izzikio_rage
Technomancer
This is an awesome in depth discussion. Bahut time baad. Nac, best of luck on the new flash (and cam too)
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
It's not like I wanted to try every gear available. I was asked to take it, and I couldn't refuse. After all I was there to do what he asks.it looks like you were switching equipment too many times to have learnt much about each.
The reason he shoots RAW is that he could get some amazing results, at least that's what I presume. But it lacks something he wants, glossy look.RAW requires a decent amount of post processing to look good. It contains a lot of data from the camera but how that data is used is determined by the software you open it in. Try opening RAW in lighttoom or Capture one and applying some tweaks. It'll start looking amazing
RAW vs jpeg debate will go on and on. It's a never-ending thing. I have read many professional shoot jpeg only. The best examples are news reporter, sports shooter.I dont shoot raw at all nowdays...people say raw contains more details..that same detail makes raw file matt finish..u have to use application which will smoothen them to make it look like jpeg
28GB? So he shot in jpeg? That's a way to go if they are gonna shoot this many photos. In north, wedding ceremonies and events go on for 3 days, right?wow Raw+Jpeg on those big guys thats really a lot...the best pics are processed...out of my weddings 2800 pics given by photographer which was 28gb ...we could print only 180 pics in the album ...remaining we can forget in our hdd forever
A friend of mine shoots RAW and finds that the pictures are little dull and kinda looks matte finish even after processing. He asked me why he's not getting that glossy look of jpeg which he gets from the camera.
My guess is something to do with his workflow, but I am not sure as I don't shoot RAW. What do you guys think? Is it the RAW characteristics to not get glossy or is it his processing?
that's huge size. Looks like lot of footage for the videos. What was it, 4k video?Got a wedding HDD of almost 250GB. Jpegs (full size) and videos. Had 3 guys shooting. Idea is that send them the ones you like best, then they'll process and make an album.
I have seen few, some of 'em are good. The most recent one is this, it's a pre-wedding song. I really like this, may be it's the song I like most.I dont like those songs behind videos
Sure, RAW is dull and noisy.The raw image is duller than the SOOC JPG for the very same image or is that just a general impression?
...
Various combinations of the above.
Raw files can be pushed quite hard. Comparison of dull unprocessed raw and punchy processed JPG:
It's the first time since buying this lens, I mean other than test shots.I am going to my hometown for 3 days..I will test my Nikon 300mm ..yey I will also shoot RAW and see if I get sharper pics..
Actually I use only a 8GB card, its just too less for RAW and fills in less then 200 pics ..lets see.