Tech_Wiz said:
1. In case of no internet connection there is a big prob in case of Linux. [Any version]. In case of Windows you can just download One Exe or One Zip and its done.
What are you talking about? Software? Drivers? If its software then if you get a Vista-sized Linux DVD it will be fully loaded with everything.. everything you can imagine.
If its drivers for out of the box unsupported hardware then yes, you require Internet connection and you also need to read some documentation. But I don't agree with "in Windows you can just download One exe or One Zip". Even here its just one .tar.gz or .gz or .bz2 or whatever archive. Dependency problem is best handled by GNU/Linux when compared to all OS'.
Tech_Wiz said:
2. In case of Hardware driver installation prob BSOD is preffered thing than Linux Promt for average user.
Haf a look at these boot up errors:
Windows BSOD said:
Stop 0x0000000A or IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
and this:
Linux DMesg Error said:
ERROR: (device sd(8,17)): diRead: i_ino != di_number
jfs_lookup: iget returned bad inode, inum = 192755
nfsd: last server has exited
nfsd: unexporting all filesystems
jfs_mount: Mount Failure: File System Dirty.
Mount JFS Failure: -22
Which one would you prefer?
Tech_Wiz said:
But its still pain when it comes to resolving issues.
I agree to some extent to this statement. However I'd fully agree to this: But its still a pain when it comes to resolving issues concerning "unsupported hardware"
Tech_Wiz said:
But in case of CD based Installers which generally lack multimedia capability its hard for any user which has no net connection.
Like I said earlier, its unfair to compare a 700mb install to a 2.53gb install. Someone needs to try distros like Freespire, PCLinux OS CD versions. They come with everything. Even codecs like XVid or DivX which are NOT included with any version of Windows (for which the user WILL need an Internet connection), are bundled with these distros.
My point was that there are something which are not comparable across OS. MP3 support simply can't be bundled due to licensing issues. This has BEEN SAID A THOUSAND TIMES SUPPLEMENTED WITH REASONS. Nobody can say Windows sux coz it doesn't bundle DivX or Quicktime/Real Media support out of the box! I've had loads of issues playing RealMedia files on a newly installed bare Windows system.
gx_saurav said:
Unlike Admin password which won't let the user do anything if he doesn't know it
This is THE reason why Unix like systems are secure
gx_saurav said:
UAC informs that something fishy is going arround & if the user wants he can perform that action. So in a manner the concept of UAS is better. It tells the user what the situation & then he decides what to do.
This is the THE reason why Windows is INSECURE. How many times does the UAC pop up? Everytime you move your mouse??
How many users do you really think bother to READ what the UAC suggests? Esp. after seeing the UAC every second?
gx_saurav said:
I m talking about something like Safe mode in Windows. Is recovery mode a full GUI mode like Safe mode?
You can choose to boot into recovery mode CLI or choose to boot into GUI with minimal services (safe mode akin) loaded.
Because a lot of problems arise due to incompatible grafix drivers it makes NO sense to boot into Recovery mode GUI by default as it would be useless in such cases. You always haf the option to do so when PC boots into recovery mode.
Again circumstances are different in Windows and GNU/Linux. Some things are NOT comparable.
gx_saurav said:
Just cos u forgot, i would like to mention that Windows Vista already comes with 40k inbuilt drivers & 50k more on Windows Update. So yeah, he didn't need to install drivers for his motherboard etc on a default vista installation either.
Lets talk about motherboard chipset drivers, sound drivers, most of the gfx drivers (predominantly nVidia cards). How many did he install?
Do you think someone with an nVidia card sticks to the default driver provided by Windows? Do you anyone wid an nVidia or ATi card NOT installing Forceware or Catalyst drivers? Just find me ONE person who works on these default drivers.
In the same way X.org has the default VESA driver (and drivers for most nVidia cards and older gfx cards bundled). If you are not satisfied with it (which 95% people are), then you can install custom drivers.
Again the whole point of my post is that there are somethings which are NOT comparable across OS.
When someone posts a review it should NOT be a bit by bit comparison. Then its NOT called as a review.
The reason why people DO NOT appreciate Free (and/or Open source) Software is BECAUSE THEY GET ALL THE PAID SOFTWARE FOR FREE! The day stringint anti-piracy rules are implemented things WILL drastically change.