Nokia6680 and 6681, does they worth their price?
- Status
drgrudge
Another Brick in the Wall
If you just see the cost , then Nokia 9500 when launched was 41k 
It's 35k now. We can get a lappy in that price.
Just if you see the price and the features then it's not worth. Like we get 40k speakers of altec lansing, we have to hear sounds from that speakers, the BASS it offers and clarity and stuffs, we need to hear it and then coment.. same way the Nokia 6680 also.. just if you see the price and the features, it may not be worth.
It's 35k now. We can get a lappy in that price. Just if you see the price and the features then it's not worth. Like we get 40k speakers of altec lansing, we have to hear sounds from that speakers, the BASS it offers and clarity and stuffs, we need to hear it and then coment.. same way the Nokia 6680 also.. just if you see the price and the features, it may not be worth.
Keith Sebastian
Padawan
bukaida - nothing is worth it's price in India. Reason - weak Rupee value.
-Keith
-Keith
rollcage
AMD user for 9 yrs!!
Keith Sebastian said:
Very True..
Like 6681 is priced around $ 499
Value of rupee should be incresed ... I Say 7 to 9 times the $ can be
a realistic rate.
Dr. Manmohan Singh can do it ... he is a genius
<Although i didnt gave my vote to congress>
We have a great Trinity ..
Dr. Manmohan - PM
The gr8 Dr. A.P.J. Abul Kalam - The President
And the FM - P.Chidambaram
I hope they can make things better ... the way Dr. Manmohan did in 1991 finance policy
and if he dont hav to do ji soniya ji
Keith Sebastian
Padawan
I read that 6680 has a lose (rear) camera cover which opens easily and when you don't intend it to open. Read Russel Beattie's review, posted in this section. *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25337
Also the front camera is awkwardly positioned, and when the phone is held normally it focuses on the ceiling instead of the users face.
Keith
Also the front camera is awkwardly positioned, and when the phone is held normally it focuses on the ceiling instead of the users face.
Keith
The 6681 was not a replacement for the 6680. It was just a cheaper, less feature-rich version of the 6680. IT lacks the second cam and some other stuff. On paper though, the 6680 looks good. I have no idea about these problems plaguing it Maybe Nokia overlooked some details.
Maybe Nokia overlooked some details.
Charley
Just Do It
Nemesis said:
Yes it is cheaper than 6680 ......
But has much more improved[rich] features than 6680 ... It has a better display and a lens cover than 6680. And also not to forget the 3G support, video camera is mounted on the front cover and the memory is bigger in this model.
Mate, you have the two phones confused. 6680 is the one with 3G support, a second cam [video cam for video conferencing] and more memory.
Besides, both phones have a sliding lens cover and a 262k display. Check it out for yourself:
6680
6681
Do you really think that Nokia will give you more features at a lower price?
Besides, both phones have a sliding lens cover and a 262k display. Check it out for yourself:
6680
6681
Do you really think that Nokia will give you more features at a lower price?
c.....mobile has become style symbol.........so ppl keeps on changing it everytime......once they c their frnd got the same stuff......since its new...nokia will try to reduce the burden on ppls pocket to them....when theyll come to know...mor stuff sold of same thing.....they will try to bring new models....and try to reduce xcess stock to limit.......also sometimes flop models r sold damn
cheaper but with there profit margin reduced(e.g 7710)....but r damn good phones
cheaper but with there profit margin reduced(e.g 7710)....but r damn good phones
- Status