Help needed with Personal Website and Blog Designing

Status
Not open for further replies.

goobimama

 Macboy
Wordpress installation instructions are nicely laid out on the Wordpress.org site. Very easy to follow.

(Addicted is spelt with two Ds....)
 
Last edited:

ravi_9793

TechTin.com
yes..installation using fantastico is very easy. Just a 2 min process. But your host should provide this feature.
 
It's easy. Just buy a hosting, then goto the Fantastico and install WP. Just a single click will install WP.
OK, I got my money ready for hosting and will soon buy it.
But can I install wordpress within a website ?
I am planning to make my blog in the format www . blogname . mysite . in
Is it possible if I use my own domain name ?
I want to install wordpress right inside that particular sub domain.
 
as said by ashok, more traffic more bandwidth. To save bandwidth use less multimedia on your site.
what about hosting all multimedia on media hosting sites like imageshack ?
the problem is that I have gone for a 3gb per month scheme, and looking at the extremely light chotocheeta.com's bandwidth consuption of 8gb per month makes me scared.
 
build a site that does not "prefer" IE :rolleyes:
*www.anybrowser.org/campaign/
don't say things that are tooo darn obvious.
what else do you expect me to do ?
my site will have the following logos :

1. Best Viewed with Firefox logo

2. Powered by Linux logo

3. Switch to linux and experience the WoW logo

4. Powered by WordPress Logo

5. GetFlash and GetGnash logo

6. Get VLC Plugin logo

7. Webhoster's powered by logo

and what you said is the top one :lol:
 
^How abt the spoof that sabayon guys tried sometime back.
"Cannot be viewed with I.E" :p
is that page still active ? atleast a screenshot ? it sounds terribly funny to me :lol:
although on a serious note, such sites ARE possible. many sites don't render well on IE7.
^ROFL!seems gautham will make IE gys sweat:D
I just want my site to be compatible with the following browsers:

1. Mozilla Firefox
2. Opera
3. Konqueror
4. Opera Mini
5. Android Browser
6. The browser thingy that powers Damn Small Linux and Fluxbuntu

if I make a site thats compatible with the first three, there is no reason why it should not run on IE and Safari(afterall, safari is the son of Konqueror.)
 

ray|raven

Think Zen.
is that page still active ? atleast a screenshot ? it sounds terribly funny to me :lol:
although on a serious note, such sites ARE possible. many sites don't render well on IE7.

It's not there anymore, sometime back, there used to be a statement saying something in the lines of
"This site doesnt work with internet explorer 6.
We dont even care if it works with IE 7.
Go get firefox or smthing else.
And how can you even live in a world without tabs, you're insane"

The last line is exactly the same , i think , i remember it coz it was so friggin' hilarious.

if I make a site thats compatible with the first three, there is no reason why it should not run on IE and Safari(afterall, safari is the son of Konqueror.)
My Dear boy, you dont know IE well enough :p
 

nileshgr

Wise Old Owl
you can categorise posts in your blogger blog

i done that for my blog

Argh! what an overloaded blog. Takes a gr8 amount of CPU. Trim it dude. you'll lose visitors. don't have more than 7 posts on the main page.

is that page still active ? atleast a screenshot ? it sounds terribly funny to me :lol:
although on a serious note, such sites ARE possible. many sites don't render well on IE7.

I just want my site to be compatible with the following browsers:

1. Mozilla Firefox
2. Opera
3. Konqueror
4. Opera Mini
5. Android Browser
6. The browser thingy that powers Damn Small Linux and Fluxbuntu

if I make a site thats compatible with the first three, there is no reason why it should not run on IE and Safari(afterall, safari is the son of Konqueror.)


if you want to power your site with AJAX which changes the page without reloading it; then your site will be compatible with -

Firefox, Opera, Netscape 7+, IE, Safari.

in AJAX except for IE, the XmlHttp request object method is same. Now in IE, its different on different versions.

More about ajax - www.w3schools.com/ajax/
 
Last edited:

praka123

left this forum longback
@ray:
here is one site I found which says "This site is NOT DESIGNED for use with INTERNET EXPLORER."
try with IE(I dont have!) to be sure:
*www.crimsonreavers.com/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom