Intel's Next Desktop Launch Details Revealed

Status
Not open for further replies.

kirangp

The joy Of Wow
I think AMD should really come out with a very good processor within that time otherwise as the previous year Intel will rule the markets again...I dont think AMD considers India as a very good market,otherwise no other reason for NO ADS POLICY in India..Only people who have idea about AMD buy it otherwise they are still in Baba Azam zamaana thinking that AMD processor is a nuclear bomb whereas Intel processor is summer of Delhi( I have seen many people thinking like that)
 

Pathik

Google Bot
kirangp said:
Only people who have idea about AMD buy it otherwise they are still in Baba Azam zamaana thinking that AMD processor is a nuclear bomb whereas Intel processor is summer of Delhi( I have seen many people thinking like that)
wat did that mean??
 

kirangp

The joy Of Wow
pathiks said:
wat did that mean??

It means that AMD processors still are very hot & crash systems( nuclear bomb) while Intel processors are cool(Delhi summers are tolerable compared to nuclear bombs)...I have seen dealers in SP Road Bangalore say like that to a customer recently
 
OP
Ankur Gupta

Ankur Gupta

Wandering in time...
^^Oh common man...its time for you to search which processors run cooler...
AMD are the coolest desktop processors....you have got in totally wrong...
 

gxsaurav

You gave been GXified
Core 2 Duo runs cooler then AMD Athlon64 which runs cooler then Pentium D (Presshot core :D)

But really, AMD needs to do some marketing else they are screwed. They should also look at other markets while Via is ruling, like UPMC, Phone, PDA etc.
 

blackpearl

The Devil
AMD has a very stupid marketing department. I wouldn't be surprised if I hear they don't even have a marketing dept :p How can they ignore something like marketing? Look at Intel, everywhere you look there is Intel ads. You open the newspapaer in the morning and you are greeted with big Intel ads. You will find Intel ads in tech magazines, sports mag and even women's mag. You go out and you see huge Intel hoardings on the streets. You switch on the tv and you see Intel ads in between sports, movies, news and even saas bahu serials!!

Now if such a person who has been exposed to Intel ads every day of his life decides to buy a PC, will he walk into a store and pick up AMD? Certainly not. He might have not even heard of AMD if he is an average non-tech person. Even if he has, most likely he has heard it badly. Actually AMD made a very bad entry into the processor business with its AthlonXPs. That hurt its business very badly and is hurting even now, thanks to their no-ads policy.

I'm not a AMD fan but their stupidity baffles me.
 

Pathik

Google Bot
amd relies more on word of mouth rather than ads... Wich seemed to work earlier.. But since c2d evything has changed..
 

clmlbx

Technomancer
thanks for the info

Is it launched ?

when is going to launch in india ?

will it be available in next 2 months ??

will indian price be same as given ?

as I am going to assemble new computer in next two months ..
 

abhi1301

gEttIn 0uT@@@ BOXX
me NOt attracted want AMD product
__________
@ blackpearl
"Actually AMD made a very bad entry into the processor business with its AthlonXPs."

Dude FYI AMD made entries wid k3 processors bak in late 90.s
 
Last edited:

kirangp

The joy Of Wow
ankurgupta.me said:
^^Oh common man...its time for you to search which processors run cooler...
AMD are the coolest desktop processors....you have got in totally wrong...


who told ya...as saurav said it...core 2 duo are coolest rite now...and I knew b4 that Athlon FX processors were cooler than intel counter parts...I am talkin about bhola bhaala public man
 

darklord

Cyborg Agent
kirangp said:
who told ya...as saurav said it...core 2 duo are coolest rite now...and I knew b4 that Athlon FX processors were cooler than intel counter parts...I am talkin about bhola bhaala public man

C2D the coolest ? Maybe you are not aware of or heard about 'Brisbane' ,have you ?
 

kirangp

The joy Of Wow
I have heard of Brisbane...and no it is not the coolest...maybe it might be cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working...and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME...and it doesnt break any strides while working also..it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm...here is a good comparison
*xtreview.com/review166.htm
 
Last edited:

goobimama

 Macboy
Brisbane ain't not cool. Its Chili. And Chili ain't never been cool...

But what I am arguing here? I'm living with a Pentium 4 Prescott! Whines every time I play a High Definition...
 
OP
Ankur Gupta

Ankur Gupta

Wandering in time...
kirangp said:
who told ya...as saurav said it...core 2 duo are coolest rite now...and I knew b4 that Athlon FX processors were cooler than intel counter parts...I am talkin about bhola bhaala public man

I was not comparing AMD64 processors with the C2Ds but with Pentium4 and PentiumD processors which still are selling like hot cakes in the indian market..
The comparison with C2D can be done when AMD brings out their counterparts.
 

darklord

Cyborg Agent
kirangp said:
I have heard of Brisbane...and no it is not the coolest...maybe it might be cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working...and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME...and it doesnt break any strides while working also..it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm...here is a good comparison
*xtreview.com/review166.htm

cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working-----> Whats that supposed to mean ? are you trying to say the CPU shuts itself up or something when idle or what ?

and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME----> Are you saying C2D is ultra cool @ Full Load ? ,tell me one thing, have you ever actually USED a C2D ?

it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm-----> Rip off ???? Dude do you even know what you are talking about ? Its a die shrink,when did anyone claim it to be something groudbreaking ? Get your facts right.

BTW the link you gave does not work for me ;)

Here's a link for the Brisbane from a WELL KNOWN site unlike yours, Anandtech Brisbane Review

Here's where the temps are shown UNDER LOAD,if thats what you were boasting of - Temp Comparison
 
Last edited:

kirangp

The joy Of Wow
darklord said:
cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working-----> Whats that supposed to mean ? are you trying to say the CPU shuts itself up or something when idle or what ?
-------It means the heat dissipated by AMD Brisbane when processor is idle is less than Core 2 duo
& when at full load c2d is cooler compared to brisbane...

darklord said:
and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME----> Are you saying C2D is ultra cool @ Full Load ?
----------explained above and I never said c2d as ultra cool...I just told it is coolest among the processors available now if u read my previous post

darklord said:
tell me one thing, have you ever actually USED a C2D ?
-------------Nope I havent used it but I have kept a tab on its working & stuff by browsing through articles

darklord said:
it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm-----> Rip off ???? Dude do you even know what you are talking about ? Its a die shrink,when did anyone claim it to be something groudbreaking ? Get your facts right.
---------------Do you even know what the windsor core is??I have my facts right....Brisbane is just (90nm Windsor core)'s 65 nm processor with some little bit changes here & there...

darklord said:
BTW the link you gave does not work for me ;)
-------------- have read it many times & it has worked for me all the time

darklord said:
Here's a link for the Brisbane from a WELL KNOWN site unlike yours, Anandtech Brisbane Review
---------------And here is ur reliable anandtech's quote in first page itself

"Transistor count remains unchanged at 154M as there is no new functionality or cache introduced with the move to 65nm. Once again, we will have to wait until around the middle of 2007 before we'll see any major changes to AMD's architecture."
Plz read properly before quoting

darklord said:
Here's where the temps are shown UNDER LOAD,if thats what you were boasting of - Temp Comparison

Well well cant say much because in my site they have shown as Intel beating AMD...and anandtech has quoted "While it's not necessarily useful (or accurate) to compare readings across two different motherboards"...so this cant be concluded...
__________
ankurgupta.me said:
I was not comparing AMD64 processors with the C2Ds but with Pentium4 and PentiumD processors which still are selling like hot cakes in the indian market..
The comparison with C2D can be done when AMD brings out their counterparts.

Well what you are telling is true...Athlon 64s were the coolest when compared with Intel p4 & pD and even Prescott too..Intel had a hard time at that time
 
Last edited:

darklord

Cyborg Agent
It means the heat dissipated by AMD Brisbane when processor is idle is less than Core 2 duo
& when at full load c2d is cooler compared to brisbane...

I guess the Anandtech link proves your statement WRONG.


I just told it is coolest among the processors available now if u read my previous post
No its not

Nope I havent used it but I have kept a tab on its working & stuff by browsing through articles
Lol i guess hands on experience is better than reading articles.....;)

Do you even know what the windsor core is??I have my facts right....Brisbane is just (90nm Windsor core)'s 65 nm processor with some little bit changes here & there...
Hmmm looks like you know a whole lot more,good for you.Looks like you have problem understanding english, do you know what a die shrink means ? READ my post carefully and then reply back.
Since you seem to know sooo much,care to explain what are these so called 'Little bit changes here n there ' ????

have read it many times & it has worked for me all the time
Finally your link opened for me.Which site is that ? never heard of it. :S

---------------And here is ur reliable anandtech's quote in first page itself

"Transistor count remains unchanged at 154M as there is no new functionality or cache introduced with the move to 65nm. Once again, we will have to wait until around the middle of 2007 before we'll see any major changes to AMD's architecture."
Plz read properly before quoting
ROFL, i had given the link so you could go through the entire article.God knows what you thought :p

Well well cant say much because in my site they have shown as Intel beating AMD...and anandtech has quoted "While it's not necessarily useful (or accurate) to compare readings across two different motherboards"...so this cant be concluded...
Oooohhh so now YOUR site is more RELIABLE than Anandtech.....RRRIIGHHHT !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom