D
dhruv_arora
Guest
Source : *infunity.info/component/content/article/2-all/1-wikipedia-to-trust-or-not-to.html
When Wikipedia started gaining in popularity, so did its diversion from actual content. Its Wiki style management means user can edit its content; this remains to be Wikipedia biggest boon and bane. Among the anonymous edits to Wikipedia, it was discovered that Republicans changed the "occupation of Iraq" to "Iraq's liberation". While this might not affect you, other information might: Information you use in your presentations, assignments, claims, etc might cause a hint of bother.
So that that leaves one in two minds about Wikipedia, to trust or not to trust.
My Verdict: Mostly changes on Wikipedia are politically motivated, so don't trust articles that can be politically linked. For homework and assignments one can use Wikipedia, especially for technical topics like science and technolgy. And lastly, don't ever use information from articles that state citation needed.
In conclusion,I trust Wikipedia[Citation needed]
When Wikipedia started gaining in popularity, so did its diversion from actual content. Its Wiki style management means user can edit its content; this remains to be Wikipedia biggest boon and bane. Among the anonymous edits to Wikipedia, it was discovered that Republicans changed the "occupation of Iraq" to "Iraq's liberation". While this might not affect you, other information might: Information you use in your presentations, assignments, claims, etc might cause a hint of bother.
So that that leaves one in two minds about Wikipedia, to trust or not to trust.
My Verdict: Mostly changes on Wikipedia are politically motivated, so don't trust articles that can be politically linked. For homework and assignments one can use Wikipedia, especially for technical topics like science and technolgy. And lastly, don't ever use information from articles that state citation needed.
In conclusion,I trust Wikipedia[Citation needed]