@ Anonrion
You have presented an extremely simplistic, almost a naïve understanding of communism. Anyway, you are entitled to your opinion.
When I claimed it to be a fragmented and confused ideology, I was referring to two aspects of communism. Its fragmented because there are many branches and derivatives of communism, from marxism, leninism, titoism to maoism. There is no single canonical version of communism, and each party has bent the ideology for its own use.
Every single theory, which is subjective to individual interpretations, will have multiple facets. It is inevitable. The theory of communism is not fragmented. Different people have tried to look at it from different perspective, gave it a different spin. I will not bore you with the details of the differences between Marxism and Leninism and Maoism etc. The basic differences are extremely subtle and technical and are mainly about the implementation of MARXISM. Marxism, however, remains at the core of all the so called “fragmentations” . Fragmentations were not the reason why communism waned. Internal inconsistencies and flawed logic resulted in its demise.
In India itself, there are four major communist parties who are fighting amongst themselves on the basis of ideology alone.
The Indian scene is extremely different and it has got nothing to do with communism itself. A faction of the unified CPI wanted to support Congress while another faction did not. This resulted in the split. The CPI(M-L) entered the scene much later and was a freak movement started at Naxalbari.
About the propoganda, there is a famous paper that students of the mass media have access to called manufacturing consent. This is basically tells why the mass media indulges in propoganda and how. There are four media "filters" that disallow certain kind of information from appearing the the media, as this would not allow for distribution, circulation or profits. These filters are ownership, that is nothing negative about the owners, the second filter is advertising, nothing negative about the advertisers, the third filter is sourcing, that is where the information is sourced from (which in turn have the first two filters too), and the fourth filter is flak, that is criticism against the publication, and the final filter is anti-communism. So anti-communist propoganda is a basic necessity of mass media. This is because the whole enviornment where mass media thrives in, as in advertising, different products, things like brand loyalty and consumption (of goods and services, not just food) cannot happen in a communist enviornment.
I am well aware of Manufacturing Consent, by Noam Chomskey. But I don’t understand how it is in anyway relevant in this discussion. He was arguing that free press is not necessarily free. And also remember propaganda worked on the other side of the divide as well. If you want to argue that media is the reason for misconstruing communism, it will cut both ways. Let me assure you. People who want to know, they don’t depend solely on one side of a story.
…communism is basically a classless society of human beings sharing everything on earth without a god above.
There are many ways that a society can be classified. Wealth is just one of those. Communism probably eliminates class in that sense, but it creates another, more bizarre, more dangerous class – the political class. In other words, it simple switches the mode of classification - the classification, nevertheless, remains.
…the industrial produce back then was great. Imagine a society without brands. Say a product like a shirt would be of the same quality for everyone. It would be of the same price. All bags would be of the same quality. This conserves more resources, so that competetors don't have to hoard and waste materials. There would be just a single latest chip or graphic card in the market, without the business of two or more competitors just muddying up the field and giving products of a lower standard than they would have if they had worked together.
This is nothing but romanticizing about communism. Industrial produce of Russia was never “great”. You are again forgetting competition breeds quality. Without completion, there would be no urgency or need to make better products (Russia, Cuba, Vietnam). And no, altruism doesn’t work, neither does “political consciousness” (Mao).
Remember those immortal words of Orwell in The Animal Farm, “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
Now the point of democracy. It is great in theory, but not in practice. You cannot keep everyone happy, and say twenty one percent of the people do not vote for the BJP in the next elections, twenty one percent of a billion is still a large number of people, and it does not make sense to ignore their demands.
No one says, democracy is perfect. It is however the lesser of all the evils available. Communism leads to dictatorship and that is the last thing anybody wants. You are forgetting, that in order to hold on to power, the inevitable tyranny follows. Communism on paper is the rule of mass, but in reality it is a rule of few, and in most cases, one. (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Fiedel )
Right now the economic system stratifies the people. A car is not just a car, its a status symbol. While four wheels and an engine are there to take people around, there is a class associated with every car, whether it is a maruti, a santro, or a gallardo. The same applies for a phone. If it were all the same, then a lot of wastage would be saved on - all the materials wasted on advertising, all the materials wasted on competing products, all the manpower used pitting designers against each other instead of focussing their energies together. This may not work out for everyone, and it has its flaws, but that's what the idea is, that's what the ideology is.
Yes, a society with no artificial means of classifying humans is always welcome. But its better to live in reality than to get lost in a pipe dream.
I am not saying communism IS the answer for sure, or that it does not have problems. I am just saying that it is heavily misunderstood and people are not open minded about it.
Well, if it is misunderstood then, a whole generation of Russkies, Chinese, East Europeans and Vietnamese were dumb as hell.