Cheater Digit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Apollo

"Technologic"
Staff member
led_shankar said:
@Apollo: Hmm. You sound interested. Maybe a link to an uncensored wikipedia article would suffice.
My dear misunderstood friend, perhaps you need to explore and comprehend the subtleties of a conversation better.

If you've not read the forum rules, read them.
* No Posts Related To Anything Illegal.
Do not post/discuss/link to anything related to hacking / warez / cracks / pornography, etc. Piracy, and anything related to it is not allowed on this forum. Exchange / sale of pirated software / music / games / movies, etc., is forbidden.
So, is the idea of acquainting someone with porn, by posting forbidden content, your idea of making a point? You gotta be kidding me!
 

led_shankar

In Shamful Mystery
@Apollo: perhaps you need to explore and comprehend the subtleties of sarcasm better.

P.S. - I'm guessing Wikipedia will not be illegal, and there are many wikipedia articles which border on pornography. That's why I meentioned it.

I hope you're not angry or anything. I was not belittling you. Sorry, and peace.
 

Apollo

"Technologic"
Staff member
No problem. In any case, my initial comment was not directed at you. So, it's all good. [/handshake]

And for the record, no... I am not interested in any wikipedia link bordering on pornography. Thank you. :D
 

Vyasram

The pWnster
ah not the same old sh!t. for the thread starter,

go to google.com > Pref> Do not filter(safe search off) and search it if u wanna learn what porn is.

@Ultimate, I blive ur vacuum cleaner's name is Dig!t

And those photos aren't skimpy. they're cool afaic.

Btw , to the guy who said "they aren't supposed to be in a tech mag"
where wud ppl who dont hav net access get those pics

+1 Digit needs to b censored or they should provide a big A logo so tat children will stay off of such a crap
who said that they are crap. I dont see any harm in kids seeing those pics.
 

wizrulz

GUNNING DOWN TEAMS
WHAT THE HELL...NOT AGAIN..SAME TOPIC THREAD.....

WHO SAID THATS Pornographic...????

Common man what is least age of digit reader...10-11.....
If the same aged KID can watch REMIX songs and english songs on music channels and even indian movies in theater ....as nearly every hindi movie has a steamy scene in it nowadays....and also al heroines these days expose..whats the problenm in those photos........
U Want it watch it...if not look other way... ;) :p and turn the page....and for browsing cd its even more simpler...do not open pics with heroine and movies name ;)
 

NikhilVerma

Padawan
Vyasram said:
Btw , to the guy who said "they aren't supposed to be in a tech mag"
where wud ppl who dont hav net access get those pics.

I don't suppose digit has started some bandwagon to provide pictures of ladies in their DVD's. BTW I find it hard to understand that a person who buys digit magazine has NO ACCESS to the internet at all ?

and as I see it ... And if u think of it the way that if they just remove a few wallpapers like those I don't think ANYONE would stop buying digit will they ? Now if they don't remove any wallpapers then most probably "ruthless" the user won't buy it. I'm just taking ONE user into consideration here there may be so many more people like him in this country who don't appreciate such content from a tech magazine. So I suppose if digit wants to sell a few more copies then they should remove those wallies.
 

Sykora

I see right through you.
Digit has to identify their target audience. If they want to keep receiving mails from 14 year olds that they love the magazine and the content on the CD/DVD, then they should rethink their choice of wallpapers.
 

Raaabo

The Dark Lord
Staff member
Admin
?????????

Ultimate Z Fighter said:
DIGIT SUCKS™


Unless you can come up with a reason for that comment. YOU suck, and I don't want to get into the whole "What" angle of that here.

As for people cribbing about a few wallpapers? Where do you live? Under a rock? Have you been under house arrest for the past 10 years?

I personally sat down and removed at least 1000 wallpapers of stuff that could be considered offensive. I can't believe you still found a few offensive.

They're wallpapers, and people want to put beautiful women / men on their desktops. All you do is crib about how we shouldn't have put those images, while others complain about how we're too strict about the content, and should stop being paranoid.

Let's look at this in a different way:


If you see a woman on the street wearing what you consider to be "skimpy clothes" will you...

a) Walk up to her, tell her that what she is doing is wrong?

b) Add her to your list of people to kill when you finally lose it?

c) Oogle like hell, ask her out on a date, get your face slapped, go back to your street corner looking for the next one?

d) Sue the clothes manufacturers?

e) Bombard her parents with obscene phone calls and letters, threatening them, telling them to buy her salwar kameezes, OR ELSE!

f) Look the other way and get on with life?


If you think a clean magazine like Digit is giving you the worst of the technology world, think again. The Internet, e-mail, MMS, TV, Other mainstream magazines and newspapers are all bringing you racy content, and pushing the envelope, Digit isn't.

99 per cent of you guys will have content on your mobile phones (SMSes or MMSes), e-mail inboxes, on your hard drive, and elsewhere, that you KNOW are a lot worse than the wallpapers we gave. Stop being hypocrites.

Yes, we did have a few (5 out of 2000) wallpapers of women or men in bathing suits — they were actually game characters, if I remember correctly — and they were there because they were all part of a set of similar wallpapers. And ALL of them would have got a "G" rating from any ratings board — I've seen more skin in music videos, bollywood movies, theatres, TV serials and even cricket comentators!

I suggest you stop wasting your time nit-picking about silly stuff.

Someone mentioned that they didn't like the articles? Now that's more like it! Tell us what you didn't like about a specific article, and what you think we should do to improve, or what you would like to see more of. We'd love to hear from you guys!

Of course, please share your feedback in the correct forum section!

thanks,


Raaabo
 

thecyclone2k

In the zone
For some people - a naked kid's dancing in rain - photo main be child pr0n. lol. pr0n or porn is different thing.

And, it is not the wallpapers for which the magazines sales depend. It is just a free stuff, which barely has any relation to sales.

Even if you stop digit, the thing doesn't stop here. You have to stop - TV, MEDIA, NEWSPAPERS, etc....
 
S

SE><IE

Guest
Superb Raaabo!!! :D You gotta grow up kids. and if you want the wallpapers to be censored then perhaps you want every skin colored spot to be patched up!! gimme the wallpaps and I'll patch em up for you... Personally
 

gary4gar

GaurishSharma.com
FatBeing said:
@ruthless:
You need to
1. Learn what pornography really is
2. and then see if those wallpapers match that definition

We always check the wallpapers before we put them on the CD/DVD.

love to see a definition of porn:p
 

paul_007

Padawan
great said raabo,

pls guys those who r shouting about wallpapers ,magazines covers pls grow up , i know what do u when no one is at home or at night :)) :)) :))
 

Raaabo

The Dark Lord
Staff member
Admin
pornography
n : creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire

(Dictionary.com)

I don't think we can yell too much about someone calling something pornography, because what is porn to me might be art to you. It's very subjective. Whether it's offensive or not is what matters.

PS: On a lighter note, going by the dictionary definition, if you think something is porn, you are being aroused by it! So, continuing along those lines, it didn't take much to arouse the few people who complained, did it?

Raaabo
 

paul_007

Padawan
Raaabo said:
pornography

PS: On a lighter note, going by the dictionary definition, if you think something is porn, you are being aroused by it! So, continuing along those lines, it didn't take much to arouse the few people who complained, did it?

Raaabo

:)) :))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom