I will call it just another fps with over hyped graphics.Game demo is short and gameplay is just above average.xbonez said:anyone played demo of bioshock yet?? howz it.
i'm waiting for my broadband plan to get upgraded to 2mbps (hopwefully in a couple of days), then i'll play the full version. muahahaha
Look here,u'll find the release date of Gears of War(Release Date Nov 6 2007)and many more upcoming titles here-entrana said:so, what now?
ya one mo thing release date of gow please
I have the full version of the game.And to be true 2k games showed some fake videos of the in game graphics.The gameplay however is very good.For example u can electrocute an enemy when he/she is in water,send bees flying towards enemies,u can hijack a bot and it'll fight for u,u can enrage an enemy to attack whatever comes infront and even more.I wouldn't give it a good point on graphics as the polygon count has been decreased drastically to improve performance.I am currently in the 3rd stage.xbonez said:anyone played demo of bioshock yet?? howz it.
i'm waiting for my broadband plan to get upgraded to 2mbps (hopwefully in a couple of days), then i'll play the full version. muahahaha
No,the game comes default with low polygons.If u have played the demo then when the first time u see the splicer with the sickle u know when u look at the sickle that the polygon count is low(its not even close to being round).And yes,it was noted with everything set to high at 1600*1200.aravind_n20 said:@Harvik780
dat means u had to reduce the quality drastically to get running on ur 8800?
Then hope how it wud be on my 7600Gt
No turning it off should give a performance hit.Force global lightning forces global static lightning.allwyndlima said:^I heard that the game also takes a performance hit by tuning on this option.
I have the steam version.Downloaded via steam.I don't think Bioshock DVD is available in India.allwyndlima said:Oh I think you misunderstood me.I meant it would take a toll on the performance. Anways did you get the collector's edition or the regular copy?
Bioshock though will run fine on ur system at 1024*768 resolution with everything set to high but the textures might take longer to load due to which u might see blank textures at some areas of the game(this was also a problem with Gears of war for the XBOX 360).This mainly due to athlon 64 3200+ being a single core processor.xbonez said:with my amd athlon 64 3200+, 2gb transcend 400mhz ram in dual channel and ati x1600pro, i'm expecting to be playing it at the lowest gfx levels. so i hopt the gameplay makes up for the low gfx levels.
which would u reccomend : Bioshock or STALKER
Arrree static lightning is not dynamic that means it uses less power of the video card so Forcing global lightning should increase performance.allwyndlima said:Oh I think you misunderstood me.I meant it would take a toll on the performance. Anways did you get the collector's edition or the regular copy?
Well,games do not pass out getting good ratings under me.However if u get a chance,do play bioshock,its worth playing.What bioshock really misses out is in its promise for excellent graphics but what it makes the missing feature fulfilled with is its story line and action and the mean yes and no decision,weather u'll harvest the little sister or rescue her(the story ending depends on it,i think).Coming to the graphics front,what i saw in the uploaded movies was water animation and fluid physics was top notch but when i played it i realized that it wasn't up to the mark.entrana said:harvy how wud u rate bioshock