Xbox 360 Vs. Playstation 3

sagargv said:
its nfs carbon.

ya it is NFS carbon.

screenshots are taken at 720p using component video cables. Users can adjust TV display settings to account for the color differences, but they did not modify the color levels in the images as wanted to preserve the original output as much as possible.
One clearly noticable thing is framerates(fps) generated by PS3 is way higher than Xbox360.
 

Zeeshan Quireshi

C# Be Sharp !
@parimal,
the most important thing is that in 4-5 Years time , when HD-DVD(or blue ray) does become the market leader and is easily accessible then i will go out and buy an HD-DVD(or blue ray) writer which at that time will retail for maximum Rs 3000(DVD writers now cost 1.7k average) .

why waste my money now , when the time comes i WILL buy a High definition media writer and enjoy then , for now Xobx 360 is best for gaming .
 

thrash_metal

In the zone
OKey ..some facts ... I'm a n00b when it comes to console gaming

was thinking of going for a console in a budget so the xbox 360 core system was on my mind .... the dealers here are quoting 20k (19990) is this pricing right ? Also Is the HDD an absolute must ? or can I also get the 64mb card instead ??? I will be using it on a Samsung Bordeux tv connected to a home theater .

Also while playing an FPS .. on what rate is the playability ? like on PC aiming is done with the mouse ... on a console how ??? Also please recomend me some xbox games . Couldnt go for PS3 as its way over budget 40k !!! Sorry if its a little offtopic .....
 

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
parimal_xp2003 said:
Here I am doing comparison by comparing the images.
The upper image is of PS3 while lower is of Xbox. I really don’t like to compare console by this way but some people have created doubt about graphics power of RXS of Sony. It is for them.

Comparison 1: *s203.photobucket.com/albums/aa104/parimal_xp2003/?action=view&current=1.jpg
In first image look those trees behind the car. Xbox couldn't handle the lighting effect as it fades across the trees but PS3 balanced it and produced sharper texture.

Comparison 2: *s203.photobucket.com/albums/aa104/parimal_xp2003/?action=view&current=2.jpg
In second image same problem with Xbox, couldn't handle lighting effect properly. The Xbox image looks much brighter but use-less.

Comparison 3: *s203.photobucket.com/albums/aa104/parimal_xp2003/?action=view&current=3.jpg
In third image look at the car. PS3 has better graphic. The focus of head lamp looks much real in PS3. Trees are looks far better than Xbox.

Comparison 4: *s203.photobucket.com/albums/aa104/parimal_xp2003/?action=view&current=4.jpg
In fourth image the mirror image in Xbox image looks like artificially created-Over brightness. It seems much real in PS3 image. Look at the green building. No need to say anything.

Despite of the fact that you have compated a sh1tty game for both consoles , other thing you have done is comparing them in wrong way. The pics you have are from gamespots this article :

*www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/index.html

Here comparison of other games is also given, just see the COD3 and Madden comparision. Go see them and dont just post half truth.

Both systems have fairly similar graphics in Need for Speed Carbon, but the Xbox 360 has better lighting while the PS3 has sharper textures. The 360 has better high dynamic range lighting in the Camaro image. We're not sure if the PS3 version blurs the background tree leaves on purpose, but it's another noticeable difference. The lighting in the street shot appears more realistic on the 360, but the building textures are sharper on the PS3. We also seem to be missing some lighting and a few landmarks in the rearview mirror of the PS3 version.





@GX , blu ray is a plus for sony and so is the cell procesor . But yes RSX is no match for Xenon.
The lower common denominator if PS3 SKU's is better than 360 . We wont see a game ever on HD-DVD when needed, nither lower end 360 has a HDD. Also Blu ray is currently Ahead of HD DVD in race , but we have to see what future holds.

and btw gx, quake wars is coming on PS3 too.


But my current experience with both the consoles on a HI def display was totally dissapointing, I played Lost planet on 360 and resistance on PS3 and both the games just look ok, as a PC gamer i have seen better things . I also played Project gotham Racing on 360 and the game looks so crap that if it was a PC game i would reject it in a minute. Besides all this dissapointing things the controls on a gamepad suck when you are playing a shooter , the Lost planet AI was made so dumb on purpose and the enemy was so slow to give time for the gamer to shoot them with the crappy anolog controller.

Never knew consoles are so sh1t.

PC Rules. it has Crysis and gears too.
 
Last edited:

gxsaurav

You gave been GXified
thrash_metal said:
was thinking of going for a console in a budget so the xbox 360 core system was on my mind .... the dealers here are quoting 20k (19990) is this pricing right ? Also Is the HDD an absolute must ? or can I also get the 64mb card instead ??? I will be using it on a Samsung Bordeux tv connected to a home theater .

Unless you plan to use XBOX LIve services for which you need a 512kbps + broadband for good service, there is no point going for the HD.

Also while playing an FPS .. on what rate is the playability ? like on PC aiming is done with the mouse ... on a console how ???

That depends on you & how u play.

and btw gx, quake wars is coming on PS3 too.

Ok

PC Rules. it has Crysis and gears too.

And doom 3,Quake 4, wold, HL2, :D
 

Zeeshan Quireshi

C# Be Sharp !
And consoles got Dead Or Alive , Resident Evil , Def Jam , GOD Of war , Tekken , Grand tourismo , Mario , Zelda , ..... and the list goes on
 

goobimama

 Macboy
PC gaming rules when it comes to detail levels, but it sucks when your card is top end card gets outdated every year...
 

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
Zeeshan Quireshi said:
And consoles got Dead Or Alive , Resident Evil , Def Jam , GOD Of war , Tekken , Grand tourismo , Mario , Zelda , ..... and the list goes on

yes it does, and i can put a long PC games list too. Not a problem .

Currently PC gamers have to suffer crappy console ports , If anyone has seen the PC only game 'Infernal' which i saw running on 1600x1200 resolution and full details on a mere 7300GT you know what sh1t splinter cell port was and same with the case of poop port of last spiderman game. games are being made for the cheap ass consoles because of which we PC gamers have to suffer ports, the game which can run easily on a lower config , we have to get a high end card to run the same.

All this bull crap is only because a PC can handle stupid ports.

goobimama said:
PC gaming rules when it comes to detail levels, but it sucks when your card is top end card gets outdated every year...

Cards get outdated because gaming evolves in PC every year.
 
Last edited:

goobimama

 Macboy
If only these ports stop. While oblivion runs at 1920*1200 on my PC, I couldn't get Colin McRae DiRT to run at a lowly 1024*768....
 

goobimama

 Macboy
^^ Also, for stuff like playing HD (WMV-HD) videos, it would be advisable to have a HDD. I think you can stream it off wifi, not sure, but I think a HDD would be better...
 

thrash_metal

In the zone
Ahh yes .... I know PC gaming is great .. but due to my eye problem I had to shift to a console !!! Also the question is the DVD drive .. region locked to 5 !! anyway I cn kill this ? Also as the HD DVD drive is not available here ... If i can get it from outside will it work on both PC and XBOX ?

was considering the PS3 as well .. but the huge price difference does make it quite no no .. also a Sony world dude said that the BL Drive has encountered problems .. (dunno what stuff he was on) he was recomending me a ps2 !!!! He also said that the BL drive can not be region free as it region locked permanantly ...sad point !
 
Last edited:

tarey_g

Hanging, since 2004..
thrash_metal said:
If i can get it from outside will it work on both PC and XBOX ?

Yes the HD DVD drive works with PC/Mac afaik, but pls confirm from other sources too.

thrash_metal said:
He also said that the BL drive can not be region free as it region locked permanantly ...sad point !

I think games are region free but the movie disks are not in the case of PS3.
 
tarey_g said:
Despite of the fact that you have compated a sh1tty game for both consoles , other thing you have done is comparing them in wrong way. The pics you have are from gamespots this article :

*www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/index.html

Here comparison of other games is also given, just see the COD3 and Madden comparision. Go see them and dont just post half truth.







@GX , blu ray is a plus for sony and so is the cell procesor . But yes RSX is no match for Xenon.
The lower common denominator if PS3 SKU's is better than 360 . We wont see a game ever on HD-DVD when needed, nither lower end 360 has a HDD. Also Blu ray is currently Ahead of HD DVD in race , but we have to see what future holds.

and btw gx, quake wars is coming on PS3 too.


But my current experience with both the consoles on a HI def display was totally dissapointing, I played Lost planet on 360 and resistance on PS3 and both the games just look ok, as a PC gamer i have seen better things . I also played Project gotham Racing on 360 and the game looks so crap that if it was a PC game i would reject it in a minute. Besides all this dissapointing things the controls on a gamepad suck when you are playing a shooter , the Lost planet AI was made so dumb on purpose and the enemy was so slow to give time for the gamer to shoot them with the crappy anolog controller.

Never knew consoles are so sh1t.

PC Rules. it has Crysis and gears too.

Hmmmmmmmmm...... but have u notice i already mentioned that "I don't like to compare both console in this way, it is just for them who believe that PS3 graphix is not better than Xbox or Xbox produce better graphix than PS3. And this is not first time..... these things I already mentioned twice in earlier posts"

Now about the graphix ---> See game developing is not easy part, it is engineering stuff. We alredy seen that some games looks much better on PS3 while some looks better on Xbox360..... But have u ever think why????

Look.....
According to game developers, the PlayStation 3 platform, even in comparison to the Xbox 360, is technologically too complicated to make it easy to develop games, especially by second-tier developers.

The second-tier developers, including those in Taiwan, do not have the financial or technological capabilities that international developers do and therefore cannot pass the technological barriers that the PS3 platform imposes.

This fact can partly account for the limited amount of PS3-specific games.

The developers also indicated that the Xbox 360 platform much was easier to produce games for.

The developers also made some interesting points. Although the PS3 might have stronger hardware functionality than the Xbox 360 many users do not see better video quality while playing the same game on both systems. A reason for this phenomenon is possibly that game developers are more willing to invest in optimized performance for the Xbox 360 simply because those games are currently more profitable.

*www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/9181.cfm
 

BULLZI

Ambassador of Buzz
I am planning to buy a PS3. Now which one 40GB or 60 GB?
And also is it safe to buy from gadgetguru.in?
I found there PS3 60 GB @ 30 K all inclusive.
 

keith_j_snyder2

Rising ApocalypsE
Technically too , the Xbox 360 GPU is better than the PS3's .

Actually NO!
The X360 has a 512 MB DDR3 700 MHz or somewhat like that
but the PS3 has got 256 MB XDR RAM which has more bandwidth over DDR3.
Like somewhat like 2 GHz, not sure about that!

Also X-360 has a shared graphics memory!

Its like choosing a GDDR2 memory over GDDR3!

Besides the X360 can perform 1 Tera Flops of computing whereas PS3 can handle over 2 Teraflops, but that because of its entire hardware!
 
Top Bottom