gxsaurav said:
first veer, it's easy to mask your IP address, i m doing this from years, so don't say such lame questions
Using Proxies, yes you can. But I'm not using any as I am not afraid of anything. If you trace back my IP, you'll get the legit ISP of my country. A masked IP address will only lead to well know proxy servers. I dont know about you gxsaurav but using a proxy here means either you are paranoid or upto something fishy.
gxsaurav said:
2nd, Me against ATI, man the card ANIDEX have I had that card long ago (2 months ago), I had a Gigabyte Radeon 9600 Pro, & belive me I Likes the Quality, but feature wise it was nothing compared to NVIDIA FX series, thats Y I switched to FX insted of radeon 9800 Pro
What feature does the 5000 FX series have that the Radeon 9800 series doesnt have ? Crappy shader performance ? Please, dont try to kid me with your biased decisions or purchases. I dont care if you go out and buy a XGI card and try to justify it as the most feature rich card ever.
icecoolz said:
I would go for an ATI but price constraints are a fact of life and well tho there is a diff in the ATI performace it doesnt warrant that kind of price ...I wouldnt pay 400 $ for a card which has a small diff in the benchmarks over the nvidia one...
What are your smoking ? ATI prices are same as Nvidia and in most cases cheaper than Nvidia.
Nvidia 6800 Ultra - ATI X800 XT PE - $499
Nvidia 6800 GT - ATI X800 Pro - $399
Nvidia 6800 - ATI X800 SE - $299
Nvidia 6600GT - ATI X700 XT - $199
Nvidia 6600 - ATI X700 - $149
demoninside said:
But talking about performance it's always NVIDIA where we trust nd pls veer optimazation is not cheating what u have said.
From the past 2-3 (since the 9700 era) ATI has always been better in performance, quality & features. The only extra thing 6800 series has is PS3.0 which is practically useless for now and will probably be useless till PS4.0 is out.
About optimization, I'm all for optimizing but there is a big difference between optimizing without losing quality and with losing quality. Nvidia did the latter to gain almost 45% gain in 3DMark03. When caught with their pants down, Nvidia didnt even confess up like ATI did. ATI's optimizations yeilded 3-4% increase because they didnt sacrifice quality. Anyway, what Nvidia did was outright wrong and all the consumers (owners of Nvidia cards) deserved an apology from Nvidia which is still due.