Kniwor
Learner
Re: All Graphics Cards related queries here.
dude, u should read the First Line of my post(All the games now, or in near future(atleast for next 15 months) will support DX9 very well), tell me a game which is only DX10, no DX9 support...... you wont be seeing such games for quite some time, so, by DX10 game I mean, the one which has DX10 features as well.... that 8600GTS can use... and even after that 7900GT running that game will give better eyecandy... I guess you will agree to me here...
and here's a little something on performance of DX10 over DX9, it gives more features, but not higher performance.... Infact the DX10 code is slower
*www.firingsquad.com/hardware/lost_planet_demo_directx_10_performance/page2.asp
you are seriously wrong here, 1950Pro by no means is faster than 7900GT.
Higher performance in 1~2 games does not make card faster, it looses out in most games....
The only point I can agree to u is that if one is going to keep the cards for next 3 years, he should maybe get 8600's with DX10 support, but in that case, by that time the card will be almost useless, and unable to play any modern games anyhow, so again, the whole point is lost. If u are a gamer, you will change the card in a year and half.... where again, buying a DX9 card makes sense.
I am really confused at your conclusion, what is the point in being able to turn on the effects if u cannot play a game with them turned on, a 7900 card will allow you to play the same game with more eyecandy than 8600, that's my whole point.....
consider the case that the 7300's had HDR support, I'm sure not a single soul was able to play a game on 7300 with HDR on..... hope u get my point...
Funny that review u gave shows 8600's is slower than the 7900's(overall)....lol..
In the end, it is psychologically hard to accept that older is better, but it is, and I never suggested buying new 7900's, get used ones yaar..... save money, and buy a 8800 later..... If u have 7600GT or above, keep it for some time, let the 8800's get cheaper, let the ATI/nVidia DX10 battle heat up.... All I'm saying is, this is a really bad time to buy mid segment DX10 cards, namely 8600's, they are ridiculously priced at the moment, and in no way justify their performance...
deathvirus_me said:Ummm .. NO ... a dx9.0c compatible card , whatever it may be .. will NOT be able to render dx10 in any form .. if u have any doubts , try the dx10 samples in the latest directx SDK ...
As far as it goes about performance .. definitely a 7900GT is better than a 8600GTS .. but considering the current situation , its really hard to make a choice ... one gives better performance and no dx10 , while the other has dx10 and less performance .. if dx10 does give a performance boost over dx9.0c , the 8600GTS might be able to get close to a 7900GT , and then a 8600GTS would definitely be better ... but right now , anything like a 7900GT,7950GT is worth every bit of money ..
dude, u should read the First Line of my post(All the games now, or in near future(atleast for next 15 months) will support DX9 very well), tell me a game which is only DX10, no DX9 support...... you wont be seeing such games for quite some time, so, by DX10 game I mean, the one which has DX10 features as well.... that 8600GTS can use... and even after that 7900GT running that game will give better eyecandy... I guess you will agree to me here...
and here's a little something on performance of DX10 over DX9, it gives more features, but not higher performance.... Infact the DX10 code is slower
*www.firingsquad.com/hardware/lost_planet_demo_directx_10_performance/page2.asp
smit said:*www.legitreviews.com/article/486/9/
see for yourself 8600 GT beats 7900 GT in rainbow: las vegas without overclocking
*www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTMyNCw2LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
here is the link where both 8600 GTS cards are beating Ati 1950 pro which is faster than 7900 GT without overclocking.
also, the reason why i said you should because is the most the overclockable card ever built.... don't believe me just the see for yourself
*vr-zone.com/?i=4925&s=1
so my point is future games will be sharder based, therefore 86xxx series will beat 7900 GS/GT cards on the newupcoming games not to mention it uses low power supply
you are seriously wrong here, 1950Pro by no means is faster than 7900GT.
Higher performance in 1~2 games does not make card faster, it looses out in most games....
keith_j_snyder2 said:See my dear friend.U are not paying attention.If u think from my point of view u will see how right i am.
No doubt that 7900 GT is better than 8600 GT because the 8600 GT is the Dx10 version of 7600 GT.
If u really wanna compare then compare the 8800 GTS with 7900 GT.There u will see the performance.
All i am saying is not everyone is loaded like u.Your config. might cost around 60-70 K but then also no one change their system min. for 1 year....well for almost 3 years.Well in that case if u are saying that everyone should buy a DX9(New Card) then i will say it again ITS A WASTAGE OF MONEY.The Dx10 card can also run DX 9 games asa well as DX 10 game.So if 7900 GT cost around 10K then i will say go for 8600 GT for lesser price.Although its not that performance with 8600 GT as compared to 7900 GT IN DX 9 but u also have the advantage of DX 10.
The only point I can agree to u is that if one is going to keep the cards for next 3 years, he should maybe get 8600's with DX10 support, but in that case, by that time the card will be almost useless, and unable to play any modern games anyhow, so again, the whole point is lost. If u are a gamer, you will change the card in a year and half.... where again, buying a DX9 card makes sense.
If u will read my post more carefully, I have suggested 8800 cards for buying, because they are actually performance for money...... and the best buy at the moment, But one might not have that much money...keith_j_snyder2 said:Well in your words all those guys who have bought the 8800 GTX & GTS are the real LOSERS?
No my friend they are not losers they are the far sighters.
keith_j_snyder2 said:Dude not everyone can change the system like u do.Besides this there is a new thing(which u haven't heard of) "FUTURE PROOFING".
The 8600 GT is the value for money.If u have 10,000/- & u buy a 7900GT & after 1 year u sell it & buy a better card,i think u should save the money for later upgrade like RAM,processor,or any other thing.Besides the 8600 GT is not lagging in any of the game.
But if the 7900 GT is comming for 5-7K then there is no harm in having it rather than 8600 GT.
But still i will suggest all of u people out there that buy 8600 GT rather than 7900 GT because think about SM 4.0,DX 10,and HDR+AA that the 8600 GT can do but no 7900 GT can!!!!!!!
ALL I AM TALKING ABOUT OPTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!
I am really confused at your conclusion, what is the point in being able to turn on the effects if u cannot play a game with them turned on, a 7900 card will allow you to play the same game with more eyecandy than 8600, that's my whole point.....
consider the case that the 7300's had HDR support, I'm sure not a single soul was able to play a game on 7300 with HDR on..... hope u get my point...
keith_j_snyder2 said:Smit has another point about drivers but check these reviews:
*www.legitreviews.com/article/486/1/
U will see how the 8600 GTS or 8600 GT is better than 7900 GT.
If u wanna real comparison then compare the 7900 GTX & 8800 GTS(320MB) then u will see the difference.
Funny that review u gave shows 8600's is slower than the 7900's(overall)....lol..
In the end, it is psychologically hard to accept that older is better, but it is, and I never suggested buying new 7900's, get used ones yaar..... save money, and buy a 8800 later..... If u have 7600GT or above, keep it for some time, let the 8800's get cheaper, let the ATI/nVidia DX10 battle heat up.... All I'm saying is, this is a really bad time to buy mid segment DX10 cards, namely 8600's, they are ridiculously priced at the moment, and in no way justify their performance...
Last edited: