Sir, it's not me who want Factory OC'ed GPU, you guys have told me to get, especially Vicky. That's why I was thinking of it. Actually I really have short time to see the Reviews, but you said I ought to, and I accept that. You are right.actually ithehappy i see that you are thinking the 'factory oced 560' are better. but my dear friend it is that factory oc that allows 560 to perform close to 6950 1GB. since you are buying a gpu sometimess try to take out a little time for seeing reviews. no offense here buddy but you ought to.
Will see this comparison later.see these -
Radeon HD 6950 1GB vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti review
MSI N560GTX Ti Twin Frozer II review
Okay, point taken, +1 to 6950 then.you will see after twin frozr 560 which is factory oced matches a 6950 1gb stock. (6950 2gb and 1gb are equal in performance)
see more taxing games like metro 2033 and crysis warhead.
(avoid farcry 2 which is biased)
now you will also want to see that multi gpu scaling of a 6950 1gb is much better.
Radeon HD 6950 CrossfireX review
sometimes 2x thee performance. impressive? yes.
I willand the best is 6950 2GB. lot of them are being unlocked to 6970 2GB now a days. get one from HIS. order online. higher chances of safe unlocking. its at 17k~. another option i gave you.
Okay, taken this too.
i anit asking you to go for a 6950 1gb and not 560. its your choice. but do take all factors in mind.
Yea I want PhysX for sure but for PhysX only I won't give up 6950.some people will say tessalation but 6950 1gb is very good at that especially at medium set. and tessalation is a very long way to become a norm.
some will argue that you can oc 560 further. but then you can oc 6950 1gb also further. and that sapphire one has a after market cooler. and they will say oced 560 performs better. but the clocks on the net were 560 was at 970 and 6950 at 820 and 6950 gave full compition to it. and no one will like to burn their card by ocing it to extreme levels.
now if you want physx then 560ti.
@ ithehappy
The 560 twin frozr II runs cooler while 6950 1 gb consumes a bit less power. Their performance is equal. But in 560 , you get physx and 3d as additional options. 6950 can also do 3d but the options are very scarce and is at its infancy whereas nvidia is much more mature.
Since both the performances are equal at full hd resolutions( 1920x 1080) my recommendation is the msi twin frozr II GTX 560.
^^ Clocks of different architectures cannot be matched and compared. AMD is following ILP while nvidia is going TLP way. They are different and have different core and shader clocks. 6950 performs best at those clocks so it gets those while factory overclocked 560's give better performance at higher clocks. Thats why we have more factory overclocked gtx 560's than 6950 1gb because it affects more of the former's performance and responds better. I have heard many say as the gtx 560 being an underclocked card.
Btw msi twin frozr II GTx 560 is 870mhz and not 970 mhz and it is compared with a 820 mhz 6950 in that review. Out of the box, msi twin frozr II gtx 560 is equal in performance with a 6950 1gb. So its absolutely safe to go with either cards without any heating issue.
The 560 twin frozr II runs cooler while 6950 1 gb consumes a bit less power. Their performance is equal. But in 560 , you get physx and 3d and better tesselation as additional options. 6950 can also do 3d but the options are very scarce and is at its infancy whereas nvidia is much more mature.
Since both the performances are equal at full hd resolutions( 1920x 1080) my recommendation is the msi twin frozr II GTX 560.
i said its equal in performance
I mentioned about tessalation before. and physx i agree is a plus point. i said it before. and the plus point of 6950 is its better crossfire performance and the performance at stock. another was better medium set tessalation but leave that as no use.
+1 to 6950.In a nutshell:
6950 1gb = Factory overclocked gtx 560( Except gigabyte gtx 560 as this card is unmatched) at same price point.
+3 to 6950[B said:6950 pros:[/B] Better crossfire performance with anti aliasing on. Has eyefinity and performs well at 5760 x 1200 across three or more monitors for a xfire config. Consumes relatively bit less power. Offers 3d but options are scarce and is lacking support both in terms of 3d hardware and software. Has good overclocking headroom.
+4 to GTX560[B said:Factory oced GTX 560 pros[/B]: Offers great performance at 1920 x 1080 resolutions. Has better tesselation performance (Nvidia cards have better tesselation performance than amd cards this generation). Offers physx support. Offers 3d which is very mature in nvidia platform and 3d hardware and software support is excellent. Options for a 3d surround setup with 3 3d monitors with a 560 sli are possible too. Runs relatively cooler and has therefore more overclocking headroom.
Thanks for the clarification.Stock 6950cf performs better than a stock gtx 560 sli but not that much difference. Factory overclocked gtx 560 sli will bridge the gap between itself and 6950cf and difference is negligible at full hd resolutions. At Ultra high resolutions such a 2560 x 1600 , 6950 cf performs better.
The card we have mentioned ( Msi twin frozr II GTX 560 ) is a factory overclocked gtx 560 and is priced same as a stock gtx 560 and a 6950 1gb.
it performas better. thats what we were saying now.
and 6950 should be +3 there
P.S.actually amd hd3d has just started. so not a mature thing right now. i want something like physx from amd and everything leveled up. then we can solely compare performance. hope something willl be there. just my opinions.