue, Acer senior product manager Henry Lee said “The bulk of the requests and requirements we see in the marketplace are for the model with Windows rather than Linux”.

Source
So much so for consumer choice :lol:

Pathetic!

Typical examples of vendor lock-in :x and no surprise to find Microsoft at the Vendor end!
 

NucleusKore

TheSaint
Redmond’s new XP mini-note licence dictates a 1GB memory limit to protect the high-profit position of Vista-powered notebooks


Bill Gates famously said that “640KB ought to be enough for anybody”, but his company has now decided 1GB is enough for XP – that is, if you’re running it on a mini-note.

.............................

The artificial memory ceiling is a condition of the OEM licence for Microsoft’s bespoke ‘netbook’ build of XP Home, which includes SP3, a pre-loaded copy of the Microsoft Works suite and links to Windows Live online services.

A high-level spokesperson at a mini-note vendor, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told APCmag.com “This is a licensing restriction on netbooks. It’s not a hardware limitation. This is to deliberately separate XP netbooks from Vista notebooks.”

However, the Linux-powered model will retain its 512MB of RAM and the ability to be upgraded by Acer or a tech-savvy user to 1.5GB by dropping a 1GB chip into the mini-note’s on-board memory slot.

Source

Tomorrow they will tell you what colour underwear to wear with your notebook. This is the problem with monopolies.
 

gxsaurav

You gave been GXified
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.

They should bring the Origami UI to there netbooks running XP. Infact they should make the OS again for these only, slimming the requirment
 

amitava82

MMO Addict
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.
WTF? It's my laptop, It's my decision how much RAM I want. Cheap strategy to kill XP. Someone bring up the Hero Honda bike example please (the one you use for Mac OS)!
 

ray|raven

Think Zen.
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.

Just shows that you guys will just go on blatantly defending whatever Microsoft does.

Werent you there in the iPhone thread arguing against Apple's decision to decide what apps the users get to use?

Apple was 'restrictive' then, but Microsoft isnt now? Sheesh.
 

iMav

The Devil's Advocate
It's a business decision. Get over it. Don't buy the netbook. The company making the netbook entered a deal with Microsoft, those were the terms, if they didn't want these restrictions then they could have said no to Microsoft's XP, like that another company had done, XOPC or something. But, it was the makers of netbook that decided to go ahead with it. It is their fault, NOT Microsoft' fault.
 

lywyre

Cyborg Agent
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.

They should bring the Origami UI to there netbooks running XP. Infact they should make the OS again for these only, slimming the requirment

If you truly like windows, then you should not acknowledge this. It is the customer's choise how much RAM he wants to use. On the topic, though, this means that Microsoft acknowledges Vista is not good enough yet.
 

iMav

The Devil's Advocate
If you truly like windows, then you should not acknowledge this. It is the customer's choise how much RAM he wants to use. On the topic, though, this means that Microsoft acknowledges Vista is not good enough yet.
Microsoft got into the deal with the hardware makers, those were the terms. If they were not acceptable to the company that makes the laptops and will eventually sell it they could say NO. But, they didn't. IT IS THEIR FAULT! BLAME & BOYCOTT THE MAKERS OF THE LAPTOP NOT MICROSOFT!
 

FilledVoid

Who stole my Alpaca!
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.

They should bring the Origami UI to there netbooks running XP. Infact they should make the OS again for these only, slimming the requirment
Does McDonalds require you wear Polka dot trousers and yellow shirts while you stroll in their joint? Dude, whatever you are smoking please stop and then come back and post. You are such a hypocrite going apeshit over Apple posts but at the same time posting nothing that would distinguish your posts from garbage.

Microsoft got into the deal with the hardware makers, those were the terms. If they were not acceptable to the company that makes the laptops and will eventually sell it they could say NO. But, they didn't. IT IS THEIR FAULT! BLAME & BOYCOTT THE MAKERS OF THE LAPTOP NOT MICROSOFT!

In other words MS extorted it from them. Read the below again. If they wanted to use XP they need to follow the specifications. Not doing so would end up in either raising their products costs or having to move to another OS.

As the new wave of mini-notes powered by Intel’s Atom processor starts to take off, bringing low-cost mobile computing to the mainstream, APCmag.com has learned that Microsoft is dictating that vendors limit their mini-notes to 1GB of RAM if they want to install XP.
A high-level spokesperson at a mini-note vendor, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told APCmag.com “This is a licensing restriction on netbooks. It’s not a hardware limitation. This is to deliberately separate XP netbooks from Vista notebooks.”

I hope this Lame Marketing tactic blows up in their freaking faces and is classified as an EPIC FAIL.

It's a business decision. Get over it. Don't buy the netbook. The company making the netbook entered a deal with Microsoft, those were the terms, if they didn't want these restrictions then they could have said no to Microsoft's XP, like that another company had done, XOPC or something. But, it was the makers of netbook that decided to go ahead with it. It is their fault, NOT Microsoft' fault.
Yeah unfortunately with a majority of the market share that doesn't leave the companies with a hell alot of options now does it? In an extent I can now see why Prakash posts those links against MS.
 
Last edited:

gxsaurav

You gave been GXified
Restricting it in Windows XP Licensing agreement is wrong, but if we look at it over all it won't make any difference anyway. Get over it, stop cribbing
 

FilledVoid

Who stole my Alpaca!
Restricting it in Windows XP Licensing agreement is wrong, but if we look at it over all it won't make any difference anyway. Get over it, stop cribbing
We're not here trying to make a cure for cancer Einstein. We are posting our views. The one you posted earlier is flawed to the core. So go Cry me a river elsewhere.
 

iMav

The Devil's Advocate
In other words MS extorted it from them. Read the below again. If they wanted to use XP they need to follow the specifications. Not doing so would end up in either raising their products costs or having to move to another OS.
That's business 101. You want our product these are the terms. And as far as the links are concerned. Well ...
 

FilledVoid

Who stole my Alpaca!
That's business 101. You want our product these are the terms. And as far as the links are concerned. Well ...
Exactly what I'm trying to say. Its business nothing else than that. Could you not decipher that from the line which said.
I hope this Lame Marketing tactic blows up in their freaking faces and is classified as an EPIC FAIL.
I wouldn't disagree with this but what I would disagree with is lame statements like these.
What's the point of giving more RAM in netbook anyway? For the tasks a netbook is made, 1 GB RAM & XP r fine.
State the business motive instead of justifying with "Well 640 kb ought to be enough." catch lines. It didn't work then. It won't work now.
 

chandru.in

In the zone
Microsoft got into the deal with the hardware makers, those were the terms. If they were not acceptable to the company that makes the laptops and will eventually sell it they could say NO. But, they didn't. IT IS THEIR FAULT! BLAME & BOYCOTT THE MAKERS OF THE LAPTOP NOT MICROSOFT!
Ok. So according to MS lovers here, when Apple restricts apps on iPhone, Apple is to be blamed, not AT&T or Vodafone who distribute it. But Microsoft puts in stupid restrictions, suddenly Dell and other OEMs should be blamed and not Microsoft.

My Opinion: Both Apple and Microsoft create stupid restrictions to choke consumer choice. Nothing new here. If Microsoft does not pose such restrictions, XP will live for too long and destroy Microsoft's further lock-in plans with Vista.
 

narangz

Web developer
Just shows that you guys will just go on blatantly defending whatever Microsoft does.

Werent you there in the iPhone thread arguing against Apple's decision to decide what apps the users get to use?

Apple was 'restrictive' then, but Microsoft isnt now? Sheesh.

+1

Why oh why Ballmer is ruining this company :(
 

iMav

The Devil's Advocate
Apple is to be blamed, not AT&T or Vodafone who distribute it. But Microsoft puts in stupid restrictions, suddenly Dell and other OEMs should be blamed and not Microsoft.
Dude! There is something called as rationality, look around you might find it under the table! Microsoft does not make the laptop they provide the software to make those otherwise pieces of junk to work. It is their product they have the right to negotiate possible options to improve their business and such moves are part of those, if Dell or HP or netbook do not like it, go use something else. Why blame Microsoft? And who would blame AT&T or Vodafone for App store terms :confused: Are you high or something?
 

Faun

Wahahaha~!
Staff member
lolz...we are not dumb and don't want to see a restricted world too.

Look how win live for PC went free ! Why ? Cuz the consumers vowed to make a remark over it.
Developers started shifting to steam. MS was in deep trouble then :rolleyes:

Its the "we" that make a difference :!:
 

narangz

Web developer
Microsoft does not make the laptop they provide the software to make those otherwise pieces of junk to work.

Why are they imposing such terms then? They aren't only providing software they are also trying to control the use of hardware in the device.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom