Don't let your imagination and vocabulary run wild. You are mixing up two words, Ignorant and slow-learning.
Before I continue with my reply, I just wanted to ensure that the conversation here is not a clash of both of our egos and purely conversational and again, I insist, not personal. I don't judge you. If you get offended, please tell me. I will restrain from responding. This is just a conversation with respect to a difference of opinion which I try to criticize as constructively as I can. Again, please mention if you find anything offending as you told before, I will make sure it doesn't happen again.
Ignorants are those who don't bother to learn. Slow-learners are willing to learn. Slow-learners cannot be called ignorants, and ignorants cannot be called slow-learners. There is a big difference in their attitudes.
1) Very true. I can get the difference you mentioned well.
2) Since you are equally inclined in English language usage, I must mention that "ignorants" is not a word. You should have formed the sentence with ignorance instead. leaving it aside,
We go out of our way for teaching slow-learners,that is our job, but even if we do this for ignorants, we will be leaving out hundreds of slow-learners who are willing to learn.
I am not sure of this.
Let me clear your doubt: I have a student who failed in Std.XI. He somehow passed Std.XI. in next attempt and joined my private tuitions(Biology) for Std.XII.
Ok, here I have a few things I have to really mention.
1) I dint know you were teaching tuitions for higher secondary. That is awesome!!
2) My question from the conversations here is that, to quote, "if that kid after failing in the 11th had come to you (before taking another attempt), from your point of view, would you have judged him and dismissed thinking he is ignorant and that is why he failed??" How do you decide there?
3) They are 16,17 years old. Of course they are misguided. Its the job of a teacher and parents (equally) to guide and veer/steer them in the right direction. Some kids are naturally shrewd. Others lose track. They are ignorant and incapable of understanding the virtues at that period.
3a) Would you dismiss a drug user and not produce him to a rehabilitation center because he has lost his mind? or he is arrogant, violent and filled with vindictive motives.. Of course he is.. he is lost!! He needs guidance! (more than any)
3b) To give another ex:, if the police were to think that the crime rate is definitely increasing and no matter how the law is and how strict they are, crime rate is the same or increasing and leave it... what will happen?? They are also
paid and they assumed or accepted the responsibilities, distress and other factors when they brought themselves into it.
Similar is your case. When you entitle yourself to be a teacher... your motives should be to guide the student. I hope you got what I wanted to explain from the analogy.
"God helps them those who help themselves".
Sorry, not a fan of adages or quotes or proverbs... They are time, space specific.
And as I said, don't mix slow-learners and ignorants. Their is a vast difference.
Would you or did you tell this to your Tuition center authorities or managers when you signed for the job??
Take it easy!!