krazyfrog said:
Agreed SE has the best camera in the above mentioned price bracket. But sound quality is equally good in 5300.
he 5300 occasionally cuts out basses and lower frequencies. The difference between the handsets doesn’t need to be proven with special tests, basically, anyone can hear it, which is especially disappointing, considering comparable sound quality generated by these two phones in wired headsets. Another shortcoming of Nokia 5300 is the necessity to position both the handset and the headset in a proper way – sound interruptions start popping up if you carry the phone in a bag or running (so that the bag starts reeling). Sony Ericsson’s devices lack such drawback.
It also comes with a 3.5mm adaptor in box.
With the default headset plugged in, the 5300 stays far and far behind Walkman series – music is simply non-penetrating, basses are too quiet, in a nutshell the quality of headset is lower than average.
It also comes with a 256 mb card
Today Nokia recommends (for the sales package) memory cards with 512 Mb onboard for most markets
the 5300 is not a camera-centric phone and therefore carries one of the cheapest solutions, providing fairly poor quality.
Why should any one buy Nokia 5300 with so many disadvantages in compare to SE phones, just only for EDGE, which is yet not useful in India (afaik).
I repeat
IN NO WAY NOKIA IS BEST BUY COMPARING WITH SE K750i/W700i/W800i/W810i