Just go here and check the speed of the JS engines yourself: *wd-testnet.world-direct.at/mo...jsTimeTest.htm
gr8 link......!!!
Just go here and check the speed of the JS engines yourself: *wd-testnet.world-direct.at/mo...jsTimeTest.htm
thats wht i m saying....say it took 9.2s to load youtube in firefox. 9s download time + 0.2s rendering time.
in google chrome, it will again be like 9.1s to load youtube. 9s data transfer time + 0.1s rendering time.
difference will be in miliseconds regardless of broadband connection u use.
But it's always best to use the quote button to quote instead of copying and quoting manually. As the link in the quoted text in your post will not work.
Thats what he's trying to explain. Its the render time. Maybe with some tricks like compression you can download data faster (lesser data). But the high-level view will be the same. If 2 browsers are being compared for their speed the tests should be fair. A browser cannot accelerate your download speed.same page actually took around 11 seconds for IE7
^^crazy..in my machine Opera rocks..Chrome and FF crawls.
Opera 10 is the fastest in HTML/CSS rendering from what I've felt. Though JS engine is still slow. Firefox 3.5 has a blazing fast JS engine but it's still not as fast as Google Chrome's. Both use the Tracemonkey JS engine though.