Tell me how do I remove the C drive from "Computer" in Vista and "My Computer" in XP. I am really curious.iMav said:now why wud un-install something i spent 1 week trying to install ... besides its just another flaw if u wanna remove icons from desktop u have to un mount thedrive in case of ntfs and incase of a hfs+ or fat32 u cant
stop actingdumb ... im talking about desktop ... i got 2 hdds an d a total of 7 drives ... 7 drives are on my desktop and i cant remove them from the desktoparyayush said:Tell me how do I remove the C drive from "Computer" in Vista and "My Computer" in XP. I am really curious.
Similarly, there are free third party utilities and built-in terminal commands to hide the drives on Mac OS X.gx_saurav said:There is a simple way & a 3rd party way.
Simple way for Windows XP = Use Windows XP Powertoys & hide the drive to show in "My Computer" or use the inbuilt group policy editor.
For Windows Vista = Again, Tweak Vista or Tune up or GPedit....what ever pleases you.
"My Computer"/"Computer" on Windows = "Desktop" on unix based operating systems.iMav said:stop actingdumb ... im talking about desktop ...
aryayush said:Similarly, there are free third party utilities and built-in terminal commands to hide the drives on Mac OS X.
"My Computer"/"Computer" on Windows = "Desktop" on unix based operating systems.
arya said:@Kenshin, thanks! Simply telling me there is a way to do it would have sufficed though because I do not actually use Windows and have certainly never wanted to do something as dumb as (at least I find it pretty dumb) hide my drives. Thanks anyway.![]()
I am not trying to say anything. You and iMav have this dirty habit of not being able to do something on Mac OS X and then saying that "its just another flaw if u wanna remove icons from desktop u have to un mount thedrive in case of ntfs and incase of a hfs+ or fat32 u cant". So I showed you that no OS will make it very easy to hide entire drives. And if some OS does, then the OS is stupid. So quit the scathing remarks and leave this thread to Mac users, which both of you are not.gx_saurav said:Ya, we know. So? What are you trying to say here?
Are you completely mental or what! No, wait. I know the answer to that.gx_saurav said:Another comment given by ignorence. If we follow what you say then Windows Desktop is easier to manager & much cleaner to show the wallpapser then Mac.
Computer = A unified place for all your "Hard Disk Drives" & "Removable Drives".
Desktop (in Windows) = A place to see the wallpaper & the recycle bin (which can be removed)
He is right. Here is an actual quote from a user on the AppleInsider forum:nepcker said:Mac's Value for money:
Macs have great value for money. Even very old macs (as old as 10 years old, I guess) perfectly run Mac OS X Tiger and they will most probably run Leopard.
That's a great value for money.
SourceI don't so much need the 'puter now, would like it now, but I am prepared to wait for C2D and Leopard if indeed they are ever going to happen in the Mini or a.n.other replacement. My old G3PB is still ticking over nicely, albeit woefully underpowered for todays video files amongst other compromises. I've just ordered a Combo drive to replace a broken DVD ROM drive in that so there's a little life in the old dog yet.
Hmm....reported #19292929292th time.aryayush said:Are you completely mental or what! No, wait. I know the answer to that.
Well, Windows users like to keep our computer organised & uncluttered, that includes the desktopThe desktop is "A place to see the wallpaper"!?! WOW! That huge big space is being put to good use, I must say. By that theory, Windows should not even allow you to place icons on it. Why, just see the wallpaper. Nokia must be stupid to add the 'Active Standby' feature - after all, it hides the all important wallpaper.![]()
Again, since you do not have anything proper to say, you are deviating the thread.I said this before and I am saying it again - you are not invited here. This thread is for Mac users. Take your junk to that Fight Club thread and please, please do not dirty this thread. I do not know of any politer way to request.
I guess you forgot the highlight the whole line.don't so much need the 'puter now, would like it now, but I am prepared to wait for C2D and Leopard if indeed they are ever going to happen in the Mini or a.n.other replacement. My old G3PB is still ticking over nicely, albeit woefully underpowered for todays video files amongst other compromises. I've just ordered a Combo drive to replace a broken DVD ROM drive in that so there's a little life in the old dog yet.
Hey nepcker, I m still looking to find out how to set icon spacing in finder?I've read several such statements but luckily I'd read nepcker's post today and ran across this post today itself.
No, I did not. I purposely quoted the whole paragraph because I never intend to lie. Yes, his notebook is now showing its age but it is still not completely useless. This notebook was bought in April, 1998 or before that. I would assume a little before because Apple discontinued it in April, 1998 so it is not necessary that he bought it in the last month itself. In any case, he has been using it for nine years already. And he is running Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" on it now. Most probably, it will also run Leopard because unlike Windows, Mac OS X runs better on the same configuration with each iteration.gx_saurav said:I guess you forgot the highlight the whole line.
No, I don't. He simply cannot run Vista on that machine. Maybe he can install it (and I doubt even that is possible) but he cannot use it. I had trouble using it on my P4 machine with Aero turned on. (That green thing in the address bar took ages to finish.)gx_saurav said:My friends pentium 3 1 GHz with 512 MB SD RAM is also working fine since the Year 2000, it is running Windows XP SP2 & does the work properly, though it is slow now due to 1 GHz CPU.
Umm...see any connection arya?
aryayush said:No, I did not. I purposely quoted the whole paragraph because I never intend to lie. Yes, his notebook is now showing its age but it is still not completely useless. This notebook was bought in April, 1998 or before that. I would assume a little before because Apple discontinued it in April, 1998 so it is not necessary that he bought it in the last month itself. In any case, he has been using it for nine years already. And he is running Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" on it now. Most probably, it will also run Leopard because unlike Windows, Mac OS X runs better on the same configuration with each iteration.
He simply cannot run Vista on that machine. Maybe he can install it (and I doubt even that is possible) but he cannot use it. I had trouble using it on my P4 machine with Aero turned on. (That green thing in the address bar took ages to finish.)
And in any case, this thread is not about Windows. You have been challenging that Macs are not value for money because they do not last long. I just gave you some proof of the contrary. Accept it and move on. Nothing more; nothing less.
Ya, i just read again, he proved again & again why they are not VFMaryayush said:LOL! He gave the example of a Mac Mini, took the older model, increased the price and then said he could build a similar PC four times cheaper. I challenged him. Like Hell he did. And of course, the specs of the Mini were higher than what he said and the price was lower. He sure proved how VFM they are!![]()