comp@ddict
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
True......But aargh..for once I though Deneb was actually gonna make cake out of Intel..............
^^ I support you in this matter.
My first PC was AMD k6-II (back in '98 AFAIR) which was far better than P-II machine that time. Later I had Athlon XP (better than intel P4) and Athlon X2 (better than intel dual-core).
It's core2duo where Intel beats AMD.
I have bought C2DE8400 this time (first in my life with an Intel proccy) because Intel now has edge in price-performance ratio.
I'll stick to this config for 1 or 1.5 years. By that time I think AMD will again come on top. And remember, it's AMD whose products made, nvidia and Intel to lower their prices.
Competetion makes consumer a winner.
Check this link, its little bit detailed review and why intel is better, beats phenoms in power cunsumtion and performance. *techreport.com/articles.x/14424
I need to keep my system on for very long times(almost half of the day), AMD though cheap would not suit for me.
yeah applications will soon come on to quads also(was putting my comments in short and comp cut it hence post did not merged), so if I buy my choice will be C2Q 9xxx series, mostly 9300/9400/9450, seriously waiting for price drop.
wat abt amd??? is X4 9550 better than E8400????
If you are on normal computing...then go for X4 9550...but for gaming E8400 is always better and will run lot cooler...
someone also told me that amd processor with amd mobo will work great with ati gpu's...but i dont think thats true....
what does that mean ?i too saw in some website i forgot that which one it is -------- may be its true that ati hybrid crossfire works with amd to ati???
seeing ur other posts u don't look satisfied at all ......i m pretty much satisfied with my E7200 @ stock speed ..cos it can do everything and anything i can do ...anyway its true or not im satisfied with my phenom and the hd4850 i can play all games in 1280*1024 with all high ------------- i cant say intel is bad and amd is good ------------ by the way both the proc are doing good now a days but we should take the proc as we use
AMD X2 and X3 and even X4 in some cases are no match for E8400/8500like
AMD athlonX2 ----------------->good proc for games and tasking
intel core2duo ----------------->better processing whole lot intel technology ,intel
started on building better gaming proc E8400/8500
which made superb 45nm penryn blows out the games
who said that ?AMD phenom X3 ---------------> i dont think the 3 cores support the widows
hardly true for gaming ..they are not good for gaming ..and how many multitasking applications are u aware that are present in market today ???AMD phenomX4 ------------------>9550/9650/9750/9850 are not best but it is good
for the hard multitasking and good gaming with
L3 cache
wrong intel core2Quad is much better architecture than phenom X4 ...intel2quad ---------------------->6600 is also equal to AMD 9650/9750 Intel most
success quads ever sold out , the late release of phenoms would also be the reason for the sale -----
^^actually, both of you missed one main point: In a Core2Duo VS Phenom war, the wins are never absolute. When you compare C2D E8400 to a similarly priced Phenom X4 9550, the former is better at gaming and often at unitasking because its optimised for that. But if you try to do lots of tasks at the same time, 9550 has the upper hand. E7200 may be again great at playing crysis, but if you try to run a 64bit virtual PC, write a DVD and game at the same time, Phenom X3 8650 wins (I am not comparing 8450 since its 1K cheaper).
Excellent post, but I've read in some reviews that some multithreaded applications fail to recognise the third core in X3s and they perform like X2s.what does that mean ?
seeing ur other posts u don't look satisfied at all ......i m pretty much satisfied with my E7200 @ stock speed ..cos it can do everything and anything i can do ...
AMD X2 and X3 and even X4 in some cases are no match for E8400/8500
who said that ?
hardly true for gaming ..they are not good for gaming ..and how many multitasking applications are u aware that are present in market today ???
wrong intel core2Quad is much better architecture than phenom X4 ...
all in all i don't mean to sound like intel guy ...but AMD churned out some really great processors in the past ..but right now intel is better off with c2d and c2q architecture.
i would love see AMD pull out some miracle like HD series to fight with intel ....that will benefit users ..
what does that mean ?
seeing ur other posts u don't look satisfied at all ......i m pretty much satisfied with my E7200 @ stock speed ..cos it can do everything and anything i can do ...
AMD X2 and X3 and even X4 in some cases are no match for E8400/8500
who said that ?
hardly true for gaming ..they are not good for gaming ..and how many multitasking applications are u aware that are present in market today ???
wrong intel core2Quad is much better architecture than phenom X4 ...
all in all i don't mean to sound like intel guy ...but AMD churned out some really great processors in the past ..but right now intel is better off with c2d and c2q architecture.
i would love see AMD pull out some miracle like HD series to fight with intel ....that will benefit users ..
Excellent post, but I've read in some reviews that some multithreaded applications fail to recognise the third core in X3s and they perform like X2s.
This cabinet is really great, there is one 120mm led intake fan in front which cools the HDDs upto a good extent, two 80mm side intake fans cool the VGA and CPU, option for adding 120mm rear exhaust fan.hey i agree with u that AMDX4 9550 is not equal to c2q6600 -------- but only 10%-12% less performance than c2q6600
i know that intel is now ruling the proc world i think AMD will be sometimes -------- that ok
whats with that 3 cores i just saw in this threads only some one said that windows appl is not accessing 3 cores is it right or not ???????????????????
can u tell me hows ur bijili cabinet -------- i was deciding to get that now iam using i ball gamer casing its getting to hot -------- price of your of ur cabinet????
Good Luckthanks i can get this cabby tom --------- >
y U all saying that e8400 ---- did u guys ever saw the power of phenom on gaming ... check out the L3 CACHE intel does not have such technology ... l3 cache cannot be used for higher end application for gaming its massive to smooth playing E8400 is penryn tech ok ... look @ the fsb phenom 9550 has 1800 ... E8400 is 1333 .... now say ----- before saying check out the performance
Forgot about the multiplier thing: 1333*9
Additionally all penryn processors runs cool: 45 NM architecture: Good for massive Overclocking
Higher clock: Good Gaming (Current games does not utilize Quad cores efficiently, see the Crysis Video in You Tube with Queen of Quad Background Music)
What RAM is for system, cache is for processor. FSB speed is more important than L3 cache, its so small that no huge data can be stored there