Technically, even if you use the whole disk space a single unit, that's still a partition. But let's assume that you're asking about dividing your HDD into more than one partition.I just got a new PC with a 1TB HDD. I do not know how to make partitions in the HDD and dont know the benifits of the same. Hence havent made any.
So I want to know if it is essential to make partitions in the drive?
There's no guarantee that the other partitions will not be affected, but it does reduce the possibility.Does it mean that in case of a crash or a virus attack the other partitions do not get affected?
Most modern hard disks use a single platter. Partitioning allocates different areas of the platter to the partitions. It's like dividing a one-storey building into separate rooms.I find this weird since it isnt a physical seperation of drives. I though partitioning is done based on the number of platters on the HDD :roll:
That's correct, as long as everything's working normally. But there are times when something goes wrong with a file or folder and affects other data in the same partition, but not those in another partition. I've seen it happen from time to time, once to my own computer.As long as you are able to keep the files organised and dont have any difficulty in finding any file. I'd say you can do without extra partition.
P.s= make a big chain of folders to keep things organised.
As I said before, it's a matter of personal preference.I personally don't like partitioning my HDD but I atleast make two partitions, one for the OS only and another for everything else including programs. This saves me a lot of headache when OS needs to be reinstalled for whatever reason. More than 2 partitions are really unnecessary as your contiguous block of free space reduces if you have many partitions and your files are scattered across each of them.
There are crashes where the hard disk is not dead, but just needs a bit of maintenance. I've seen it happen several times to clients' computers and once to my own. Like when the partition table gets partly corrupted, or the FAT file in a FAT32 partition, or a bad sector (due to power fluctuations, not age) that makes a whole partition inaccessible.Portioning is usually done so that when partition is affected by virus or get corrupted, data in other partitions remain safe but if the HDD itself crashes, then partitioning won't help you.
Leave the unallocated partition alone and Ubuntu's installer will do the rest.after shrinking the original partition should I leave it alone or make another partition of the extra memory that I have just freed?
More plainly should I allocate the secondary partition before or during the ubuntu installation? Does it automatically become secondary partition or I have to do something?
Using different partitions for Ubuntu is not supported by Ubuntu's installer, neither it is easy to create manually (for a "newbie to Linux") and you shouldn't bother to create one unless you are a power user.Also as ico said 3partitions for Ubuntu? Is that a hard rule or the best way of doing it?
Newbies are always welcome by me.I am a complete newbie so bear with me.