karnivore
in your face..
Thanks for reminding me of what to do and what not to. 911 myths were dealt with in the original Zeitgeist. If you had taken your tin foil off, for a sec, u would have noticed that I have provided links for debunking both the crapiolas.Too bad Zeitgeist: Addendum has nothing to do with 911 eh? If it did, then your post would be relevant. Try watching the movie instead of making assumptions and posting based on those false assumptions.[/font]karnivore said:OK.....time to DEBUNK.
ConspiracyScience - probably the best debunking on the net
WebSkeptic
(A word of caution though. The movie has been debunked from both sides of the divide. The Christians and the skeptics. So...take your pick)
One can join in the discussions at:
JREF
RichardDawkins.net
JREF-Addendum
RichardDawkins.net-Addendum
There are plenty of debunking vids on YouTube and Google video. Not all are good, but some are...
You can do your own research as well.
For 911 :
*www.debunk911myths.org
*www.911myths.com
*www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html
US Federal Reserve:
*www.federalreserveeducation.o.../tour/tour.htm
I admit though, that I should have posted debunking links in respective threads, specially when a separate thread exists. But really who cares. Just look at the thread itself. In spite of providing means to verify the claims made by the makers, people continue to download and be in awe.
As Barnum said, "A sucker is born every minute", and they continue to be suckers, because thats what they choose to be. Anyway....
Mea Culpa.
Last edited: