Dont Throw your CD-RW if it is not working

Status
Not open for further replies.
Krazy_About_Technology

Krazy_About_Technology

Padawan
Yaar why some of you do unnecessary nagging? he's just saying that it happens on Win 98. If you can, do it, otherwise dont. Whats the point of saying all that stuff. I am sorry if i'm sounding rude but it kinda feels awkward when on Digit forum people do childish things.

I do agree, Win 98 is a lil better at reading damaged CDROM media, although not true for DVDs (perhaps because of their smaller track width). When i had both of them in dual boot config, 98 use to read some CDs rejected by XP. But it hanged many times while doing that. XP and Vista sometimes have problems, maybe because of the extra HAL layer in them. Vista has improved a lil in my personal openion over XP though.

Cool G5 said:
Cool.
I am missing Windows 98.It was robust & a speedy OS.
Click to expand...

It was speedy but robust :shock: :shock: what are you saying man:mrgreen: :mrgreen:

iMav said:
the best feature of 98 that i miss a lot is .... u can view different volumes of a multi session disc by just right clicking and choosing the volume trust me it was/is the best way to not show things to ppl....
Click to expand...

Just FYI, The multisession viewing and switching capability was added by Nero in 98. It was not by default present there.
 
Last edited:
OP
G

goldy_connect

Broken In
iMav said:
the best feature of 98 that i miss a lot is .... u can view different volumes of a multi session disc by just right clicking and choosing the volume trust me it was/is the best way to not show things to ppl....
Click to expand...

Thanks,

I am 100% agree with you. Old is always ever gold.

Krazy_About_Technology said:
Yaar why some of you do unnecessary nagging? he's just saying that it happens on Win 98. If you can, do it, otherwise dont. Whats the point of saying all that stuff. I am sorry if i'm sounding rude but it kinda feels awkward when on Digit forum people do childish things.

I do agree, Win 98 is a lil better at reading damaged CDROM media, although not true for DVDs (perhaps because of their smaller track width). When i had both of them in dual boot config, 98 use to read some CDs rejected by XP. But it hanged many times while doing that. XP and Vista sometimes have problems, maybe because of the extra HAL layer in them. Vista has improved a lil in my personal openion over XP though.



It was speedy but robust :shock: :shock: what are you saying man:mrgreen: :mrgreen:



Just FYI, The multisession viewing and switching capability was added by Nero in 98. It was not by default present there.
Click to expand...

Yeh, that's true I am asking them to try not install windows 98. I am describing some important features of windows 98. If you have windows 98, then proceed otherwise just forget it.

Cool G5 said:
Cool.
I am missing Windows 98.It was robust & a speedy OS.
Click to expand...

Yes it itue windows 98 is fast and robust. It has some special feature which we miss.

iMav said:
the best feature of 98 that i miss a lot is .... u can view different volumes of a multi session disc by just right clicking and choosing the volume trust me it was/is the best way to not show things to ppl....
Click to expand...

I am agree with u. Windows 98 is better to view the volumes of multisession disc.

fun2sh said:
^^^^^^^^^^^ and from where u got 5 non-wrkin cd-rw???
its impossible if the hardware is corrupt no software can repair it!!
Click to expand...

Some of the cd-rws is mine and some from my friends circle.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom