AMD Vs. Intel, Which is Better?

Amd or Intel

  • Total voters
    115
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nish_higher

Wise Old Owl
The_Devil_Himself said:
Yea lets wait and see.
BTW when is this barcelona gonna be released?
Click to expand...

i dont think even AMD knows that :D
even if its released and if it performs better than intel (which it surely will) why do u think intel is not gonna release a new processor?i mean to say that by the time it gets settled intel will b ready with a new one.and this thread will keep running in circles.i prefer intel for quite stable prices they have.there's no steep fall there.like AMD-FX 55 was for 50000 bucks when i purhased.it was just a matter of monts for its price to fall to half.this is something i dont like while selling my stuff
 
The_Devil_Himself

The_Devil_Himself

die blizzard die! D3?
Nobody likes that nish.
I purchased my c2d when it was just launched in India and now it is not even priced half of what i purchased it for.BUT i am happy with it.

I think Intel is ready with their 45nm processors.
 
OP
entrana

entrana

M$™ Certified Spammer
amd can never compete with intel
in the end, amd is just a cheaper alternative to powerful processing that intel offers
 
N

nish_higher

Wise Old Owl
The_Devil_Himself said:
I purchased my c2d when it was just launched in India and now it is not even priced half of what i purchased it for
I think Intel is ready with their 45nm processors.
Click to expand...
whoa..!! which C2d? and when is intel releasing new processors?if its early i should wait for a mobo upgrade?
 
Garbage

Garbage

God of Mistakes...
entrana said:
amd can never compete with intel
in the end, amd is just a cheaper alternative to powerful processing that intel offers
Click to expand...

Grow up buddy !!! Where are you ?? Just think twice before writing !

AMD can never compete Intel? huh... Let me tell you, many of the AMD's processors performs better than their counterpart Intel...

And, Bcoz of AMD is cheap, Intel has to cheap!
Otherwise, it was really hard to get C2Ds <10Ks

Hope u understand what I mean ....
 
OP
entrana

entrana

M$™ Certified Spammer
what i meant was the most powerful processor of amd cant compete with the most powerful processory of intel, as of now lets see what the future holds for us
 
SockCucker

SockCucker

Banned
I know, but the cost effectiveness thing is not going to convince the enthusiasts.

Intel is way ahead of AMD in terms of performance. The Core 2 Quad Extreme
at stock will blow away any AMD make, including the FX-74. And the C2Q
extreme overclocked to 4.4 GHz (Ryan Gartner, highest score ever in 3dMark)
will...........forget it. I don't even want to compare.

But keep in mind I'm not an Intel fanboy. My CPU is a AMD 5200+. But facts
are facts, and I have no shame in stating that Intel is much better. Period.
 
shantanu

shantanu

Technomancer
@sockcucker : Intel is great make, thats no doubt.. 80% of the world uses INtel inside.. that fine.. but i know what capabilities AMD has.. AMD is also in the same league.. even if you compare PD orr C2D with many AMD proccys , AMD leads the way for Performance users.. (i mean people who look for good performance in a limited price range) and the FX-74 you are talking about has two CPU's and till date the motherboard made for it only has a single CPU support, that means half the performance.. and then AMD was the first to make a Quad CPU, and even a 64-bit.. in desktop market.. and even the inovation was also AMD's.

Well Both the makes originate from same country and are leading the world in Proccessor market..
I love both.. and can carry anytask on both.. but i am sure of one thing that AMD has better multitasking and overclocking capabilities.. :)
 
Who

Who

Guess Who's Back
i think you wrong here , they have already released the core 2 quad....as for cost of core 2 quad in india well first they hard to find & if find one they cost lot as for now, so waiting for barcelona should be the best bet untill the price falls for the core 2 quad .
 
SockCucker

SockCucker

Banned
shantanu said:
@sockcucker : Intel is great make, thats no doubt.. 80% of the world uses INtel inside.. that fine.. but i know what capabilities AMD has.. AMD is also in the same league.. even if you compare PD orr C2D with many AMD proccys , AMD leads the way for Performance users.. (i mean people who look for good performance in a limited price range) and the FX-74 you are talking about has two CPU's and till date the motherboard made for it only has a single CPU support, that means half the performance.. and then AMD was the first to make a Quad CPU, and even a 64-bit.. in desktop market.. and even the inovation was also AMD's.

Well Both the makes originate from same country and are leading the world in Proccessor market..
I love both.. and can carry anytask on both.. but i am sure of one thing that AMD has better multitasking and overclocking capabilities.. :)
Click to expand...

I totally agree with you, that AMD beats Intel when it comes to the price-to-performance ratio. No arguments there really, especially considering the 6400+.

But Shantanu, I was speaking from the perspective of an enthusiast. If one is after the pinnacle of performance, then I'm afraid Intel is the answer.

So, keeping in mind what you said, I'll conclude this:

AMD: Common man's winner
Intel: Enthusiasts' winner.

I hope you'll agree.
 
shantanu

shantanu

Technomancer
yeah i think you just repeated what is said.. Some time back... intel had no answers to X2 and FX series.. so they worked and developed the C2D and C2Quad series.. , now AMD is working and i am sure that theyw ill also coe up with something which will make it the enthusiast choice.

i am using Intel Quad core and i know that its what i want ! but then not everyone is a enthusiast. Your Points are upto mark, but that does not make AMD a 2nd grade thing is any ways.. :) and its just a discussion. not a fight :)
 
N

nish_higher

Wise Old Owl
shantanu said:
and the FX-74 you are talking about has two CPU's and till date the motherboard made for it only has a single CPU support, that means half the performance.. and then AMD was the first to make a Quad CPU, and even a 64-bit.. in desktop market.. and even the inovation was also AMD's.

Well Both the makes originate from same country and are leading the world in Proccessor market..
I love both.. and can carry anytask on both.. but i am sure of one thing that AMD has better multitasking and overclocking capabilities.. :)
Click to expand...

there are already boards for multiple FX-74s.u can use upto 4 cpus.check this-
www.tyan.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom