FF is not perfect and has its share of defects. The question is HOW come IE is SO MUCH WORSE, even though it has been around and WORKED ON for much longer time and by a the most resource rich organizztion.
If FF can do very decently with the MILD number of defects and the PROMPTNESS at which they address the issues, HOW COME MS CANNOT DO BETTER than Mozilla.
They are (supposedly) professional programmers charging GOOD amounts of money for their work (part of their os). Are they that incompetent, or that unwilling to do a relatively decent job?
If Ou was objective he would NOT SIDESTEP the simple issue that IE has ALREADY been worked on for much longer time than FF. It is very strange that inspite of the tons of patches on IE and ms windows, this piece of s/w has been generating severe vulnerabilities constantly with the exception of the recent respite.