Cool Buddy
Wise Old Owl
@Aestivial did you get one 1TB or two? You got DS220+ right?
@Aestivial did you get one 1TB or two? You got DS220+ right?
Oh. So we can't test RAID configurations.1TB, and yep DS220+
You got DS220 & still felt it slow, think about those(incl myself) who got much slower(hardware wise) DS120j.Is it just me or the whole things is kinda.... slow?
Is it just me or the whole things is kinda.... slow?
Have you tested the speeds with wifi?u mean transfer rates or web ui?
i have ds120j and there is no problem with transfer rates, the webui would be faster if was connected through rdp. But instead it is just a webpage made to look like desktop.
Have you tested the speeds with wifi?
How do you mean?Is it just me or the whole things is kinda.... slow?
It's a 2 Ghz dual core Celeron, so can't be very fast. Having said that, it is felt only when on the web UI. However, NAS, by it's very design, is not meant to be used directly through its interface, it is only meant to be setup through the interface and accessed remotely. And so far, for me, any form of remote access does not feel slow at all.Is it just me or the whole things is kinda.... slow?
afaik, the OS is designed to run in headless mode and DSM doesn't have a UI at all. Safe to say if it was rendering a full fledged GUI, it would only be slower.u mean transfer rates or web ui?
i have ds120j and there is no problem with transfer rates, the webui would be faster if was connected through rdp. But instead it is just a webpage made to look like desktop.
It's a 2 Ghz dual core Celeron
the OS is designed to run in headless mode and DSM doesn't have a UI at all. Safe to say if it was rendering a full fledged GUI, it would only be slower.
Yes, 120j has Marvell Armada.no its not celeron it is a marvel ARM cpu, different instructions set.
DS220+ has Celeron Dual Core
Definitely. Even the clock speed is much higher, 2 Ghz Vs. 800 Mhz. And not to forget the RAM, which is actually upgradable to 6 GB.that would be significant Bump in performance over Marvell Armada.
NAS is actually meant for streaming stuff & higher the quality, higher will be the load on processor.e.g. try streaming a 10MB/s video bitrate file & you will see.And so far, for me, any form of remote access does not feel slow at all.
I tried with a 1gbps ethernet connection & reached speeds of ~50MB/s which I believe is hardware limitation on 120j as a 7200rpm hdd which is 90% empty should easily achieve around 80-90MB/s speeds.my router only supports 10/100 ethernet and 2.4 G wifi, i transferred a 6.8Gig file. The transfer was pretty smooth with speed of 8.5-8.7 mbps, which is indeed near to 100 megabits/s.
Yupp. Also that processor is not that much capable with just 512MB ramI tried with a 1gbps ethernet connection & reached speeds of ~50MB/s which I believe is hardware limitation on 120j as a 7200rpm hdd which is 90% empty should easily achieve around 80-90MB/s speeds.