no SIR
He is talking abt 2 hdd in raid 0 and one hdd separate 4 the os
u know nothing abt raid and u r pointing fingers over others .by connecting 2 hdd in raid 0 he wii get 640GB space and add the other separate 320gb hdd .it becomes 960GB then. Got it?
BOSS... It's true that i made a wrong statement about 640GB.. But, Don't beat around the bush.. I'm surprised that you know that I don't know about RAID(since you are a mind reader or u know Tellipathy).. But it's not Actual RAID, and not fault tollerent.. In case one HDD is down. everything is lost...
I have been in different organizations setting up RAID configurations and servers(I'm surprised that you know that I don't know about RAID(since you are a mind reader or u know Tellipathy))...
Hope this would give u more information..
RAID 0 implements a striped disk array, the data is broken down into blocks and each block is written to a separate disk drive
I/O performance is greatly improved by spreading the I/O load across many channels and drives
Best performance is achieved when data is striped across multiple controllers with only one drive per controller
No parity calculation overhead is involved
Very simple design
Easy to implement
DISADVANTAGES
**************
Not a "True" RAID because it is NOT fault-tolerant
The failure of just one drive will result in all data in an array being lost
Should never be used in mission critical environments
*www.acnc.com/img/shared/dot_clear.gif
Not a "True" RAID because it is NOT fault-tolerant
The failure of just one drive will result in all data in an array being lost
Should never be used in mission critical environments
*www.acnc.com/img/shared/dot_clear.gif
LET US STOP THIS DISCUSSION
************************
When we clap both hands only we will hear voice.. So i'm taking my hand back..
I just noticed about a mistake written there.. This seems to be be getting like an argument..
Insulting each other.. It's not good.. Our Typical indian behaviour..
I bought the HDD from GuruBhai and i think it's reasonable price..
Also i'm satisfied with SEAGATE performance.. With my experience seagate is always good.. I'm already having a Seagate 80 GB(used only for torrent downloads, continuously running 24x7, if it's Western Digital u will never know when it will go down).. and two 250 GB SATA 3G's.. It's been good to be with Seagate.. Perfectly running..
You may get a Western Digital Carivar 750 GB for 8500/-.. even though i'm not ready for that try.. Because I prefer to use what i'm satified and experienced with..
Thanks.. GuruBhai, UTSAV and all other nice persons participated in this..
CHEERS
NITHIN
MySYSTEM *dreamworksindia.no-ip.org