NoasArcAngel
Wise Old Owl
I recently ordered a pair of klipsch image s3 from flipkart and received them this morning. So i wanted to review them properly.
No images because my camera sucks. and i thought what the hell its better to post no image than to post a bad one.
Now this review will be done in a different way. i will not be covering what comes in the box and all and not giving the technical specifications i will only be talking about the sound in detail and some other things.
Firstly to anyone who is reading the review i want to make a few things clear :
1. I am not a very big believer of burn - in . so i am doing this review with a fresh piece of earphones
2. I mainly listen to trance , house and progressive electronic music. And no i do not listen to dubstep . to give you an idea of the tracks i would be using to test this
1. veracocha carte blanche
2. veracocah carte blanche cosmic gate remix
3. paul van dyk for an angel 1998
4. paul van dyk binary finary 1999
so i basically listen to trance in the period 1992-2010 .
3. My music taste : because of the nature of the songs i listen to i like to keep the bass and lower mids to a factor where the overshadow the upper mids and keep the highs to a little lower volume
i dont like boomy bass . and trance songs do not have such a bass .
I will be testing the earphones with :
a ) nokia e63 with custom eq
b ) ipod shuffle 4th gen with custom eq
c ) pc with standard realtek audio card.
Audio gear i have used :
shure se 315
grado sr 60
razer piranha
philips shp1900
denon ah-c452
bang and olufsen earset 3i
i dont own all of them but i have used all of them
I am writing this review while listening to the song on the earphones
Bass :
Bass is pretty punchy . Not as tight as a shure se 315.
The low frequency range 30 - 100 hz is clearly played and gives a good punch to the sound.
And clearly the eq on my ipod is working
on a few tracks with very heavy detail the sound clarity is missing. ( tiesto adagio for strings ferry corsten remix ), but then again even my grado is almost only able to handle this song and its unfair to compare this to a grado sr 60. If i increase the volume even a little the clarity in the grado goes to the rubbish bin .
On the rest of the tracks this works beautifully. The bass is amazing. The lower notes are too good.
Bass maybe not boomy but this is how i love it .
Mids :
Frequency ranges upto 5000-7000 hz are very well played. There is a lot of crispness to the sound . The vocals in this range also sound very good. Although i admit that the soundstage is not that good. In many other models i used even the dirt cheap vfm philips shp1900 have a very very good soundstage.
The balance between the lower notes of the mid 1000hz and the bass region 100hz the difference is very very evident and in many earphones i have used you cannot tell that difference.
Highs :
Frequency ranges above 15000hz become a little distorted. The highs lack clarity when you play songs with very high detail and sometimes the highs start to bleed out. you can feel unbalanced highs in the sound. most of the times the highs are very well maintained and they blend very well with the whole sound .
Misc :
- heavy detail music causes sound quality to decrease a lot, you will feel as though you are using ipod earphones. i think that is because small
driver size
- soundstage is not that great
- need to have a very precise eq for the correct sound
- highs bleed out again with songs with a lot of detail
- perfect for use at moderate volume sound quality is retained
overall rating : 4/5 (for sound)
I have hardly made comparisons with other earphones because most people may not have heard them and its pretty thoughtless to do such comparisons.
Note of advise :
if you listen to music with a lot of detail, these arent probably for you. but even then depending on how you set the eq you can manage to get amazing sound. i am going to tinker with the eq and post results.
UPDATE : apparently the ipod SQ does suck . and after listening to the same song on my nokia e63. The Sound is 10x better. The bass is much more tight, punchy and the mids are crystal clear. the highs are much better now, very less bleeding and the clarity has improved a lot in the high detail tracks i can heard sounds much more clearly.
UPDATE : listening to cosmic gate FAV. And i am loving these IEM's . They are pretty much one of the best budget IEM's in this range.
UPDATE : Listening to cliffe coenraad - gone south the sq is very good .
i love the pouch which comes with the IEM's and i can store my ipod shuffle 4th gen .
UPDATE : I just set the volume on the ipod to normal maybe becasue the output was tuned to give 100% more sound . it may have caused some problems in SQ. will also check this for my nokia e63
No images because my camera sucks. and i thought what the hell its better to post no image than to post a bad one.
Now this review will be done in a different way. i will not be covering what comes in the box and all and not giving the technical specifications i will only be talking about the sound in detail and some other things.
Firstly to anyone who is reading the review i want to make a few things clear :
1. I am not a very big believer of burn - in . so i am doing this review with a fresh piece of earphones
2. I mainly listen to trance , house and progressive electronic music. And no i do not listen to dubstep . to give you an idea of the tracks i would be using to test this
1. veracocha carte blanche
2. veracocah carte blanche cosmic gate remix
3. paul van dyk for an angel 1998
4. paul van dyk binary finary 1999
so i basically listen to trance in the period 1992-2010 .
3. My music taste : because of the nature of the songs i listen to i like to keep the bass and lower mids to a factor where the overshadow the upper mids and keep the highs to a little lower volume
i dont like boomy bass . and trance songs do not have such a bass .
I will be testing the earphones with :
a ) nokia e63 with custom eq
b ) ipod shuffle 4th gen with custom eq
c ) pc with standard realtek audio card.
Audio gear i have used :
shure se 315
grado sr 60
razer piranha
philips shp1900
denon ah-c452
bang and olufsen earset 3i
i dont own all of them but i have used all of them
I am writing this review while listening to the song on the earphones
Bass :
Bass is pretty punchy . Not as tight as a shure se 315.
The low frequency range 30 - 100 hz is clearly played and gives a good punch to the sound.
And clearly the eq on my ipod is working
on a few tracks with very heavy detail the sound clarity is missing. ( tiesto adagio for strings ferry corsten remix ), but then again even my grado is almost only able to handle this song and its unfair to compare this to a grado sr 60. If i increase the volume even a little the clarity in the grado goes to the rubbish bin .
On the rest of the tracks this works beautifully. The bass is amazing. The lower notes are too good.
Bass maybe not boomy but this is how i love it .
Mids :
Frequency ranges upto 5000-7000 hz are very well played. There is a lot of crispness to the sound . The vocals in this range also sound very good. Although i admit that the soundstage is not that good. In many other models i used even the dirt cheap vfm philips shp1900 have a very very good soundstage.
The balance between the lower notes of the mid 1000hz and the bass region 100hz the difference is very very evident and in many earphones i have used you cannot tell that difference.
Highs :
Frequency ranges above 15000hz become a little distorted. The highs lack clarity when you play songs with very high detail and sometimes the highs start to bleed out. you can feel unbalanced highs in the sound. most of the times the highs are very well maintained and they blend very well with the whole sound .
Misc :
- heavy detail music causes sound quality to decrease a lot, you will feel as though you are using ipod earphones. i think that is because small
driver size
- soundstage is not that great
- need to have a very precise eq for the correct sound
- highs bleed out again with songs with a lot of detail
- perfect for use at moderate volume sound quality is retained
overall rating : 4/5 (for sound)
I have hardly made comparisons with other earphones because most people may not have heard them and its pretty thoughtless to do such comparisons.
Note of advise :
if you listen to music with a lot of detail, these arent probably for you. but even then depending on how you set the eq you can manage to get amazing sound. i am going to tinker with the eq and post results.
UPDATE : apparently the ipod SQ does suck . and after listening to the same song on my nokia e63. The Sound is 10x better. The bass is much more tight, punchy and the mids are crystal clear. the highs are much better now, very less bleeding and the clarity has improved a lot in the high detail tracks i can heard sounds much more clearly.
UPDATE : listening to cosmic gate FAV. And i am loving these IEM's . They are pretty much one of the best budget IEM's in this range.
UPDATE : Listening to cliffe coenraad - gone south the sq is very good .
i love the pouch which comes with the IEM's and i can store my ipod shuffle 4th gen .
UPDATE : I just set the volume on the ipod to normal maybe becasue the output was tuned to give 100% more sound . it may have caused some problems in SQ. will also check this for my nokia e63
Last edited: