NIGHTMARE said:Rigorously tested using 174,770 virus samples, and the settings of each application were tweaked to ensure that they all caught maximum number of viruses
This is the list of the top 20 antivirus applications
01. Kaspersky version 7.0.0.43 beta - 99.23%
02. Kaspersky version 6.0.2.614 - 99.13%
03. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.308 - 99.13%
04. ZoneAlarm with KAV Antivirus version 7.0.337.000 - 99.13%
05. F-Secure 2007 version 7.01.128 - 98.56%
06. BitDefender Professional version 10 - 97.70%
07. BullGuard version 7.0.0.23 - 96.59%
08. Ashampoo version 1.30 - 95.80%
09. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 94.43%
10. Nod32 version 2.70.32 - 94.00%
11. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 93.27%
12. Avast Professional version 4.7.986 - 92.82%
13. AVG Anti-Malware version 7.5.465 - 92.14%
14. F-Prot version 6.0.6.4 - 91.35%
15. McAfee Enterprise version 8.5.0i+AntiSpyware module - 90.65%
16. Panda 2007 version 2.01.00 - 90.06%
17. Norman version 5.90.37 - 88.47%
18. ArcaVir 2007 - 88.24%
19. McAfee version 11.0.213 - 86.13%
20. Norton Professional 2007 - 86.08%
Source
Shashwat Pant said:Err. They should have kept system too in mind See Kapersky Nortun father in hogging memory I would never purchase that even if I would have 4 gigs of Ram Plz give some air they are too hoging Avast and Actve Virus shields are ok for home user they must have taken bribe
hcp006sl said:Source
- Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0
- Norton AntiVirus 2007
- BitDefender Antivirus v10
- Eset NOD32
- Panda Antivirus 2007
- Avast Antivirus Professional
- AVG 7.5 Anti-Virus Professional
- Trend Micro AntiVirus plus AntiSpyware 2007
mad1231moody said:I am using Kaspersky antivirus for long and no way it is a resource hogger. It is the best coupled with zonealarm.