A question on piracy

Legit MS software poll

  • Licensed Windows only

    Votes: 5 15.2%
  • Licensed Office only

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Both licensed :-)

    Votes: 4 12.1%
  • Both unlicensed, piracy rulez!

    Votes: 24 72.7%

  • Total voters
    33
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Pirated Windows XP which I managed to activate and Register with MS Online without applying any Crack. :) ..Only Freewares are what I have legal, all others illegal. :D
 

karmanya

Journeyman
There was something i had done, that involved a tiny bit of registery tinkering that actually fooled MS's site into believing that my version was legit, unfortunately it doesnt work anymore.
 

praka123

left this forum longback
why not move to Linux?it got most applications and now most h/w support also.
with more ppl moving away from proprietary OS like windows and mac os x,we can have Linux -a community oriented OS.,that got more support from hardware vendors and freedom from monopolist,saves from piracy too :)

You are welcome :)
 

anshul

Journeyman
I have a very few Original software,though I am sorry for it but I can't help it for the cost to buy original is very high and I am just a student.

But I am sure that as the resources permit,I shall start shifting to original.
 

adi007

Youngling
There is no software in my computer which is legal...except the full paid softwares ocassionally given by Digit,PC world

Now it's not the Question why i use pirated stuff the Question is the great software companies which produce such a good number of softwares fails to provide sufficient protection to it..
I mean it's ridiculous...Just a couple of Google search and there u go..U will get the software

Even if i had the money i will never buy any software coz it's stupidity to spend $$ for the software which are couple of google search away

Regarding why more number of people don't use Linux is because of human nature
We always tend or like to obtain the things which costs for free or for a lesser price

I bet if linux was a paid OS then it would have been more popular and more number of people would use it illegally ...

Well thats what i think...
 

NucleusKore

TheSaint
If ntfs-3g and FUSE are fool proof and are able to read and write my existing 1 TB USB External Drive, I will completely shift to Ubuntu Hardy Heron.

AAAAAAAAh it's not so foolproof. I've has issues when I try to delete folders with a large number of files (400-500 files). One or two get stuck and refuse to go. I work around this by booting into windows-> Open Windows Power Shell-> chkdsk X: /F
where X is the drive letter of the concerned drive, and I have got errors (maybe once in 6 months) in the form of what looks like redundant entries of some sort in the file indices, referring to the files in question, which it deletes. After this, reboot to linux and delete the files normally.
 
OP
B

bhanja_Trinanjan

Broken In
So, here is my take on piracy

Hi,
Thanks for your enthusiasm and your responses.

A few years ago, I too used warez.

After sweating it out for two and a half years in the software industry, I have learnt to value the enormous effort that goes into creating intellectual property.

Yes, I proudly say that 90% of what's installed on my PC is legit :) To copy and crack stuff is simply equal to 'insult' people who created it in the first place with all their blood and sweat.

And piracy is also an enormous waste of time.

Piracy and counter-piracy mechanisms are always involved in a perennial race.

Crackers produce a crack/hack and Microsoft responds with a newer and better protection mechanism against it.

So, if you hack through Windows Update on day 1, you will be forced to hunt out another hack on day 2.

Otherwise, you would lose out on all the performance updates and bug and security fixes that are on offer from Microsoft

And any software without service packs/updates/performance fixes is just about half its true worth..

Software is over-priced... says who?

For a OEM copy of Vista, one pays around 4000-5000 bucks.. and an OS is not something that one is going to buy every year... So if you spread out the expense of owning an OS over its shelf-life of 3-5 years (XP has been around for a very long time), you have a cost of ownership that is justifiable and reasonable.

If you folks can spend several thousands on CPUs, graphics cards and motherboards, why do you think twice before getting a license that costs 5000 bucks?

Get your copy of windows licensed.. and just relax .. You have all the updates from Microsoft automatically installed on your system. No mad hunt for keygens/ serials/ hacks...

Complete peace of mind... & a system that's truly stable, reliable and available.

That's the way I look at things.

Up to you folks to decide whether I am talking sense.
 

legolas

Padawan
1) Why is this in QnA section?
2) What is a topic on "pirated/illegal" windows/office doing in this forum when a topic in "fight club" section itself was deleted ("Rapidshare vs torrents")??? :eek:
I never understand!!! :|
 

axxo

99.9% Idle
Re: So, here is my take on piracy

And piracy is also an enormous waste of time.

Piracy and counter-piracy mechanisms are always involved in a perennial race.

Crackers produce a crack/hack and Microsoft responds with a newer and better protection mechanism against it.

So, if you hack through Windows Update on day 1, you will be forced to hunt out another hack on day 2.

Otherwise, you would lose out on all the performance updates and bug and security fixes that are on offer from Microsoft

And any software without service packs/updates/performance fixes is just about half its true worth..

Software is over-priced... says who?

For a OEM copy of Vista, one pays around 4000-5000 bucks.. and an OS is not something that one is going to buy every year... So if you spread out the expense of owning an OS over its shelf-life of 3-5 years (XP has been around for a very long time), you have a cost of ownership that is justifiable and reasonable.

If you folks can spend several thousands on CPUs, graphics cards and motherboards, why do you think twice before getting a license that costs 5000 bucks?

Get your copy of windows licensed.. and just relax .. You have all the updates from Microsoft automatically installed on your system. No mad hunt for keygens/ serials/ hacks...

Complete peace of mind... & a system that's truly stable, reliable and available.

That's the way I look at things.

Up to you folks to decide whether I am talking sense.

There are Volume edition for oses available which once installed no crack updation is required then. But i still feel the cost for an os(or any other soft) in India isnt justified. A normal user who still run p3/p4 cant afford 5k to spend on an os when their whole system worth is not more than 10-12k. Once the cost is on par with US preferable around 500-1k the sales will be multipled. But its obviously not gonna happen and 3.14racy is gonna stay alive for ever.
 

Cool Buddy

Wise Old Owl
Well, i do uderstand that i should use original software, but consider this:

AMD X2 - Rs.3000
Motherboard - Rs. 3000
RAM - Rs. 1000
HDD - Rs. 2500
Monitor - Rs. 4000
Other components, u can guess.

Total Rs. 18000

Windows XP - 3000
Microsoft Office - Rs. 17000
Zonealarm - Rs. 2300 (only for 1 year)

Total - Rs. 22300

What shall I do?
 

praka123

left this forum longback
^so true :| Indeed,ppl will buy if a $29.999 software for Rs29 mostly!else....

^you should move onto alternate OS like Linux :)
 

Cool Buddy

Wise Old Owl
How can we buy software which costs me more than my computer itself.

here's a small incident. I love photography, but can't afford expensive cameras. So I got a canon powershot A460. When i used it I found the pictures were very noisy. So i searched for its reviews to check whether the camera was faulty or it was normal. On one site I found this written: "The pictures taken from this camera are very noisy, however the pictures cleared well in a high end image editing program. But I wonder whether a person buying a camera worth $200 will buy a software which is more expensive than the camera."

I guess he referred to photoshop.
 

kumarmohit

Technomancer
Hmm, The only non free or non freeware software that I use is Windows which I purchased. Other than that my tasks are easily done by freeware or free software. I do use Ashampoo products but I regard them as freeware here.
 

NucleusKore

TheSaint
How can we buy software which costs me more than my computer itself.

here's a small incident. I love photography, but can't afford expensive cameras. So I got a canon powershot A460. When i used it I found the pictures were very noisy. So i searched for its reviews to check whether the camera was faulty or it was normal. On one site I found this written: "The pictures taken from this camera are very noisy, however the pictures cleared well in a high end image editing program. But I wonder whether a person buying a camera worth $200 will buy a software which is more expensive than the camera."

I guess he referred to photoshop.

have you tried clearing them with THE GIMP?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom