sms_solver
In the zone
now price are droping down, i think i should buy C2D by Mar 2008
sms_solver said:now price are droping down, i think i should buy C2D by Mar 2008
wat did that mean??kirangp said:Only people who have idea about AMD buy it otherwise they are still in Baba Azam zamaana thinking that AMD processor is a nuclear bomb whereas Intel processor is summer of Delhi( I have seen many people thinking like that)
pathiks said:wat did that mean??
ankurgupta.me said:^^Oh common man...its time for you to search which processors run cooler...
AMD are the coolest desktop processors....you have got in totally wrong...
kirangp said:who told ya...as saurav said it...core 2 duo are coolest rite now...and I knew b4 that Athlon FX processors were cooler than intel counter parts...I am talkin about bhola bhaala public man
kirangp said:who told ya...as saurav said it...core 2 duo are coolest rite now...and I knew b4 that Athlon FX processors were cooler than intel counter parts...I am talkin about bhola bhaala public man
kirangp said:I have heard of Brisbane...and no it is not the coolest...maybe it might be cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working...and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME...and it doesnt break any strides while working also..it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm...here is a good comparison
*xtreview.com/review166.htm
-------It means the heat dissipated by AMD Brisbane when processor is idle is less than Core 2 duodarklord said:cooler than core 2 duo when idle but it is not at all cool when working-----> Whats that supposed to mean ? are you trying to say the CPU shuts itself up or something when idle or what ?
----------explained above and I never said c2d as ultra cool...I just told it is coolest among the processors available now if u read my previous postdarklord said:and thats what we want COOLER WHEN WORKING NOT IDLE TIME----> Are you saying C2D is ultra cool @ Full Load ?
-------------Nope I havent used it but I have kept a tab on its working & stuff by browsing through articlesdarklord said:tell me one thing, have you ever actually USED a C2D ?
---------------Do you even know what the windsor core is??I have my facts right....Brisbane is just (90nm Windsor core)'s 65 nm processor with some little bit changes here & there...darklord said:it is just a rip off of Windsor core but only 65 nm-----> Rip off ???? Dude do you even know what you are talking about ? Its a die shrink,when did anyone claim it to be something groudbreaking ? Get your facts right.
-------------- have read it many times & it has worked for me all the timedarklord said:BTW the link you gave does not work for me
---------------And here is ur reliable anandtech's quote in first page itselfdarklord said:Here's a link for the Brisbane from a WELL KNOWN site unlike yours, Anandtech Brisbane Review
darklord said:Here's where the temps are shown UNDER LOAD,if thats what you were boasting of - Temp Comparison
ankurgupta.me said:I was not comparing AMD64 processors with the C2Ds but with Pentium4 and PentiumD processors which still are selling like hot cakes in the indian market..
The comparison with C2D can be done when AMD brings out their counterparts.
It means the heat dissipated by AMD Brisbane when processor is idle is less than Core 2 duo
& when at full load c2d is cooler compared to brisbane...
No its notI just told it is coolest among the processors available now if u read my previous post
Lol i guess hands on experience is better than reading articles.....Nope I havent used it but I have kept a tab on its working & stuff by browsing through articles
Hmmm looks like you know a whole lot more,good for you.Looks like you have problem understanding english, do you know what a die shrink means ? READ my post carefully and then reply back.Do you even know what the windsor core is??I have my facts right....Brisbane is just (90nm Windsor core)'s 65 nm processor with some little bit changes here & there...
Finally your link opened for me.Which site is that ? never heard of it. :Shave read it many times & it has worked for me all the time
ROFL, i had given the link so you could go through the entire article.God knows what you thought---------------And here is ur reliable anandtech's quote in first page itself
"Transistor count remains unchanged at 154M as there is no new functionality or cache introduced with the move to 65nm. Once again, we will have to wait until around the middle of 2007 before we'll see any major changes to AMD's architecture."
Plz read properly before quoting
Oooohhh so now YOUR site is more RELIABLE than Anandtech.....RRRIIGHHHT !Well well cant say much because in my site they have shown as Intel beating AMD...and anandtech has quoted "While it's not necessarily useful (or accurate) to compare readings across two different motherboards"...so this cant be concluded...