Quite funnily - many desis around the world are not able to see the videos on YouTube because BCCI has made it for Indians only. They want it to be available only for people living in India.ESPN & Star sucks bigtime. Poor quality uploads of events and Google sucks even more to block videos so people can't see videos from their own country. Thomas said world is flat? Its the other way - we live in a managed social apartheid. fu*k google!
many desis around the world are unable to see videos on google. they are blocked. what google is scared of?
And the problem of quality of videos on google was same during last IPL season. ALL of IPL videos on Google were in bad shape and quality during last season. Lalit modi had given all internet video publishing rights for IPL to Google(utube) and they screwed it bigtime. I doubt they will do this to some american events.
What is wrong with this google? Its run by some korean if I am not wrong?
Well superb pics, thanks guys.
Also, it must be noted that Indian news channels media has BOYCOTTED the Worldcup final match. ICC denied two news channels permission to enter the venue because of some their own allegations that these channels flouted their rules(which don't apply under American territory but work nicely on weak countries). So, all decided not to enter venue to cover from inside stadium.
Attitude of goras will never change. IPL was need of time.
If this is true, then it is disgraceful.There are reports that ICC blocked Indian freelance photographers from covering the final match and kept them out of it.
My source is not wrong. BCCI got into a deal with ESPNStar for providing an online stream and YouTube updates for Indian people. And the match stream was butterly smooth.Its not the BCCI who control rights over WC videos. It's the ICC who makes decisions. Your source is wrong.
Nothing related to the attitude of Goras.
And be happy that you were getting an 'official' online stream to watch Cricket for IPL (last) year and World Cup. That doesn't happen in football.
And ICC did the right thing by not letting those retarded News Channels enter the venue. I'm sure one of them was India TV who were sprouting shite about how matches have been fixed. Bunch of morons.
My source is not wrong. BCCI got into a deal with ESPNStar for providing an online stream and YouTube updates for Indian people. And the match stream was butterly smooth.
And online coverage exclusive for people living in India.They discussed % of royalties, that's all.
Living in India, I could the matches smoothly on my computer. I could also watch the highlights on ESPNStar's YouTube channel at any time I wanted. I don't need anything else.
Poor coverage of Cricket in Americas and many European countries is down to it not being a global sport.
Quite funnily, the president of ICC is Sharad Pawar - not a gora.
And online coverage exclusive for people living in India.
Honestly, you are creating much ado about nothing.
Lastly, I'm neither a fan of Cricket nor of ICC/BCCI - but as far as my experience of this World Cup is concerned. It was top notch.
Living in India, I could the matches smoothly on my computer. I could also watch the highlights on ESPNStar's YouTube channel at any time I wanted. I don't need anything else.
@tovishal2001 This ain't fight club. There's a separate section for that.
Now, if you are so bent upon in blaming BCCI and Indians then carry on, because I am done here. There is no point hitting my head on wall. Because you have made up your mind that you are ok with pathetic video quality. I am not.
Either contribute to debate or sit quiet. Throwing mango from outside fence doesn't make you look mature buddy.
The quality is fine:Because you have made up your mind that you are ok with pathetic video quality. I am not.
Time to shut up for a while mate. Where have I taken any potshot on BCCI or on Indians?In the end, I will say you got no clue how things work but have popped up your head just to take potshots at BCCI and Indians.
Either contribute to debate or sit quiet. Throwing mango from outside fence doesn't make you look mature buddy.
Exactly. I watch all football matches on Internet through Internet streams as I don't have a TV. I know how much I have to search for a working stream. Most stutter after every second, most have sh!t quality, some have some weird language commentary. The good ones have very high bitrate and they'd not even run properly on 1mbps connections. Hardly anyone has a 512kbps connection in India.As if you look so mature by debating on something only you have a problem with. If you want good quality cricket video, watch it on TV.
You don't find internet coverage for other sports - heck for Football and Tennis too. But we had for Cricket.Secondly, what do you mean by "be happy that you were getting an 'official' online stream to watch Cricket for IPL (last) year and World Cup"?
How fast is your Internet?? Most of India is still using 256kbps. That was the maximum which they could get. Better shout on TRAI/DoT and ask them to give us faster Internet.And, how will you justify poor quality of Google videos for IPL as well as WC now? I just checked ESPN channel on utube. Its pathetic quality. If its some western event belonging to Google's country, they won't be so careless to pass around with such mess.
I'm a Hockey player myself. Turf (Goras) and Indian infrastructual incompetence are both equally responsible.And lastly, if you want examples of Gora's duplicity, look at Indian hockey.