avichandana20000
Cyborg Agent
^^ solution already given by me . HEHE.
Nope, it's perfectly fine. It will incur no damage until the parts themselves melt from the heat.Of course, putting a mobo in sun is not advised for long, but even 5 min will do or until you see them leaving your PC. Same applies to other parts.
I ended up reading the entire wiki article on Ant thanks to OP.![]()
Thanks,But now i get a doubt. Can i clean my keyboard,speakers,woofer using USB vaccum?
But now i get a doubt. Can i clean my keyboard,speakers,woofer using USB vaccum?
Guys, you are talking against using vacuum cleaner in a PC because it might induce static charge. Do you realise, that when you spray compressed air on PC parts, it creates friction and then induces charge on it? Have anyone ever thought of this? I personally think Vacuum will be more efficient in cleaning PC parts than blowing compressed air. But again, it's a personal opinion, let's see what you guys have to say about this. Think scientific guys, think physics!
Hi friends!
In my System Unit, There is full of ants. I don't know how to solve this problem. Everyday i have to open my System Unit and ONLY can see the ants and what they're doing. I'm really worried, because my whole system is becoming the home of ants. My keyboard also affected. Everyday i have to disconnect the keyboard and kill them. My modem and everything is affected. I don't know what to do. They also getting into my hdd. Roaming around my motherboard.Please help me.
P.S: I work 18 hours/day on my pc. i dont know how these ants get into my keyboard even if it is in use.Because of this i ordered a vacuum cleaner on ebay. But not yet received.
Guys, you are talking against using vacuum cleaner in a PC because it might induce static charge. Do you realise, that when you spray compressed air on PC parts, it creates friction and then induces charge on it? Have anyone ever thought of this? I personally think Vacuum will be more efficient in cleaning PC parts than blowing compressed air. But again, it's a personal opinion, let's see what you guys have to say about this. Think scientific guys, think physics!
Guys, you are talking against using vacuum cleaner in a PC because it might induce static charge. Do you realise, that when you spray compressed air on PC parts, it creates friction and then induces charge on it? Have anyone ever thought of this? I personally think Vacuum will be more efficient in cleaning PC parts than blowing compressed air. But again, it's a personal opinion, let's see what you guys have to say about this. Think scientific guys, think physics!
Static electricity can never be avoided whenever there is moving dust/particles (which is also the case with chassis fans) unless the metal is grounded, which is not the case since motherboards are mounted on pegs. Personally, static has never been a problem to me. Its not the static that is harmful, but the magnitude of the accommodated charge.![]()
Well "scientifically" thinking wouldn't friction be caused in either of the case? I think if spraying air on PC parts can create charge then air getting sucked by any vacuum would also create static. Just the method change. End effect would be the same.
I was never good at physics but thinking rationally leads me to this conclusion.
Because of this i ordered a vacuum cleaner on ebay. But not yet received.
Well, as per me, when you use vaccum the air is pulled thus creating friction with the parts, thus imparting static charge.. But as nBaztec said, charge doesn't matter, the magnitude does.
As the distance between components is really less, the less deposited charge can also flow through the air to another component..
Thus neither air nor vaccum is recommended.
But if we complete the circuit time to time and ground the static charge, it must do.. Touching the ATX Connector while putting batefoot on the ground can be done..
Well "scientifically" thinking wouldn't friction be caused in either of the case? I think if spraying air on PC parts can create charge then air getting sucked by any vacuum would also create static. Just the method change. End effect would be the same.
I was never good at physics but thinking rationally leads me to this conclusion.
I recommend you not go ape-sh!t on koolant by debating on dielectrics, electron flow, metallic shields and, but not limited to, the Tesla sphere.Charge just can't "flow" through air, if it does inside your cabinet, you will see lightning bolts. Air is an insulator, charge needs a certain minimum magnitude to break the insulation of air and flow. That's why you sometimes see sparking in switches which you rapidly turn off. Think you're good at physics? Physics makes us think again.
That is certainly debatable. While it might be true that vacuum will suck air unidirectionally, but the static charge on the mouth of it will be much, if not greater, owing to the material and high friction caused by the sucking action.I know that even vacuum was going to induce charge, but apparantely, of much lower magnitude than blowing air. \
Charge just can't "flow" through air, if it does inside your cabinet, you will see lightning bolts. Air is an insulator, charge needs a certain minimum magnitude to break the insulation of air and flow. That's why you sometimes see sparking in switches which you rapidly turn off. Think you're good at physics? Physics makes us think again.
I know that even vacuum was going to induce charge, but apparantely, of much lower magnitude than blowing air. \