Just go here and check the speed of the JS engines yourself: *wd-testnet.world-direct.at/mo...jsTimeTest.htm
gr8 link......!!!
Just go here and check the speed of the JS engines yourself: *wd-testnet.world-direct.at/mo...jsTimeTest.htm
thats wht i m saying....say it took 9.2s to load youtube in firefox. 9s download time + 0.2s rendering time.
in google chrome, it will again be like 9.1s to load youtube. 9s data transfer time + 0.1s rendering time.
difference will be in miliseconds regardless of broadband connection u use.
But it's always best to use the quote button to quote instead of copying and quoting manually.As the link in the quoted text in your post will not work.
![]()
Thats what he's trying to explain. Its the render time. Maybe with some tricks like compression you can download data faster (lesser data). But the high-level view will be the same. If 2 browsers are being compared for their speed the tests should be fair. A browser cannot accelerate your download speed.same page actually took around 11 seconds for IE7![]()
^^crazy..in my machine Opera rocks..Chrome and FF crawls.
Opera 10 is the fastest in HTML/CSS rendering from what I've felt. Though JS engine is still slow. Firefox 3.5 has a blazing fast JS engine but it's still not as fast as Google Chrome's. Both use the Tracemonkey JS engine though.