mail2and
Walking, since 2004.
Aberforth said:UK has some of the best universities in the world like UoL, Leeds, Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburg, Glasgow and other 5 or 4 1/2 star rated ones and they are better than Indian ones several times over for their focus on research, industry collaboration, teaching environment and best of all - opportunities. (
Actually, in the case of B-schools, Indian schools are right up there with the best. I would take world rankings with a grain of salt. They have indicators like diversity of students, alumni effectiveness, work experience etc.
I have admits from Cranfield, Cass, Lancaster and Edinburgh for MSc Finance. According to The Economist, Cranfield is the 19th best B-school in the world, with the rest of the three being in the top 50.
However, the director of MSc programs at a top UK univ himself agreed that the grads from IIMs are much better than that of any UK business school, with the exception of London Business School. Oxford(Said), Cambridge(Judge) and Cranfield might have fancy names, but their MBA grads are not better than those from the IIMs.
As for opportunities, the top 20 schools here get 100% placement(almost). In the UK, getting a job after MBA with less work experience is almost next to impossible.
Research wise the UK univs are better, as they charge a huge amount as fees. They do get grants from the government, but they charge huge amounts from international students to make up a large part of their requirements.
But, all in all, I would settle for a top 10 Indian b-school admit than say Cranfield, Cass or even LSE.