Hardware price list/spec sheet

[topgear]

Don't know about performance difference between Transcend DDR3 & DDR2 but as transcend DDR3 1333Mhz has the same latency ie c9 it should perform simillar as other DDR3 mems rated at same speed & latency.

There is minimal performance difference between DDr3 1333Mhz C9 mems & DDr2 800Mhz C4 memes. But I think this performance difference is more when you caompare DDR3 1333Mhz C9 with DDr2 800Mhz C5 mems.

Check out this link to get an idea :
*ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/ddr2-800-vs-ddr3-1333.html

Don't know about the availability of 760G chipset mobos but you can get a 785G chipset series mobo called :

ASUS M4A78STD-V-EVO @ Rs. 6.7-7K
*www.overclock3d.net/reviews.php?/cpu_mainboard/asus_m4a785td-v_evo_785g_atx_preview/1

 

[surinder]

Wallah Bioster A785G @3.2K and Bioster A760G @2.8K.

 

[desiibond]

ASUS M4A78STD-V-EVO looks like a solid board and sub 7k price is terrific, given that it has CF.

 

[topgear]

Yup, That's board looks like some high end boards priced above 10K

BTW, buddy nice avatar

 

[MetalheadGautham]

Don't know about performance difference between Transcend DDR3 & DDR2 but as transcend DDR3 1333Mhz has the same latency ie c9 it should perform simillar as other DDR3 mems rated at same speed & latency.

There is minimal performance difference between DDr3 1333Mhz C9 mems & DDr2 800Mhz C4 memes. But I think this performance difference is more when you caompare DDR3 1333Mhz C9 with DDr2 800Mhz C5 mems.

Check out this link to get an idea :
*ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/ddr2-800-vs-ddr3-1333.html

Hmm... the problem (or rather, weird situation) is with AMD CPUs. They seem more dependent upon timings than frequency and there are reports of high end DDR2-800 sticks beating the crap outta low end DDR3-1333.

So I wanted to compare "standard" DDR2-800 with "standard" DDR3-1333.

Don't know about the availability of 760G chipset mobos but you can get a 785G chipset series mobo called :

ASUS M4A78STD-V-EVO @ Rs. 6.7-7K
*www.overclock3d.net/reviews.php?/cpu_mainboard/asus_m4a785td-v_evo_785g_atx_preview/1

whoa! awesome board. could have been a touch cheaper though.

ASUS M4A78STD-V-EVO looks like a solid board and sub 7k price is terrific, given that it has CF.

yeah. and the features too.

Wallah Bioster A785G @3.2K and Bioster A760G @2.8K.

where ? A684G @ 3.2K sounds next to impossible.

 

[comp@ddict]

Sorry guys, I wasn't online for many days. Here's the long needed update!
MEGA UPDATE

• Samsung 2033SW 20" LCD Monitor @ 7.2k
• Samsung 2043SN 20" LCD Monitor @ 7.5k
• Samsung 2233SW 22" FULL HD LD Monitor @ 9.2k
• Samsung P2250 21.5" FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 10.6k
• Samsung P2350 23" FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 11.6k

• BenQ G2020HD 20" LCD Monitor @ 6.8k
• BenQ 22" G2220 FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 8.6k
• BenQ 23.6" G2412 FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 11.3k
• BenQ 24"G2411 FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 11.7k

Acer V233H 23.6" FULL HD LCD Monitor @ 10.6k

Biostar TA785GE 128M @ 4.3k - - - 785G Motherboards!
Biostar A780GE @ 3.5k

Gigabyte 80 Plus Active PFC 460W @ 2.5k

OCZ 2GB DDR2 800MHz Titanium CL4 @ 1.7k
Transcend 2GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM @ 2.6k

Logitech MX518 Laser @ 1.6k
Razer Salmosa @ 1.6k

Athlon II X2 245 2.9GHz @ 3.5K
Athlon II X2 240 2.8GHz @ 3.2k
Phenom II X2 550 3.1GHz B.E. @ 5.2k

Palit GTX275 896MB GDDR3 @ 13.9K
Palit 9800GT 1GB GDDR3 @ 6.7k

 

[virilecliffhanger]

Sorry guys, I wasn't online for many days. Here's the long needed update!
MEGA UPDATE

Would be a not so great monitor but
what is the cost of View Sonic VA2226w NOW? .. Bought it a yr back .. i think for around 11.5k

 

[topgear]

^^ That's around 9.5K now !

 

[topgear]

Hmm... the problem (or rather, weird situation) is with AMD CPUs. They seem more dependent upon timings than frequency and there are reports of high end DDR2-800 sticks beating the crap outta low end DDR3-1333.

So I wanted to compare "standard" DDR2-800 with "standard" DDR3-1333.
whoa! awesome board. could have been a touch cheaper though.

AMD cpus performs better with DDR2 800 or 1066Mhz modules coz their mem controller is built inside the cpus unlike intel c2d & c2q series which memory
conteoller is built in NB chipset. So AMD cpus give morte mem bandwidth than intel c2d & c2q cpus.

But when you compare amd procs with intel core i7 you will see core i7 gives much better mem bandwidth than amd cpus coz core i7 mem controller is also built inside the cpu & it's a completely different performance beast.
-----------------------------------------
Posted again:
-----------------------------------------

Sorry guys, I wasn't online for many days. Here's the long needed update!
MEGA UPDATE

Nice to know that you are back online now

 

[virilecliffhanger]

^^ That's around 9.5K now !

Darn I would 've got a DVDRAM for the difference...

 

[damngoodman999]

Samsung 2233SW 22" FULL HD LD Monitor @ 9.2k

Its now 8.7K in Lynx

*www.lynx-india.com/index.php?productID=6108



But in Tamil nadu 8.5K

 

[als2]

^^ without tax and shipping

 

[damngoodman999]

@ als2

With Tax but no shipping

 

[Krow]

^Then thats a super deal! 8.7k! Wow! Samsng is cool!

 

[damngoodman999]

URGENT ??? NEED THE PRICE FOR SAMSUNG T190 & its available in INDIA now ???

Please can any one ??

 

[desiibond]

^^why are you so desperate for this underperforming monitor? there are better models.

 

[tkin]

URGENT ??? NEED THE PRICE FOR SAMSUNG T190 & its available in INDIA now ???

Please can any one ??

Its price is around 10k, but since HD monitors are available at that price usual shop dealers don't keep them, searched for one in Kolkata for a week, got T220 instead, get it, really good.

 

[damngoodman999]

^^why are you so desperate for this underperforming monitor? there are better models.

i searched everywhere no where its available dude . also check this link

*tvcalculator.com/

Which i mistaken in gaming with lcd , Gaming in HD monitors are no better for gamers it seems , HD monitor are 16 :9 which is good for movie only ( ie Blu ray ) But for games the HD monitor Loose 10 to 15 percents of pixels in high end games so NO EYE CANDY , 16 : 10 is only way for good for games That too with 2MS response time .

16:10

1440 X 900
1680 X 1050
1920 X 1200

16:9
1280 X 720 HD
1360 X 768 - said to HD but no !
1600 X 900
1920 X 108 0 HD



1360 X 768 & 1600 X 900 most games do not support these resolution with full Pixels .
Wat TKIN bought T220 was excellent for games .

The more Pixel density is needed for Good gaming , although comparing to 16:10 , 16:9 resolutions gets 10% more FPS than 16 :10 , but with good Grafix cards how to loose Eye candy . 4:3 was gamers resolution to get full eye candy but no more square monitors are available i should really think of getting the 16 : 10 .

*img142.imageshack.us/img142/7518/doooooooo.png

 

[tkin]

i searched everywhere no where its available dude . also check this link

*tvcalculator.com/

Which i mistaken in gaming with lcd , Gaming in HD monitors are no better for gamers it seems , HD monitor are 16 :9 which is good for movie only ( ie Blu ray ) But for games the HD monitor Loose 10 to 15 percents of pixels in high end games so NO EYE CANDY , 16 : 10 is only way for good for games That too with 2MS response time .

16:10

1440 X 900
1680 X 1050
1920 X 1200

16:9
1280 X 720 HD
1360 X 768 - said to HD but no !
1600 X 900
1920 X 108 0 HD



1360 X 768 & 1600 X 900 most games do not support these resolution with full Pixels .
Wat TKIN bought T220 was excellent for games .

The more Pixel density is needed for Good gaming , although comparing to 16:10 , 16:9 resolutions gets 10% more FPS than 16 :10 , but with good Grafix cards how to loose Eye candy . 4:3 was gamers resolution to get full eye candy but no more square monitors are available i should really think of getting the 16 : 10 .

*img142.imageshack.us/img142/7518/doooooooo.png

That's the specific reason I bought T220, some new games(console ports) and most old games don't support 1600x900, so i was looking for specifically 1680x1050+5ms least response+300cd/m2 Brightness+170 view angle(I played GoW on my friend's PC with 250cd/m2 brightness and bad viewing angle, YUCK).

So buy the T220, its only 2k more(12.1k), also shows minute back-light bleeding, amazing view angle(horizontally), and impressive brightness.

Did I mention that it didn't had a single dead/stuck pixel?

Buy it, You won't be disappointed.

 

[hellknight]

AOC F22 full HD 16:9 monitor is of Rs. 8800 now.. according to Digit.. and trust me this is a good monitor..