Bin Laden Died of Typhoid!

Status
Not open for further replies.

ssdivisiongermany1933

Still in war with allies
Bin laden was only guy who was cheking American Fascism , his death will lead to the growth of evil American Fascism , which took innocent lives all over the world .

May bin laden have heaven if died but if alive should check american Fascism
 

king007

In the zone
mediator said:
See nobody here said that Mulsims are terrorists! U only misunderstood and I know why! There are ignorant elements who dont know the real issue and then keep doing what Pakistanis really want => communal tensions! Please forgive them. U dont have to be like them. If u retaliate them it will only make matters worse! In most threads here u'll find many rowdy/ignorant elemts quoting "Muslims as terrorists". But then u'll also find greater number of people scolding them and telling them thats wrong!
Thanks that's what I like people who actually understand and say that Terrorism cannot be labeled to any religion. Thanks again for understanding and making others understand!

Bin Laden is a Terrorist and so is George Bush, there is no difference between the two, other than presentation by Media for former as Terrorist and later as Socialist...

No religion teaches bad things or killing any human being for any damn reason, but nobody should judge or comment about a entire religion just because of activities done by few individuals....

Respect for all religions is what our great Indian nation teaches us, United we stand and divided we fall...
 
Last edited:

Yamaraj

The Lord of Death
imranais said:
No religion teaches bad things or killing any human being for any damn reason, but nobody should judge or comment about a entire religion just because of activities done by few individuals....

Respect for all religions is what our great Indian nation teaches us, United we stand and divided we fall...
Then you should be ashamed of the muslim terrorists who are committing inhuman
crimes all over the World, in the name of Islam and Jihad. Are you?

Muslims, in India, need to do more than just preaching that Islam is not about
violence, terrorism and separatism. Are you ready to accept the Indian laws
and constitution as others do? Are you ready to give up Shariya and firm your
beliefs in a democratic nation? If this can happen in France, why not here?

But no. Islam has always been and will continue to be a separatist's dream and
ideal set of beliefs. You will all cry "unity", but cheer for Arabs and Pakistanis.
Muslims will always remain as tiny social islands in this vast national ocean.
There is reason why muslims are one of the the most under-developed communities
in India and abroad. And the reason is - lack of nationality and love for Islamic
states and their own laws. Until and unless you get rid of this mentality, others
will always look down on muslims and Islam.

BTW, I don't think Osama was responsible for 9/11 attacks. He didn't have the
guts or resources to carry out such an extensive and well-planned action on his own.
 

king007

In the zone
Yamaraj said:
Then you should be ashamed of the muslim terrorists who are committing inhuman
crimes all over the World, in the name of Islam and Jihad. Are you?
Yes Every muslim is ashamed of the terrorists acts done by Al-Qaaeda or by US or other countries. People who kill have no religion, they just know to kill...
Yamaraj said:
Muslims, in India, need to do more than just preaching that Islam is not about violence, terrorism and separatism. Are you ready to accept the Indian laws and constitution as others do?
Get ur facts right, no citizen of India is above the Indian Law and Indian Constitution.
Yamaraj said:
Are you ready to give up Shariya and firm your beliefs in a democratic nation? If this can happen in France, why not here?
No I am not ready to give up Shariya, and if u have knowledge Shariya Laws are part of the Indian Laws. Indian Constitution has provisions for Shariya Laws.
Yamaraj said:
But no. Islam has always been and will continue to be a separatist's dream and ideal set of beliefs. You will all cry "unity", but cheer for Arabs and Pakistanis.
Get more education thats only thing I can say. I dont need to prove how much I love my country and give a proof of my patriotism to people like you who have a closed mindset.
Yamaraj said:
Muslims will always remain as tiny social islands in this vast national ocean. There is reason why muslims are one of the the most under-developed communities in India and abroad. And the reason is - lack of nationality and love for Islamic states and their own laws. Until and unless you get rid of this mentality, others will always look down on muslims and Islam.
People like you who have no knowledge about anything look down on muslims and Islam and as I said I love my country as much as I love Islamic Laws and again I say I dont need to prove it to you. Plz let me know which Islamic Law u know about is wrong and why u think is wrong.
Yamaraj said:
BTW, I don't think Osama was responsible for 9/11 attacks. He didn't have the guts or resources to carry out such an extensive and well-planned action on his own.
Great then plz go and tell Uncle Sam and others who have destroyed countries in search of one man, who according to u does not have the guts and resources to do such a unbelievable act.
 

Yamaraj

The Lord of Death
imranais said:
Yes Every muslim is ashamed of the terrorists acts done by Al-Qaaeda or by US or other countries. People who kill have no religion, they just know to kill...
Correct. But there are *moderate* people who help the terrorists in many other
ways. They provide moral and economical support. Can you describe why some
muslim lads participated in suicide bombings in Britain? They were British nationals,
but their love and affection was with Arabs and Palestines. They killed their
own because of others, why?

Even if we consider all humans equal, why kill someone only in protest of killings?
Stand up and fight against those in your community who provide support to
the terrorists in any way. AFAIK, terrorists don't discreminate. They kill anyone
and everyone in their benefit.

imranais said:
Get ur facts right, no citizen of India is above the Indian Law and Indian Constitution.

No I am not ready to give up Shariya, and if u have knowledge Shariya Laws are part of the Indian Laws. Indian Constitution has provisions for Shariya Laws.
Wrong! Indian constituion was revised many times by the politicians to satiate
their vote banks. Why only muslims should have the priviledge? Let's make more
revisions to make Hindus, Christians, Buddhists happy too.

I'm in favor of "One law for all". This is neither a Hindu state, nor an Islamic one.
No religion should have specific laws in constitution that make life of any Indian
national any more difficult. Many muslim feminists have voiced against the Mullahs
and Imams, and the way Islam looks down on women. There are many other issues
as well, inappropriate for discussion in this forum.

imranais said:
Get more education thats only thing I can say. I dont need to prove how much I love my country and give a proof of my patriotism to people like you who have a closed mindset.

People like you who have no knowledge about anything look down on muslims and Islam and as I said I love my country as much as I love Islamic Laws and again I say I dont need to prove it to you. Plz let me know which Islamic Law u know about is wrong and why u think is wrong.
I already have enough education to boot, and to make people analyse their own.
I'm not asking for a proof of patriotism. Just don't start preaching that Islam
is not a religion of violence, when there are so many people being killed in the
name of your religion. Do you ever think about the hundreds of children killed
in Beslan school attack in Russia, thousands who were killed in Kashmir?

As for the Islamic laws, I'm against any religion having specific laws that may
or may not interfere with the laws and constituion of a nation. Islamic laws are
for an Islamic state only. Having any religious laws in the constitution, and allowing
the religious leader to govern in parallel, is very bad for any country.

That being said, I've nothing personal against any religion. But I'm of the opinion
that religions should be a personal affair, and not be in the way of the Government
in any way. In France, they banned the Sikhs and Muslims from wearing their
turbon or burkah, and everyone agreed after a few verbal clashes. That is quite
an example to follow.

In the age of Robo Sapiens, religions are, in my opinion, a little too outdated.
 
Last edited:

mediator

Technomancer
Well @imranais....bro dont get me wrong! But I too feel there shud be no laws for one specific religion! Thats partiality then. There shudnt be any laws for any religion! I'm not a religious person though I'm a Hindu.That means I'm not religously devoted. I dont practise any prayers(except just before exams) and fasts. But for the sake of masses who are emotionally attached to religion I support a few things like celebrating holidays like Diwali,Holi,Id etc which bring happiness and one day off :D!

As for rules and laws in a religion, I think its a torture to have such a religion which has rules. In mah opinion life shud be lived freely,ethically,non-violently in a civilised society. If u let some religious rules govern ur life then I dont think ur living life freely and happily. Many people say religion is a set of rules and laws! But tell me any rules in Hinduism that is there to follow. I dont know any rules nor I follow any religious rule if there's any.

Prayer,Namaz etc are nothing but a form of meditation and associated with spirituality. But if u say u shud do prayers all the time then what are u doing in life? Are u moving forward? Are u helping others? Are u earning maximum money to keep ur family happy?

I dunno about Sharia, but I know about the concept of "Talak Talak Talak"! Why is there a separate rule for divorce in Muslim community? I appreciate that u understood mah previous post and boast about ur patriotism and are proud to be an Indian. But then why is that Muslims dont follow national rule on divorce, but follow a rule that is modified and made by a few Islamic clerics? Who gave such rights to these clerics to modify Islam and govern ur life? Isnt Islam urs? Will they tell u what do now? Dont ISlamic women have the life to live freely like other women? If u think its for protecting the girls in the family so that no one eyes them then every other girl of all other religions are protected and educated in some manner. But they are not denied of their life. Remember its the woman who holds the key to family happiness! If u give the household power to her then ur happy for the rest of ur life!

And one more thing I dont like in any religion is violent activities like slaughtering of animals like goats and that too in numbers just for the sake of religion! I consider killing an animal just like that equivalent to murdering people and doing terrorism! Religious holdays shu be celebrated without causing any pain to people or animals!
Similarly I criticise people who celebrate too much diwali! 2-5 crackers is OK. But then polluting the atmosphere so that people dont even get to breath is not OK.


Neways just like u read my earlier post line by line and understood it. I want u to read the same this and meditate again on what I said!
I supported u previously because u had a point. U liked my post because I supported u and u thought I was sensible enough. But dont get me wrong this time. I support ur views now also but not the "laws" thing.
Debates like this are meant to tell ur thoughts about the topic. Other debaters shud understand what the person is trying to say before speaking his own thoughts!
Suppose if some hindus or christians criticise islam, then its understood that u'll get angry. But rather u shud think why are they criticing? Similarly if some Muslims crtitices other hindus. The matter shud be thought of in the same way!

Try to think about what I said. I appreciate u didnt made personal comments and burst off because of misunderstanding but rather tried to defend ur community! Similarly by removing such partiality like laws, muslims like u can prosper ur religion!

I expect muslims like u to give a fitting answer to people like Osama and countries like Pakistan and tell them that their attempts wont succeed and wont bring any communal violence!
 
Last edited:

Stick

Ambassador of Buzz
Friends,

Do you know Who Support Iran, Iraq, Laden and now Pakistan, it's US presidents and there policy. First of all thy USE them (Support Terrorist) and when all is done they THROGUH them, and no one like KICK on ASS.

Thats why After Afghanistan, US turn to Iraq than (may be soon) Iran and aftr Iran, PAKISTAN.
 

king007

In the zone
mediator said:
Well @imranais....bro dont get me wrong! But I too feel there shud be no laws for one specific religion! Thats partiality then. There shudnt be any laws for any religion! I'm not a religious person though I'm a Hindu.That means I'm not religously devoted. I dont practise any prayers(except just before exams) and fasts. But for the sake of masses who are emotionally attached to religion I support a few things like celebrating holidays like Diwali,Holi,Id etc which bring happiness and one day off :D!
No bro you talk sense so I am not getting u wrong! All laws are applicable for all citizens of India. No criminal of India is treated as per his/her religion. No one is above the Law in India. Having said that there are a few exceptions for everyone. This is because there are some laws such as Inheritance rights, marriage, divorce etc are different in Muslim laws based on teachings of Qur'an and teachings of the prophet. With regards to partiality, one cannot tell a Sikh to wear a Helmet bec its compulsory by law, there are exeptions. There is no theory which can legitimately argue that people are going to be more integrated simply because they are governed by a uniform civil code. For example, even though Hindus and Sikhs have the same personal laws, the anti-Sikhs riots took place in 1984. What happened to national integration in this case? Similarly, no one can say with certainty that Hindus and Muslims will stop reaching for each other’s necks if there is a Uniform Civil Code UCC in place. So why argue about this point as these would also put extra burden on already full of burden courts. Cases such as Inheritance, divorce etc which are given on judgement in days by Shariat courts, if goto courts will take years...
mediator said:
As for rules and laws in a religion, I think its a torture to have such a religion which has rules. In mah opinion life shud be lived freely,ethically,non-violently in a civilised society. If u let some religious rules govern ur life then I dont think ur living life freely and happily. Many people say religion is a set of rules and laws! But tell me any rules in Hinduism that is there to follow. I dont know any rules nor I follow any religious rule if there's any.
Rules of religion are bound to be followed. I am not preaching religion here but in Islam, Drinking is prohibited, there is a reason for it isn't it? No true muslim will ever go and drink, if he does he is no more a muslim. In Islam, No man can have illegal sex before marriage or sex with other women after marriage. The Islamic Law states that if a man is found guilty of such a crime he should be stoned to death. Imagine if this law is implemented in any country, will any person commit heinous crime of Rape, he would fear his life and the torture of getting stoned to death in public. There are many laws which are logical and for betterment of life, if I start listing it would probably take pages.
mediator said:
Prayer,Namaz etc are nothing but a form of meditation and associated with spirituality. But if u say u shud do prayers all the time then what are u doing in life? Are u moving forward? Are u helping others? Are u earning maximum money to keep ur family happy?
Yes Bro I agree with u that prayer's are form of meditation. In fact Namaz means submitting ur will to the almighty God. God never asked to pray all the time. But one should thank and praise God for everything he has given to us. A Person has other duties also to perform towards his parents, family, friends etc. Treat everyone with respect and spread peace and also working and earning money is important, but the right means of earning is also governed by religious laws. Money should be earned by looting someone or cheating someone but in a manner which is accpetable to all. And Islam specifically states a lot in the Qur'an about Education. Muslims who do not educate their children (boy/girl) are nothing but ignorant towards Islam.
mediator said:
I dunno about Sharia, but I know about the concept of "Talak Talak Talak"! Why is there a separate rule for divorce in Muslim community? I appreciate that u understood mah previous post and boast about ur patriotism and are proud to be an Indian. But then why is that Muslims dont follow national rule on divorce, but follow a rule that is modified and made by a few Islamic clerics? Who gave such rights to these clerics to modify Islam and govern ur life? Isnt Islam urs? Will they tell u what do now?
Triple Talaq has been argued many times. Believe me there are lot of conditions involved with giving Triple Talaq. A person cannot say 3 times Talaq and he is divorced (as commonly understood by all), but there are lots and lots of conditions to it. I am not boasting about my Patriotism, I dont need to but you rightly said I am a proud Indian and like I said earlier there are exceptions. I dont listen or let anyone rule by life like you said, if it matches with the Qur'an and teachings of Prophet it is to be followed or it is simply to be Rejected no matter which cleric has said or modified it.
mediator said:
Dont ISlamic women have the life to live freely like other women? If u think its for protecting the girls in the family so that no one eyes them then every other girl of all other religions are protected and educated in some manner. But they are not denied of their life. Remember its the woman who holds the key to family happiness! If u give the household power to her then ur happy for the rest of ur life!
Islam gives equal rights to women as compared to men. Western talk of women’s liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of exploitation of her body, degradation of her soul, and deprivation of her honour. Western society claims to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers, hidden behind the colourful screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture’.
mediator said:
And one more thing I dont like in any religion is violent activities like slaughtering of animals like goats and that too in numbers just for the sake of religion! I consider killing an animal just like that equivalent to murdering people and doing terrorism! Religious holdays shu be celebrated without causing any pain to people or animals!
Similarly I criticise people who celebrate too much diwali! 2-5 crackers is OK. But then polluting the atmosphere so that people dont even get to breath is not OK.
It seems u are a vegetarian...
Humans have Omnivorous set of teeth
If you observe the teeth of herbivorous animals like the cow, goat and sheep, you will find something strikingly similar in all of them. All these animals have a set of flat teeth i.e. suited for herbivorous diet. If you observe the set of teeth of the carnivorous animals like the lion, tiger, or leopard, they all have a set of pointed teeth i.e. suited for a carnivorous diet. If you analyze the set of teeth of humans, you find that they have flat teeth as well as pointed teeth. Thus they have teeth suited for both herbivorous as well as carnivorous food i.e. they are omnivorous. One may ask, if Almighty God wanted humans to have only vegetables, why did He provide us also with pointed teeth? It is logical that He expected us to need and to have both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food.
Human beings can digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food
The digestive system of herbivorous animals can digest only vegetables. The digestive system of carnivorous animals can digest only meat. But the digestive system of humans can digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. If Almighty God wanted us to have only vegetables then why did He give us a digestive system that can digest both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food?
Even plants have life
Certain religions have adopted pure vegetarianism as a dietary law because they are totally against the killing of living creatures. If a person can survive without killing any living creature, I would be the first person to adopt such a way of life. In the past people thought plants were lifeless. Today it is a universal fact that even plants have life. Today science tells us that even plants can feel pain. But the cry of the plant cannot be heard by the human being. This is due to the inability of the human ear to hear sounds that are not in the audible range i.e. 20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz. Anything below and above this range cannot be heard by a human being. Thus their logic of not killing living creatures is not fulfilled even by being a pure vegetarian.
If every human being was a vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation of cattle in the world, since their reproduction and multiplication is very swift. Allah (swt) in His Divine Wisdom knows how to maintain the balance of His creation appropriately. No wonder He has permitted us to have the meat of the cattle. It is mentioned in Manu Smruti, the law book of Hindus, in chapter 5 verse 30
"The eater who eats the flesh of those to be eaten does nothing bad, even if he does it day after day, for God himself created some to be eaten and some to be eater."

mediator said:
Neways just like u read my earlier post line by line and understood it. I want u to read the same this and meditate again on what I said!
I read ur post line by line, and expect you read my post in the same way....
mediator said:
I supported u previously because u had a point. U liked my post because I supported u and u thought I was sensible enough. But dont get me wrong this time. I support ur views now also but not the "laws" thing.
Debates like this are meant to tell ur thoughts about the topic. Other debaters shud understand what the person is trying to say before speaking his own thoughts!
I didnt like your post because you supported me but because you gave a reading to it and replied with lot of sense. I respect people who have open mind and are open to discussions and debate and so I respect u a lot bro!
mediator said:
Suppose if some hindus or christians criticise islam, then its understood that u'll get angry. But rather u shud think why are they criticing? Similarly if some Muslims crtitices other hindus. The matter shud be thought of in the same way!
I totally agree with u on this! :)
mediator said:
Try to think about what I said. I appreciate u didnt made personal comments and burst off because of misunderstanding but rather tried to defend ur community!
Thanks for understanding that I was only defending and not preaching or offending someone.
mediator said:
I expect muslims like u to give a fitting answer to people like Osama and countries like Pakistan and tell them that their attempts wont succeed and wont bring any communal violence!
Yes I and all Indian Muslims (there may be a few uneducated exceptions as there are black sheeps in every religion) stand against a Terrorist country like Pakistan and also against all violence happening anywhere in the world for any damn reason.

Thanks for reading patiently, would like to hear more comments and clarifications from u soon, Thanks! :)
 

praka123

left this forum longback
fight terrorism out of India and world without taking out religious sentiments.thats what every country needed to do even Islamic Countries also.anyways after the US attack on Afganisthan,and warnings for militant bases at pakistan from US,somehow made the terrorist establishment lesser as u can see Kashmir is getting Better after these foreign terrorist/infiltrators are less in number.


Basically i think the believers in Ganga-Jamuna delta are much better than their counterparts in saud and middle east as a whole.they are having better skills on all arts and are more liberal earlier.
*www.milligazette.com/Archives/2004/01-15Dec04-Print-Edition/011512200426.htm

anyways i believe Hindus,Buddhist,Jainism and Roman Catholic/Orthodox Christianity are very very tolerant religions.they allows other religions and foreign peoples in their land and gave them the privilages of the country to these foreigners also.
*www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-478/_nr-297/i.html
 

Yamaraj

The Lord of Death
imranais said:
Rules of religion are bound to be followed. I am not preaching religion here but in Islam, Drinking is prohibited, there is a reason for it isn't it? No true muslim will ever go and drink, if he does he is no more a muslim. In Islam, No man can have illegal sex before marriage or sex with other women after marriage. The Islamic Law states that if a man is found guilty of such a crime he should be stoned to death.
Then how many real muslims are there in the World? Religious rules are pathetic
ideological ramblings of a perfectionist schizophreniac, most of the times. And
I'm not talking about any specific religion. Manu Smruti is equally laughable, as
are Old/New Testaments. Any normal and sane person wouldn't even follow
half the rules imposed by any religion whatsoever.

Remember, Islam, or any other religion, doesn't predate the evolution of mankind.
Religions exist to serve one purpose only - to differentiate and discriminate.
For what other reason one would place his sword at the neck of another and
ask him to accept his ideology or die? Obviously hatred!

No other religion ever had provision to make others pay taxes, if they didn't
already convert, or die as 'infidels'. Violence and hatred are integral to Islam.
The whole of Islamic history is full of violence and hatred towards others. The
same cannot be said about Hinduism (even if I don't consider it a religion) and
Buddhism or Jainism.

You cannot boast of peace in the name of Islam, for peace and Islam don't
quite fit together. It's an oxymoron. Why don't you spend some time explaining
this verse to me, in terms of peace?

From Qur'an:
"I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike
off the very tips of their fingers!"

Any"thing" that preaches violence to its followers is not worthy of the title
"God", not does it even qualify for a sane person. It's pure terrorism.

I invite you and others to read the following articles and form your own
'independent' opinion, one not directed by the mass media or "prophets".

1. Where is the Gandhi of Islam? - *www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/07/09/do09.xml&page=1
2. Muhammad was a terrorist - *answering-islam.org/Silas/terrorism.htm
3. Islamic extremist terrorism - *en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_extremist_terrorism

There is no place for senseless religious violence in today's World. If you can't
get rid of your Dark Ages' beliefs, at least learn to live in a civilized democratic
society.
 

JGuru

Wise Old Owl
America did & continues to dominate & dictate terms to the entire World. What America
did in the Middle East is not correct. They meddled with the internal affairs of other
nations, bombed Japan, killed millions in the Muslim countries. And now Bin Laden
thought Enough is enough, let's fight America at their own terms!!.
And that's when they (Al Qaeda) planned & executed 9/11 attacks in America.
Al Qaeda gave the Americans the taste of their own medicine!!!
This war between the Muslim world & the Christian world will continue for long.
Even if Bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda has become a very stronger force to reckon
with & will continue to give more nightmares to America.
 

mediator

Technomancer
imranais said:
No bro you talk sense so I am not getting u wrong! All laws are applicable for all citizens of India. No criminal of India is treated as per his/her religion. No one is above the Law in India. Having said that there are a few exceptions for everyone. This is because there are some laws such as Inheritance rights, marriage, divorce etc are different in Muslim laws based on teachings of Qur'an and teachings of the prophet. With regards to partiality, one cannot tell a Sikh to wear a Helmet bec its compulsory by law, there are exeptions. There is no theory which can legitimately argue that people are going to be more integrated simply because they are governed by a uniform civil code. For example, even though Hindus and Sikhs have the same personal laws, the anti-Sikhs riots took place in 1984. What happened to national integration in this case? Similarly, no one can say with certainty that Hindus and Muslims will stop reaching for each other’s necks if there is a Uniform Civil Code UCC in place. So why argue about this point as these would also put extra burden on already full of burden courts. Cases such as Inheritance, divorce etc which are given on judgement in days by Shariat courts, if goto courts will take years...
Why do u want Sikh to wear helments bro...when they already have natural, much efficient helmets? Helmets are for ur security though I believe its the opposite.....but the laws shud be equal for everyone! Suppose there's a killer. Then what do u expect, the laws shud be different for him if he's from a different religion? As for burden on court thats their problem. If cases are to be solved like this then no wonder every religion will demand its own laws on Inheritance,divorce etc! This will certainly lead to isolation and difference between the communities. And what can happen next? => Disintegration of country based on religions! A jain country with its own laws, islamic country and hindu country with their own laws.
Next, the muslim tourists will migrate to jain country and hindu country and hindu will migrate other religion country. Then after few years further disintegration! I hope u got my point!
You may give some more examples other than the Sikh, but they have got a better helmet! So dont say they dont wear helmet! Neways just like Sikhs gave up their main thing like turbans etc in France cant Muslims do the same in democratic Society? I'm not saying to give up everything. SIkhs gave up everything in France, I have mah sympathy with them. But atleast the laws and to maintain the spirit of Democracy! Because of these laws and differences India was partitioned to India and Pakistan. Do u want a partition again? So why shud u have separate laws?

imranais said:
Rules of religion are bound to be followed. I am not preaching religion here but in Islam, Drinking is prohibited, there is a reason for it isn't it? No true muslim will ever go and drink, if he does he is no more a muslim. In Islam, No man can have illegal sex before marriage or sex with other women after marriage. The Islamic Law states that if a man is found guilty of such a crime he should be stoned to death. Imagine if this law is implemented in any country, will any person commit heinous crime of Rape, he would fear his life and the torture of getting stoned to death in public. There are many laws which are logical and for betterment of life, if I start listing it would probably take pages.
Drinking,Sex before Marriage etc do not come under any specific religion! These are not laws! In any Indian family non-drinking,virgin before marriage are called family values,ethics,culturedness etc. For western society its different. They dont have any culture! SO dont compare India to western society. Western society is a big joke itself!
Do u think just because of these rules,islamic rules as u say ...muslim girls and boys dont drink? Do u think they dont have sex before marriages? These scandals come on net everyday. And not to metnion Pakistani sex scandals are rising faster than Indian sex scandals! Its easy to say such stuff! But every where even in hardcore Islamic societies like Iran drinking happens if not openly then privately, sex before marriage does happen! Its upto the family background and family values that are embedded in girls and boys that forbids them not to drink in parties! Every mother tells her child not to drink etc! So non-drinking etc is not something preached by Almighty alone, it is preached by every mother irrelevant of the fact whether she is religios or non-religious and was preached even before religion started!

If anybody starts preaching these things at mass level to ignorant,non-religious uneducate people and tribal areas then I'm sure he can start a different religion all by himslef!

I still say these are not religious rules but a part of culture,tradition u can say,ethics etc! I wud like u to mention somemore points if u have to convince me that religion is indeed a set of rules that need to be practised to improve ur life without degrading the life of others!


imranais said:
Islam gives equal rights to women as compared to men. Western talk of women’s liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of exploitation of her body, degradation of her soul, and deprivation of her honour. Western society claims to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers, hidden behind the colourful screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture’.
Again ur comparing it with stupid western society. I can give tons of examples. In western society if u are stayig with ur parents together then ur considered extremely blessed. This is their situation. So dont bring western society here! If women are treated equally then why are do they made burqa? Arent they allowed to absorb Sunlight equally as muslim men do? Another example is Sania Mirza. Why are muslims so concerned about her dress? Shudnt they just watch her sports instead of her dress? Do muslims want a separate rule for that too?

imranais said:
It seems u are a vegetarian...
Humans have Omnivorous set of teeth
If you observe the teeth of herbivorous animals like the cow, goat and sheep, you will find something strikingly similar in all of them. All these animals have a set of flat teeth i.e. suited for herbivorous diet. If you observe the set of teeth of the carnivorous animals like the lion, tiger, or leopard, they all have a set of pointed teeth i.e. suited for a carnivorous diet. If you analyze the set of teeth of humans, you find that they have flat teeth as well as pointed teeth. Thus they have teeth suited for both herbivorous as well as carnivorous food i.e. they are omnivorous. One may ask, if Almighty God wanted humans to have only vegetables, why did He provide us also with pointed teeth? It is logical that He expected us to need and to have both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food.
Human beings can digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food
The digestive system of herbivorous animals can digest only vegetables. The digestive system of carnivorous animals can digest only meat. But the digestive system of humans can digest both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. If Almighty God wanted us to have only vegetables then why did He give us a digestive system that can digest both vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food?
Even plants have life
Certain religions have adopted pure vegetarianism as a dietary law because they are totally against the killing of living creatures. If a person can survive without killing any living creature, I would be the first person to adopt such a way of life. In the past people thought plants were lifeless. Today it is a universal fact that even plants have life. Today science tells us that even plants can feel pain. But the cry of the plant cannot be heard by the human being. This is due to the inability of the human ear to hear sounds that are not in the audible range i.e. 20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz. Anything below and above this range cannot be heard by a human being. Thus their logic of not killing living creatures is not fulfilled even by being a pure vegetarian.
If every human being was a vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation of cattle in the world, since their reproduction and multiplication is very swift. Allah (swt) in His Divine Wisdom knows how to maintain the balance of His creation appropriately. No wonder He has permitted us to have the meat of the cattle. It is mentioned in Manu Smruti, the law book of Hindus, in chapter 5 verse 30
"The eater who eats the flesh of those to be eaten does nothing bad, even if he does it day after day, for God himself created some to be eaten and some to be eater."
Oh man u took it to the root level! Wow. Neways yes u deduced correctly. I'm A VEGETARIAN :D! Neways just like u said

Code:
I dont listen or let anyone rule by life like you said, if it matches with the Qur'an and teachings of Prophet it is to be followed or it is simply to be Rejected no matter which cleric has said or modified it.

Similarly I dont follow anyone not even religious books! Though I have read all the Hindu epics and GITA, but I only learn from them if they have anything new to say and increases my wisdom! Believe me I dont follow any book blindly! I dont wanna talk about the teaching of some other religion other than mine. I just like to observe my religion and deduce whats right and whats wrong. IF u ask I can tell about othe religions too. But it wud be better if u urself deduce whats right and whats wrong in ur religion.
Just because Islam is ur religion and ur forefather have told u not to question the authourity of religious leaders and all, doesnt means u shud stop doing so. U shud question everything, even the rights and wrongs of ur religion and remeber is the power of question from where everyone has achieved wisdom and real spiritual knowledge!


Neways for this post I just wanna say Almighty has given us power to think constructively and destructively like u said about teeth their use! So shud we start thinking destructively too? He gave us power to save people and to kill them. Shud we start killing too?
So forget about what ur religion has said. At the end its upto u to use ur brain and decide whether its right and wrong!

Neways yes plant have life like animals. But they arent classified to Plants and animals for no reason! The categories: herbivore,carnivore : right and wrong arent classified for no reason!
I agree about the concept of eater and being eaten! BUt again if u eat, then only u kill an animal. If someone attacks ur brutally then only u kill him in return.
U shudnt kill any animal,goats etc just like that for the sake of religion and to please almighty. I similarly criticise the Tantriks who still live in dark ages and sacrifice even human being to please Almighty. Whats the difference between them and u then? We are supposed to be living in modern era. Why shud we practise what was done in dark ages that is higly irrational an unscientific? Do u think slaughtering animals like goats can bring happiness? Think again its opposite actually.

What u perform, what u do is how accordingly ur outlook towards life develops and becomes! Its not what I say, Its what all mothers and religious gods say and I agree with them!

imranais said:
I didnt like your post because you supported me but because you gave a reading to it and replied with lot of sense. I respect people who have open mind and are open to discussions and debate and so I respect u a lot bro!
Thanx for understanding bro!

Lets continue this interesting debate. And thanx for reading mah posts and quoting everyline line by line! Not many ppl are here who that.

Cheers! :)
 

ruthless

Lin Win Mac
America has created the terrorist like Bin Laden. Now they are trying to kill him because they are afraid of what he would say if he is caught alive. If he speaks ,they will be in trouble.

I read somewhere that The Holy Bible and Quran contains same message and the events in both of the holy books are similer.(PLZ correct me if i m wrong.)

@yamraj U must not forget that only a minority of muslims become anti-social.I know many muslims who are very patriotic .
Why should we go further , our own president Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam is a muslim and no one can deny his contribution to our nation.

:)

@imranais- I thought vegetarian was the healthiest way of living. You must understand that plants have the ability to replaca their lost parts. If they feel the pain how will the seeds be dispersed for continuation of their species.
 
Last edited:

Yamaraj

The Lord of Death
ruthless said:
@yamraj U must not forget that only a minority of muslims become anti-social.I know many muslims who are very patriotic .
Why should we go further , our own president Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam is a muslim and no one can deny his contribution to our nation.

:)
Exactly! I do have respect for APJ, but that is because he is not a religious
fanatic. Like I've said a million times before, I've nothing personal against muslims.
I dislike religious fundamentalists, irrespective of their religion. I dislike those
who kill people and take lives of innocent animals and still try to argue or
justify it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nix

king007

In the zone
mediator said:
Why do u want Sikh to wear helments bro...when they already have natural, much efficient helmets? Helmets are for ur security though I believe its the opposite.....but the laws shud be equal for everyone! Suppose there's a killer. Then what do u expect, the laws shud be different for him if he's from a different religion?
Thats what I said all Indians are bound by same laws. A Muslim Killer gets the same punishment as a Hindu killer or any other killer. There is no differentiation at all. Except a few exceptions as I said which exists for different religions.
mediator said:
As for burden on court thats their problem. If cases are to be solved like this then no wonder every religion will demand its own laws on Inheritance,divorce etc! This will certainly lead to isolation and difference between the communities. And what can happen next? => Disintegration of country based on religions! A jain country with its own laws, islamic country and hindu country with their own laws.
Has the disintegration happened in 58 years of India's independence? These exceptions in laws are part of Indian constition. And like I said in previous posts having UCC does not mean unity..
mediator said:
Because of these laws and differences India was partitioned to India and Pakistan. Do u want a partition again? So why shud u have separate laws?
Partition of India was the biggest mistake. If these two countries were one, we would have been a superpower by now. The amount of money these two countries spend to safeguard thier borders is just unimaginable...
mediator said:
Drinking,Sex before Marriage etc do not come under any specific religion! These are not laws! In any Indian family non-drinking,virgin before marriage are called family values,ethics,culturedness etc. For western society its different. They dont have any culture! SO dont compare India to western society. Western society is a big joke itself!
I agree Western Society is just degrading Human value and advertising it as Liberalisation of Socialism.
mediator said:
Do u think just because of these rules,islamic rules as u say ...muslim girls and boys dont drink? Do u think they dont have sex before marriages? These scandals come on net everyday. And not to metnion Pakistani sex scandals are rising faster than Indian sex scandals! Its easy to say such stuff! But every where even in hardcore Islamic societies like Iran drinking happens if not openly then privately, sex before marriage does happen! Its upto the family background and family values that are embedded in girls and boys that forbids them not to drink in parties! Every mother tells her child not to drink etc! So non-drinking etc is not something preached by Almighty alone, it is preached by every mother irrelevant of the fact whether she is religios or non-religious and was preached even before religion started!
I completely agree with u, but in Muslims drinking is a big taboo and as I said there are black sheeps in every religion, so muslims who drink or do other forbidden activities are not muslims at all or muslims only by name.
mediator said:
If women are treated equally then why are do they made burqa? Arent they allowed to absorb Sunlight equally as muslim men do?
An Example: Suppose two sisters who are twins, and who are equally beautiful, walk down the street. One of them is attired in the Islamic hijaab i.e. the complete body is covered, except for the face and the hands up to the wrists. The other sister is wearing western clothes, a mini skirt or shorts. Just around the corner there is a hooligan or ruffian who is waiting for a catch, to tease a girl. Whom will he tease? The girl wearing the Islamic Hijaab or the girl wearing the skirt or the mini? Naturally he will tease the girl wearing the skirt or the mini. Such dresses are an indirect invitation to the opposite sex for teasing and molestation. The Qur’an rightly says that hijaab prevents women from being molested. And Burkha is to safeguard women and her modesty and in no way meant to degrade her. Women who do understand Islam will wear a Burkha even if her husband/parents stop her. Burkha is not a forced garment but a recommended garment.
mediator said:
Another example is Sania Mirza. Why are muslims so concerned about her dress? Shudnt they just watch her sports instead of her dress? Do muslims want a separate rule for that too?
There are only a few people who give comments about her, and these are the people who want to get fame by giving such comments or mediating in affairs where they are not even invited or required.
mediator said:
Oh man u took it to the root level! Wow. Neways yes u deduced correctly. I'm A VEGETARIAN :D!
So u kill plants to eat them. Now u may say plants have less senses than animals so killing plants is ok compared to killing animals...
Suppose your brother is born deaf and dumb and has two senses less as compared to other human beings. He becomes mature and someone murders him. Would you ask the judge to give the murderer a lesser punishment because your brother has two senses less? In fact you would say that he has killed a masoom, an innocent person, and the judge should give the murderer a greater punishment.
If a person can survive without killing any living creature, I would be the first person to adopt such a way of life. And the ecological balance created by God is in such a way that the animals which he has allowed to eat will never become extinct no matter how many u consume of them.
mediator said:
Just because Islam is ur religion and ur forefather have told u not to question the authourity of religious leaders and all, doesnt means u shud stop doing so. U shud question everything, even the rights and wrongs of ur religion and remeber is the power of question from where everyone has achieved wisdom and real spiritual knowledge!
I do question about things and do not believe in blind faith. I even reasearch to find an answer. Also I believe in Islam not because I am born muslim but because it coincides with Logic and Science. With no offence to any other religion I can never believe that a Idol made by a human being to be God, God is something unimaginable we cannot create a idol, a picture or anything of him. And in Islam I have to only believe that there is only 1 God who has power to all.
The basic difference between Islam and Hinduism which I believe is of apostrophe S ('s). Hindus say Fire is God, sun is God, Moon is God etc etc and Muslims say everything is of God's.
mediator said:
Neways for this post I just wanna say Almighty has given us power to think constructively and destructively like u said about teeth their use! So shud we start thinking destructively too? He gave us power to save people and to kill them. Shud we start killing too?
So forget about what ur religion has said. At the end its upto u to use ur brain and decide whether its right and wrong!
I completely agree with u bro. Nuclear Power can be used for constructive purposes also but we human made it destructive and created Nuclear bombs. We have to think about right and wrong.... I agree with u....
mediator said:
U shudnt kill any animal,goats etc just like that for the sake of religion and to please almighty. I similarly criticise the Tantriks who still live in dark ages and sacrifice even human being to please Almighty. Whats the difference between them and u then?
The difference is that Tantriks believe that God requires meat and Blood to accept their prayers and Qur’ân clearly states that unlike some other religions who believe that Almighty God requires meat and blood, in Islam when we sacrifice an animal neither the blood nor the meat reaches God but it is our piety, intentions, and righteousness while sacrificing that is taken into consideration.
That is the reason when a sacrifice of an animal is made during Eedul-Duha (Bakri-Eed) 1/3rd portion of the animal has to be given in charity to the poor people1/3rd has to be distributed amongst relatives and friends. A maximum of 1/3rd portion may be kept for the personal household consumption.
No portion of the animal's flesh or blood is kept separately for Almighty God, because he does not require it. Thus We dont slaughter a Goat and offer Meat and Blood to God to please him.
mediator said:
We are supposed to be living in modern era. Why shud we practise what was done in dark ages that is higly irrational an unscientific? Do u think slaughtering animals like goats can bring happiness? Think again its opposite actually.
Exactly it does not bring happiness but what is lawful to be eaten can be eaten and should be eaten....
If every human being was a vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation of cattle in the world, since their reproduction and multiplication is very swift. God in His Divine Wisdom knows how to maintain the balance of His creation appropriately. No wonder He has permitted us to have the meat of the cattle.
mediator said:
Thanx for understanding bro!
Lets continue this interesting debate. And thanx for reading mah posts and quoting everyline line by line! Not many ppl are here who that.
Cheers! :)
Thanks for reading my replies line by line too... :) Plz let me know if I unintensionally hurt any of ur feelings, If I did then I sincerely apologize.
 

king007

In the zone
Re: I have few Words on Terrorism

hdsk.23 said:
"ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORIST,
BUT ALL TERRORIST ARE MUSLIMS"

Who said bro? The Biggest Terrorist "Mr. Bush" is not a muslim!

Also read post #11(*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showpost.php?p=312434&postcount=11) of this thread where I have posted "Facts and Only Facts" .

Do read it before making such statements!
 

praka123

left this forum longback
the main thing is Hindus started understanding more about the destruction made by foreigners to this very ancient civilization fetching from Iran to Indonesia(Aarsha Bharath) mostly due to those parties like RSS,VHP etc going to remote areas and making ppl understand the amount of destruction made by these ppl.this makes an average hindu (hindus are most of them i believe are very moderate and coordial to others) getting anger on the past deeds of these foreigners;I mean Islam missionaries and warlords who came to conquer india.but even if hindus are calm and forgives these troubles,Moslems who are educated from madarssas remember them of the dark ages.i am not a Hindu.but believe me,Hindustan is a wonder which survived umpteen intrusion by Islamists and Others for the past 1000 years losing millions of precious lives.mind it any moslems for that matter be able to understand the following link:
*www.howardbloom.net/militant_islam_timeline.htm
below will show some....light on "World Religion"origin:
*www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/554692/posts
 

deepak.krishnan

In the zone
Well this news is going to be purely fake!!! It is being reported that Laden has a team of leading doctors with him all the time and he wont die of a mere typhoid!
 

mediator

Technomancer
imranais said:
Thats what I said all Indians are bound by same laws. A Muslim Killer gets the same punishment as a Hindu killer or any other killer. There is no differentiation at all. Except a few exceptions as I said which exists for different religions.
Bro, These are the few exceptions I'm talking about because of which there is divide between Islam and other religions. These are the few exceptions because of which most people think Muslims are terrorist minded, want to have separate country all the time, cant exist peacefully with other religions and cant coexist with National laws!
India was divided as I said because of these laws only. India at that time had much great percentage of Muslim population who wanted separate State. Who knows if population of Indian Muslims rises, there can be another partition.
And these are not exceptions, these are sparking points of communal tensions.

Everybody wants population of India to decrease so as to reduce all population related problems like unemployment,poverty etc. For this family planning was thought of. Why did the muslims oppose this? Arent they interested in contributing,solving national problems?
Most muslim families have not less than 3 kids. These families arent able to feed their kids. And then go poor. Then they say govenrment is not doing enough for them. Who is responsible? Them or the governemnt? If they follow laws equally dont u think it will be good for everyone? No more communal tensions I mean and no more population explosions.

Also to maintain equality dont u think subjects such as "Muslim Quota", "Muslim Reservation", "Muslim Vote" shud be abolished??

Dont u think the gap and partiality is rising enough?? Dont u think Muslims are being selfish to have everything for their comfort i.e first the exceptional LAWS as u said , second RESERVATION FOR MUSLIMS , third asking their community members to elect a governement of their common choice so that it will do more good for MUSLIMS ALONE i.e MUSLIMS VOTE ?? And at the end most of them still say they are suffering in India to gain some more priviledges and gain sympathy!! Dont u think its tooo much??

imranais said:
Has the disintegration happened in 58 years of India's independence? These exceptions in laws are part of Indian constition. And like I said in previous posts having UCC does not mean unity..
I dont agree with this!
Will u keep saying this until disintegration has actually happened? Its similar to thing that is lost. most people dont realise the importance of thing until its lost. And then try to get it back when its lost.
Isnt the history witness that we were actually partitioned? How u know it wont happen again?
5-10 years after partition everyone was sad. No communal tensions were there. 10-20 years the differences again started to rise. Now we see communal tensions every year! How can u be sure partition wont happen? Cant u learn from the past and be convinced until the partition has actually taken place? Its a different matter tha most of us dont want a partition, but how many broadminded/educated people are there in the country? or as @yamaraj said how many REAL muslims are there in the country?

imranais said:
I completely agree with u, but in Muslims drinking is a big taboo and as I said there are black sheeps in every religion, so muslims who drink or do other forbidden activities are not muslims at all or muslims only by name.
How can u say they are not Muslims? They must be practising Islam more than u do! Every mother says not to drink or smoke. But if a child does so, is he no longer her kid?
Most Muslims say interacting with other religion members is alo UnIslamic! So for them u must be UnIslamic then! As I said these are no laws but ethics. If think in broader terms, they are only loosing their ethics by drinking and defaming their families!

imranais said:
An Example: Suppose two sisters who are twins, and who are equally beautiful, walk down the street. One of them is attired in the Islamic hijaab i.e. the complete body is covered, except for the face and the hands up to the wrists. The other sister is wearing western clothes, a mini skirt or shorts. Just around the corner there is a hooligan or ruffian who is waiting for a catch, to tease a girl. Whom will he tease? The girl wearing the Islamic Hijaab or the girl wearing the skirt or the mini? Naturally he will tease the girl wearing the skirt or the mini. Such dresses are an indirect invitation to the opposite sex for teasing and molestation. The Qur’an rightly says that hijaab prevents women from being molested. And Burkha is to safeguard women and her modesty and in no way meant to degrade her. Women who do understand Islam will wear a Burkha even if her husband/parents stop her. Burkha is not a forced garment but a recommended garment.
imranais said:
There are only a few people who give comments about her, and these are the people who want to get fame by giving such comments or mediating in affairs where they are not even invited or required.
Nops, I disagree here again! If a sex hungry freak really wants to tease then he wont look for such things! Now let me rephrase ur example!
Suppose the burqa girl is walking in a lonely street full of sex hungry freaks. What will u think? SHe'll get out of there without any misery? Even a 3 month old child girl,a girl in saree or salwar kameez is raped these days so why will they care about Burqa?

And why arent there any dances and other happy thing in Muslim festivals except for feast? Dances,Living openly in the SUN during winters etc are some of things Women enjoy the most. Why is it most Muslim girls are so desparate to learn Bharat Natiyam? I'm not saying this, but I was surprised to see it on news channels some months ago. If u think I'm making stories then let me tell u I dont like to talk absurd and dont expect the same from opponent! Nobody must be reading and watching news like I do!

imranais said:
So u kill plants to eat them. Now u may say plants have less senses than animals so killing plants is ok compared to killing animals...
Neways u been talking and emphasising a lot on plants. I told u plants and animals are different categories and arent classified for no reasons!

So now let me tell u ......A living form is said to feel pain and suffering if it has a NERVOUS SYSTEM. Birds,animals,humans all have nervous systems. They can sense pain. On the other hand, Plants dont have NERVOUS SYSTEM. And yes they dont feel pain. This was not mine but a scientific definition.

( and this definition of plants having "no senses" is used in serials and cartoons to like "Flames of Recca". Watch it to get enlightened => Episode Number: 26, Animax, 8 pm,12 am or 10am :D )

If they wud have felt pain then
1. cud u explain me the concept of autumn, why leaves themselves shrink and then reappear during springs.
2. Cud u explain me why dont the plant die even when break a branch of it?
3. Even if we take out from roots, it doesnt shred for 1-2 days??

List is endless! I can fill the whole page on this! So dont say plants have senses! As I said classifications like herbivore and carnivore, plants and animals, arent made for no reason and I told u to think about this ! Neways I told u now....I hope u wont feel pity for plants anymore. But yea every thing has its own importance. Plants provode us O2. So next time before cutting a tree think again :) !

Some scientists say plants have life, others say plants dont have life. Some say it has life because it grows! Others say then NAILS,HAIR must be having life tooo as they can grow too after the person dies!
Neways vegetarian food also has POTATOES, CEREALS,BEANS and plenty of other things that dont have life at all !

I hope u got my point and i hope u wont argue to me or anybody now that plants are KILLED or HAVE SENSES after forwarding such a brief, to the point scientific lesson to u!

AND u shudnt talk about anything like plants on which ur ignorant! See I didnt talk about Sharia at all! Neways WHo told u plants have senses?? Muslim leaders/clerics??

imranais said:
If a person can survive without killing any living creature, I would be the first person to adopt such a way of life.
Now why did u say CREATURE urself???? Plants dont come under the category of CREATURE!! I hope u got my point. I told u to understand the difference between plants and animals and understand about their classifications. But u didnt!! This really lowers the spirit of a good,peaceful discussion.

I see u only brought "Plants" in the discussion to defend the slaughtering of goats though u were ignorant about plants!!

Yes a person can live without killing any living CREATURE by simply being a VEGETARIAN and eating beans,cereals,milk,potato........shud I make a list for u ????!!!!

SO ARE U READY TO ADOPT SUCH A WAY OF LIFE AND TELL OTHER MEMBERS OF UR COMMUNITY THE SAME???? U promised now, dont take a U-Turn from ur promise as it wud be UnIslamic :)!!


imranais said:
Suppose your brother is born deaf and dumb and has two senses less as compared to other human beings. He becomes mature and someone murders him. Would you ask the judge to give the murderer a lesser punishment because your brother has two senses less? In fact you would say that he has killed a masoom, an innocent person, and the judge should give the murderer a greater punishment.
Bro, Can u please elaborate on the relevance of this example here??? Having the ability to feel/sense is different from having the ability to see or hear!!!! Dont be so confused!! DO I need to enlighten a guy like u on such a simple thing??
First in ur first post u talk about about wars and terrorism in the same meaning!! NExt u show the same confusion here ???



imranais said:
I do question about things and do not believe in blind faith. I even reasearch to find an answer. Also I believe in Islam not because I am born muslim but because it coincides with Logic and Science. With no offence to any other religion I can never believe that a Idol made by a human being to be God, God is something unimaginable we cannot create a idol, a picture or anything of him. And in Islam I have to only believe that there is only 1 God who has power to all.
Religion in YOUR definition is an organization and a set of rules as u say. So in ur definition I'm not much religiously devoted and wud like to die if I had such a religion made of rules that u had to follow! I dont visit temples much. For me my parents are like GOD to me. Its because of them I exist and continue to exist not because of ALMIGHTY!
So I wud like to make an idol of them or embedd them/their picture in my heart. So u see there is nothing wrong in idol worship. The one who u worship, u shud actually have a picture of him/her in u heart!

imranais said:
The basic difference between Islam and Hinduism which I believe is of apostrophe S ('s). Hindus say Fire is God, sun is God, Moon is God etc etc and Muslims say everything is of God's.
Who told u Hindus think like that??? Stupid serials??? U said Media is stupid to potray Muslims as terrorist! Then let me say Media is stupid for this tooo!
Islam is just some 1000-2000 yrs old religion (The prophet Muhammad (circa 570-632 A.D.) introduced Islam in 610 A.D.). But do u know, Hinduism is ALMOST as old as Earth?? U may laugh on this, as most do! U may say how ALMOST old as earth? But this is what he fact is. Hinduism is the oldest religion on the earth.( For me religion is not an organization but a form of spirituality based on facts ). And as time passes by, facts are twisted as u know! If ur grandfather says a secret like "Some sheep give wool" ( i know this is wierd exampl) and asks the coming generations to hide this fact in their minds, then ur great reat great......great grandson might get this fact twisted as "ALL sheep give wool". I hope u got my point.
So as generations passed by facts about Hinduism have twisted! So I only believe only in Epics,Mahabharat,GITA and the VEDAS!! As they are the only thing that are real now.
There may already be sme twisting in ISLAM already who knows!

To tell u Hinduism is all about 3 Gods : Brahma(the creator), Vishnu(the preserver) and the Shiva (the destructor).
Some think whatever is happening in the world is just a dream seen by Vishnu! If anything wrong happens he takes avatars!
GITA says there are 10 avatars of Lord Vishnu!
*members.tripod.com/~srinivasp/mythology/avatars.html
Read this thoroughly!
It is said that everything that has an origin has an end also (It is also said that MAtrix was based on Concept of Hinduism). The earth timeline is categorised into yugs. There are 4 total yugs each one of some lakhs years. Nobody has been able to understand this mystery yet. Some scientists argue that a yug must be more than that. Some say Earths rortation must be faster at that time. Thats why so many years must have elapsed!

Believe me so fire gods and whateva u say are just twists! The real things I explained u above! And if u dont believe into anything blindly then u shud be aware of origin of ur religion, u shud have facts to prove that prophet actually had an angelic visitation etc!
For hinduism we have all facts scientifically explained! For mahabharat and exist of Pandavas there are temples dating back to 1000 yrs ago in uttaranchal, in high mountains of himalayas! For Ramayan, we have the path created of stones connecting SriLanka and India. During recent Tsunamis many statues dating back to 1000 yrs were found waved in by the Tsunami waves! In all cases carbon dating and other scientific methods,process was applied to prove that they were really old. One more thing, GITA says the last avatar of Vishnu i.e Kalki will appear during the end of Kalyug. And according to GITA and modern science this is the Kalyug where the violence will be at its peak!!!
Do u have the same scientific explanations and facts for Islam??

We still have a few Vedas with us, which explains the cure of diabetes and all other diseases of which cure still hasnt be found in modern medical field!!!! U see american scientists were baffled and still are when they acknowledge such things from Hinduism! AND now the westerners psychos who thought themselves as the smartest and greatest are now actually researching on these Vedic techniques. So u see Vedic techniques,Yoga etc existed long before any other religion came on earth and much long before Modern Science even started!!

So I request u to stop talking about the differences between Hinduism and Islam as I can write pages endlessly on this!



imranais said:
The difference is that Tantriks believe that God requires meat and Blood to accept their prayers and Qur’ân clearly states that unlike some other religions who believe that Almighty God requires meat and blood, in Islam when we sacrifice an animal neither the blood nor the meat reaches God but it is our piety, intentions, and righteousness while sacrificing that is taken into consideration.
That is the reason when a sacrifice of an animal is made during Eedul-Duha (Bakri-Eed) 1/3rd portion of the animal has to be given in charity to the poor people1/3rd has to be distributed amongst relatives and friends. A maximum of 1/3rd portion may be kept for the personal household consumption.
No portion of the animal's flesh or blood is kept separately for Almighty God, because he does not require it. Thus We dont slaughter a Goat and offer Meat and Blood to God to please him.
Yes here I agree, u think right about tantriks. U said u werent blindly follwing ur religion. But then arent u blindly following ur religion now?? Why do u need to kill goat?? Just for religion??
Religions are started after the WISE preachings of someone. That someone doest tells us to slaughter animals like goats or celebrate by burning crackers in his WISE preachings! Its only us who do so! DId prophet told to kill goat?? So how will u term this now except for BLIND FAITH ?? If this is not following ur religion blindly then what is it??

imranais said:
Exactly it does not bring happiness but what is lawful to be eaten can be eaten and should be eaten....
If every human being was a vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation of cattle in the world, since their reproduction and multiplication is very swift. God in His Divine Wisdom knows how to maintain the balance of His creation appropriately. No wonder He has permitted us to have the meat of the cattle.
Overpopulation of cattle?? So u started eating it?? What about DOGS and PIGS and CROWS?? They are also getting overly populated. Their multiplication is also very swift. GOD has also provided u with flesh of DOGS and PIGS. U'll find dogs every next street! So shudnt u be EATING them on this concept of urs ????
If u believe in this CONCEPT of urs blindly then shudn't u soon also be starting to eat the social animal i.e MAN and if u classify further on basis religion then a MUSLIM MAN (as they multiply more than any other religion and most have families not less than 3 kids)????

Dont get me wrong! But will u stop for a moment and stop thinking like "God in his divine wisdom or whateva". If u think God wants a balance then why dont u eat PIGS too and DOGS too? Do u want to deplete the earth of one specific animal category i.e cattle and disrupt the balance that the GOD in WISDOM wants?? In ur language I say "GOD has Given us the most important thing i.e the BRAINS to think whats wrong and right and made us the dominant species on earth" and "GOD wants u to use that brains to think harder and stop following what other say"!!!!


imranais said:
Thanks for reading my replies line by line too... Plz let me know if I unintensionally hurt any of ur feelings, If I did then I sincerely apologize.
Oh well! Guess our last lines are always the same! Do apologise me too If I hurt any of ur feelings !!! Thanx for reading and quoting my lines line by line. Lets continue this debate!! :)

CHeers!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom