Tapomay
Lazy fat guy..
I think they should definitely pay heed on the page where the pole results are published every month now; month after month their occur worse printing mistakes and they don't pay attention or publish any corrigendum. Although I am not very much interested in the poll results but it's very much annoying to me to found this in a mag like Digit.
And for the mobile review this month - all you know how much that sucks. On page 60 the Intex infi's negetive point is 'Expensive' and on next page it's quoted 'very affordable' . They tested only some boring (not so popular) models this time and I can understand many news-stand buyers bought the mag this month only for the mobile review. In future they will think twice before buying the mag.
And what's about Digit Patron? Is '14th Feb 2007' yet to come or they do not need our patronage anymore ? Anyway I am not bothered.
And for the mobile review this month - all you know how much that sucks. On page 60 the Intex infi's negetive point is 'Expensive' and on next page it's quoted 'very affordable' . They tested only some boring (not so popular) models this time and I can understand many news-stand buyers bought the mag this month only for the mobile review. In future they will think twice before buying the mag.
And what's about Digit Patron? Is '14th Feb 2007' yet to come or they do not need our patronage anymore ? Anyway I am not bothered.