GPU NEWS Channel

Krow

Crowman
And its supposed to run cooler (40 nm!!!)!!! Will it consume lesser power than 4890? I am talking about both 5850 and 5870.
 
OP
comp@ddict

comp@ddict

EXIT: DATA Junkyard
ZOMG!!!! Some AIR COOLED HD4770s
*img200.imageshack.us/img200/5774/16232c3d.jpg

*img132.imageshack.us/img132/42/16401.jpg

*img197.imageshack.us/img197/6410/3d0616361.jpg

THE BEST IS YET TO COME!!!!
*i438.photobucket.com/albums/qq108/riskatoft/wr3d06.jpg
 

desiibond

Bond, Desi Bond!
ATI Catalyst 9.9 WHQL Released


AMD released version 9.9 of its ATI Catalyst driver suite that provides drivers and related essential software for ATI Radeon graphics processors, AMD 7-series core-logic, and ATI Multimedia products. This release mainly intends to fix application-specific issues, and features related to Catalyst Control Center application. For more details, refer to the Release Notes document. Highlights include:

•Anti-Aliasing support for Ghostbusters
•ATI CrossFireX support for Resident Evil 5
•Graphics corruption fix for Sims 3
•Catalyst Control Center - Basic now responds properly after exiting Quick Adjust Video Settings
•Edge enhancement and de-noise sliders in Catalyst Control Center no longer lags or appears out of sync with mouse movement
•Launching Hotkeys Manager in Catalyst Control Center no longer causes an unhandled exception error
•The "Desktop Rotation" page in Catalyst Control Center no longer shows additional information for the second display when the secondary adapter is connected
•HDMI is now detected properly as DTV (HDMI) instead of DTV (DVI) when the HDMI display is hotplugged for the first time
•Catalyst Control Center no longer displays error message when specific HDMI displays are hot unplugged and hotplugged back
•Intermittent failures no longer occur with MediaShow Espresso once a transcoding process has been completed

*techpowerup.com/103620/ATI_Catalyst_9.9_WHQL_Released.html
 

hellknight

BSD init pwns System V
Hey guys what are your views on GTS 250 based cards.. my friend wants to go for a NVIDIA based card.. so i'm thinking that GTS 250 should be a better option.. its cheap around 7.5k I guess..
 
OP
comp@ddict

comp@ddict

EXIT: DATA Junkyard
For 7k, I STRONGLY SUGGEST:

Sahh[ire HD4770 512MB GDDR5 Artic Accelero @ 7.5k

It's a STEALLL, and better than GTS250
 

topgear

Super Moderator
Staff member
For 7k, I STRONGLY SUGGEST:

Sahh[ire HD4770 512MB GDDR5 Artic Accelero @ 7.5k

It's a STEALLL, and better than GTS250

I think HD4850 performs better than HD4770 and GTS250 performs a little bit better than HD4850.

I guess you are suggesting that sapphire card for insane gpu ocing and churn out the maximum performance out of HD4770 for Maximum Game :p
 

Krow

Crowman
4770 is not VFM until 4850 leaves the market. It needs a price drop. Okay, maybe I'd buy it and OC, but most people don't do it and rightly so. That way, we have to wait for 57xx to be great and then we can recommend 4770, which will be dirt cheap. Till then GTS 250 is the way to go.
 
OP
comp@ddict

comp@ddict

EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Let me tell you why i recommend HD4770:-

1. 80W TDP(GTS250 has a fckin 141W)
2. 40nm technical process(it's idle and max temps are like kids infront of HD4850 and GTS250)
3. Extreme Overclocablity(GTS250 can go 800MHz, but it already consumes 141W!, HD4850 will burn if you go from 625Mhz to 675MHz on stock cooler).
4. GDDR5 (oh come on, just having GDDR5 on your card is darn sweet!!!)
 

amitash

Intel OCer
^Useless 3rd and 4th points...not many ppl OC and getting a card for gddr5 is like marrying someone because of looks only
 

Krow

Crowman
Point one isnt very valid too. Performance isnt as much as GTS 250 and anyway we always recommend good PSU's to buyers, so no worries.

Anyway, at that price (7.4k), I'd rather buy the GTS 250 than the 4770! Performance matters to me. At a price of say, 6-6.5k, that GFX card would be out of stock everywhere, but not now.
 

Krow

Crowman
^Yeah, 40nm is something which is truly beneficial in terms of component life and performance. :)
 

Krow

Crowman
^6.6k to 7k depending on where you look and much better performance, but still, GTS 250 is better in that segment purely as it is not exactly a frying pan.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom