OK, lemme tell u... I'm finicky about these things and 've gone thru all these reviews and more for the last few months.
To be precise, these are the sites I got thru...
Digital Camera Resource, DPhotoJournal, DCViews, Digital Photography Blog, Digital Camera - 101 Reviews, Megapixel, The Imaging Resource, DPReview, Steve's Digicams... pretty impressive list; some of them u've already mentioned.
This is when the confusion started. Both seem to be too good. Canon has a swivelling 2.5" LCD (which helps take special shots at different angles) with 6 megapix cam while Sony has a 3" LCD with 7 megapix cam. Both are reputed prosumer models with manual controls. Both have image stabilization and both perform well in stabilization and quality of pic(from the reviews). Both are almost similar in bulkiness. Good zoom of 12x for both.
Too much of a similarity with all the things I need in a good camera.
Where each surpasses the other are...
If Canon has a swivelling LCD with lesser purple fringing and lower cost; Sony has 7 megapix, a beautiful 3.0" LCD & uses only 2 NiMH rechargeable AA batteries (lot cheaper than the Lithium batteries in the other models, and, in emergencies, I can put any off-the-shelf alkalines instead of the original ones)
So it comes back to the first question I asked previously.... down to the real users of the cameras, which one is better in quality... lesser dust, better low-light photography,better motion capuring and better zoom-end picture quality (as I asked before)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm also at a contradiction with the price here...
I feel 26K is one price range and 30K another. So in the 26k range falls Canon S3 IS and Nikon Coolpix S10. Sony H5 comes in the 30k bracket.
So if I come down on price & buy the 26k Canon, why not go for a smaller size, stylish, swivelling LCD Nikon S10!!! (size does matter too)