^^CPU wise 6595 beats snapdragon 800 hands down now if the gpu is taken into context then the existing 6200 is near the level of Adreno 320 if not more and that too on 8135 dual core SOC . so, you can expect it to perform better on a much more efficient SOC like 6595.
And they will have to keep the prices down because of competition ...
- - - Updated - - -
and yeah once android one is launched i know that google will provide a rock stable OS to micromax which they will customize easily for their top segment phones.
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] Have you ever personally used or seen a Mi3?
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] Have you ever personally used or seen a Mi3?
Mt6595 does not have mali 450 and that is a good thing as it is weaker than Power vr 600 series which is there in Mt6595
anyways both power vr 6200 ( 6595 ) and Mali t760 MP4 are much weaker than Adreno 330
in cpu and antutu benchmarks though it can give tough competition to xiaomi mi3 .. antutu score will be around 45000 for mt 6595
but that is just a number though
but i doubt it mmx will price it at 14k , they have been pricing every high end mediatek chip phone they launch at around 20k i don't see that changing as they spend a lot on advertising , offline sales etc and xiaomi is not there in offline
Mali T760MP4 weaker than a Adreno 330 ?.....WHAT ?
Rockchip RK3288 with Mali-T760 GPU shows up on GFX Benchmark | ARCTABLET NEWS
According to the above article Mali T760 clearly beats the Ad 330 in high level tests but suffers in low level tests due to the weak CPU in the chip
All mediatek octa core setups have cortex A7 core's, the only octa core setup which beats a SD801..let alone a SD800 in CPU and browser benchmarks, is the Samsung Exynos 5422(1.9 Ghz Cortex A15+ 1.7 Ghz Cortex A7)
If Mediatek manages to pair the T760 with such a setup, they will get their selves a chip which will leave the SD 801/800 in the dust. One such chip is the MT6752 and if Micromax manages to get that inside an "Anroid One" phone, they will have themselves a winner.
Cheers!
AbhMkh
So, lets see how the Xiaomi compares with a future indian brand with a 6595Tlol power vr 6200 and is much weaker bro
see here..
*gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx30&os=Android&api=gl&D=MediaTek+MT6595&testgroup=overall
as per this leaked benchmark in manhatan test , adreno 330 is aprox 70-100 % faster than 6595 which is quite a big difference..
Regarding CPU we will have to wait for a cpu intensive benchmark before making any judgement.. antutu scores will obviously be higher because of higher no of cores
even then i can bet that the difference won't be that high ...so beating Sd 800 will still be far away but i agree chip is very cool but i don't think any brand other than Xiaomi will bring that chip for under 15k at launch... so xiaomi will remain ahead because of its pricing factor + gpu though
So, lets see how the Xiaomi compares with a future indian brand with a 6595T
a) Undoubtedly better GPU so you can play a bit more games. (Xi:1 MM:0)
b) Weaker CPU with lesser no of cores and with a 6595T it will be ever faster with "A True Octa Core(little Big Architecture)" so a lot better Multitasking and App navigation.(Xi:1 MM:1)
c) Android One vs MIUI - A rock Solid OS Supported by Google vs a ROM which needs a weekly update to patch bugs and that too of Huge in size 200-300Mbs(Xi:1 MM:2)
d)ASS of every Indian brand is more of less pathetic so zero points but even Xiaomi has very less service center except few elite cities and not a single center in more than half states of country so, it's virtually non existent .Moreover [MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] was saying that a cneter in Mumbai refused to even accept the Brands name . so a zero point here also (Xi:1 MM:2)
You can add few points of your own if you deem fit and expand the list but as of now future MM is leading .
Good luck
lol bro read the article again....
i'll post the highlights ...
T rex offscreen
Mali T760 MP4 - 21.9 fps
SD 800 - 28.3 Fps
Manhattan offscreen
Malt t760Mp4 - 9.6 FPS
SD 800 - 11.3 FPS
I really don't understand how you came to that conclusion when the scores are exactly opposite of what you are saying...
Are you comparing onscreen benchmarks Lol bro.. that rk3288 chip is running on 1280 x 800 while Sd 800 on 1920 x1080 ofcourse bench will be lower on SD800 due to high resolution
Bro although Mt6752 is great but it is nothing special actually .. it is 8 x cortex A53 .. it is an upgrade to Mt6592 chip
Cortex A53 is just an upgraded cortex A7 ..
the best chip so far from mediatek is 6595 itself with 4 x cortex A17 + 4 x cortex A7 in CPU
P.s - Malit760 is a monster GPU if used in 16 core configuration .. but all these vendors are using only 4 core Configuration .. at 16 cores it could easily beat Adreno 430 / Tegra k1 but i don't think thermals would allow that in a smartphone .. maybe they can come up with 8 core config .. i would prefer a quad core cortex A17 + 8 core Mali t760
i believe 8 Cores are enough to take on an Adreno 330 with Peak performance around 160GlopsYou are right, I forgot to take the resolution into account while checking the on screen numbers.
However, when we are talking about the Adreno 330 . We must take into account the version of the GPU
We have the SD800 in which the ad330 is running at 450mhz whereas in the 801ab/ac its running at an even higher clock speed.
The LG G2 which runs on the SD 800 scores 22/23 FPS in the onscreen/off screen TREX test.
Now the MALI T628MP6 inside the Exynos 5422 scores 27/27 whereas the HTC one m8 which has the sd801ac scores 27/28.
Going by the above numbers it is hard to believe that it will require a 16 core T760 to beat the adreno 330(the highest clocked version).
So, lets see how the Xiaomi compares with a future indian brand with a 6595T
a) Undoubtedly better GPU so you can play a bit more games. (Xi:1 MM:0)
b) Weaker CPU with lesser no of cores and with a 6595T it will be ever faster with "A True Octa Core(little Big Architecture)" so a lot better Multitasking and App navigation.(Xi:1 MM:1)
c) Android One vs MIUI - A rock Solid OS Supported by Google vs a ROM which needs a weekly update to patch bugs and that too of Huge in size 200-300Mbs(Xi:1 MM:2)
d)ASS of every Indian brand is more of less pathetic so zero points but even Xiaomi has very less service center except few elite cities and not a single center in more than half states of country so, it's virtually non existent .Moreover [MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] was saying that a cneter in Mumbai refused to even accept the Brands name . so a zero point here also (Xi:1 MM:2)
You can add few points of your own if you deem fit and expand the list but as of now future MM is leading .
Good luck
You are right, I forgot to take the resolution into account while checking the on screen numbers.
However, when we are talking about the Adreno 330 . We must take into account the version of the GPU
We have the SD800 in which the ad330 is running at 450mhz whereas in the 801ab/ac its running at an even higher clock speed.
The LG G2 which runs on the SD 800 scores 22/23 FPS in the onscreen/off screen TREX test.
Now the MALI T628MP6 inside the Exynos 5422 scores 27/27 whereas the HTC one m8 which has the sd801ac scores 27/28.
Going by the above numbers it is hard to believe that it will require a 16 core T760 to beat the adreno 330(the highest clocked version).
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] Please don't mind me buddy but it looks like you have opened a campaign against Xiaomi
[MENTION=145143]SaiyanGoku[/MENTION] looks like you have been paid a huge amount by Xiaomi to suugest it in every thread
Just looks at 2 contrasts
^^ Oh Yeah CM is the closest you will get the the True android experience. so, what OPO has done that it has combined the cutting edge Hardware with the very best software and CM also has a guarantee of Updates for many years to come(Heck i am running CM9.0 on Galaxy ACE)
- - - Updated - - -
i believe 8 Cores are enough to take on an Adreno 330 with Peak performance around 160Glops
- - - Updated - - -
[MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION] Please don't mind me buddy but it looks like you have opened a campaign against Xiaomi
[MENTION=145143]SaiyanGoku[/MENTION] looks like you have been paid a huge amount by Xiaomi to suugest it in every thread
Just looks at 2 contrasts
+1 ^^Having used and as an owner ofmi3 dare I say it's one of the best phones I have come across.. To generalise and dismiss these as "Chinese" phones would be an understatement
Companies like Xiaomi, Oneplus, OPPO, ZTE, Huawei etc are really upping their game and producing world class phones and if people are stuck in the past it's their loss..
But to pass on your misconception as truth to others is a bit naive and a bit desperate
Grow up kid, the world is changing @kkn13
lol no i hate it when misinformation is spread,i hate all chinese brands equally
ive seen my friends suffer in this aspect and i myself have had issues with such products in the past so i like to open peoples eyes to the reality of such brands
Having used and as an owner ofmi3 dare I say it's one of the best phones I have come across.. To generalise and dismiss these as "Chinese" phones would be an understatement
Companies like Xiaomi, Oneplus, OPPO, ZTE, Huawei etc are really upping their game and producing world class phones and if people are stuck in the past it's their loss..
But to pass on your misconception as truth to others is a bit naive and a bit desperate
Grow up kid, the world is changing [MENTION=184724]kkn13[/MENTION]
@kkn But in other thread you said you haven't used phone below 20k well i guess that would be re branded Chinese one. All Indian brands have pathetic service But i must say within 10k Xolo phones are much better than samshit even Sony.
Criteria for people differs some buy just to show off,Some need better specification,Some needs large screen even with pathetic screen resolution etc etc.
Myself is a fan of VFM phones I will not buy a phone more than 15k ever.They just gets outdated very fast.