He's referring to tkin's comment about price difference of Rs.2k being a small amt. I agree actually. For example I'm extremely tight on budget, so every k matters a lot. Just trying to squeeze out the most out of the 30k(+-3k) that is available to me.
Neways I agree with MetalheadGautham.
GTS 250 sucks. nVidia can't fool ne1 by rebranding 8800GT(one of their best)!
I think that more than the bandwidth, the processor matters more w/ref GFX card.
Another idea which occured to me when I thought about how to use my money better (Intel platform) is to sacrifice a bit on my mobo and get an ASUS P5KPL-CM board (Is it good enough for a Quad?) and use the 3-4k I save on the GFX card.What would be the difference between a full ATX board and a micro ATX board? Suggestions?
AMD is tempting me too, especially cz of its awesome backward compatibility with the AM2+ socket. In that way Intel sucks. Another Query... For raw processing power, which would be better- Phenom II X4 920 or Q6600? Also, clock-for-clock, I saw the benchmarks favour the Q6600.
PS- Plz chk j1n M@tt's sig. It made me think seriously about the P5KPL-CM!
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1109321&postcount=601
You're wrong, GTS250 is rebranded and redesigned
9800GTX+(128 Shaders, 738MHz core clock, 1836MHz Shader clock and 1100MHz VRAM) not a
8800GT(112 Shaders,600MHz Core Clock, 1500MHz Shader and 900MHZ VRAM), it is miles away from 8800GT in terms of performance, if you want to game @ 1680x1050 and beyond this card(GTS250 1GB) is least you need.
Besides GTS250 has low power requirement and runs cooler, if you wait you can get it @ 9k in a few weeks.
Compare please:-
*www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_9800_gtx_plus_us.html
*www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_8800_gt_us.html
*www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_gts_250_us.html