- Status
The thing you are refering are not called softwares. They are compiler's.
Well......for your query. Dev C++
Well......for your query. Dev C++
TheHumanBot
Padawan
Intel has released some c++ compilers.
devgujar
Broken In
cooldev007
Broken In
You Can Also Use The Turbo C++ Compiler. You Can Download it from here.
Turbocpp.exe
*www.box.net/shared/tmgrfue1sf
Turbocpp.exe
*www.box.net/shared/tmgrfue1sf
◕B.MANjESH09◕
Right off the assembly line
Turbo C.....one of the best compilers.
infra_red_dude
Wire muncher!
+1
That's a nice option too.
Personally, if you are just starting to learn C/C++ I would recommend the following:
1) Windows platform: Visual C++ Express Edition (2008)
2) Portable (Windows/UNIX): Eclipse or Dev C++ and GCC backend
Both VS and Eclipse are very mature IDE and would help you learn debugging which is a very essential aspect of programming. While GCC is more standards compliant (C99), Visual C++ is still getting there. But at this point, you don't care much about portability (if your code is very complex with millions of lines of code and you need to ensure that it runs fine on Windows as well as UNIX).
It is not free. You need to have a license for that.
OMFG!! I don't believe people still use and recommend this ancient, obsolete, dead compiler/IDE! My advice to everybody - if you are planning to use Turbo C/C++ then stay away! If you are already using it, stop!!!! Change your compiler! The company which made these compilers [Borland] sold it off like 15 years ago to another company.
This compiler has not been updated since, I guess, 1996!!!! Please, stop using this compiler and stop recommending it to people. Use a more standard and mature compiler like GCC (with Dev C++ IDE etc.) or MS Visual Studio or if you have lots of money or can get an academic license Intel's C++ compiler is the best on Intel hardware.
[Borland - the developer of Turbo C/C++ compiler - sold the whole compiler division to some other company and that came out with a C/C++ compiler called, I think, Rad C++ or something. I've never used it, nor seen anyone use it; so can't recommend it].
I agree with you on that, though. It's a good book for beginners, though, most of the stuff in it is outdated [and specific to Turbo C/C++] and is not C99 standard compliant.
infra_red_dude
Wire muncher!
No No No.. please. No Turbo C/C++! Sure, I too was a fan of it 10 years ago, but not today!
My bad, I should've mentioned 2010. This version is almost C99 compliant. Thank you for correcting
CA50
Cyborg Agent
Hmmmm.... actually you are right after laying my hands on DevC++
, i don`t look backward toward Turbos
cooldip10
In the zone
For starters, Turbo C++ is good option.
But to be a good C programmer, you need to shift to GCC. Turbo has become outdated for quite sometime.
But I would like to mention one thing, after learning C, you will have to move on to C++ as most common languages are Object Oriented. Google it you will get more info.
On windows platform: I would suggest Dev C++/Codeblocks.. Then you can move to Visual Studio (But that is 6-8 months after you start).
But to be a good C programmer, you need to shift to GCC. Turbo has become outdated for quite sometime.
But I would like to mention one thing, after learning C, you will have to move on to C++ as most common languages are Object Oriented. Google it you will get more info.
On windows platform: I would suggest Dev C++/Codeblocks.. Then you can move to Visual Studio (But that is 6-8 months after you start).
- Status