I am, but I won't be posting my opinions to avoid causing a shitstorm.
The TL;DR is that it is a massive step down from Arkham City and feels like it was made just to take advantage of the Arkham name. Its not worth the money.
Please, elaborate. How is it a step-down? Because the game mechanics are same as AC? Is that a step-down? Don't tell me the story's bad, it's one of the best Batman stories, much better than AC and equal to Arkham Asylum's. Batman is more badarse than in AC (IDK why, he's a rookie and he's more badarse
), some new enemies brings something fresh, the detective mode is a HUGE improvement (although easy, it's good to look at and makes you feel more Batman-y). Voice acting is great, Batman's actor did a great job, so did others. And lifeless city? It's because of a winter storm and f**k tons of criminals on the loose.
Since Arkham City achieved the best of Batman, there's little room of improvement in that area. Now if Rocksteady makes another solo Batman game, it'll not be as great as AC felt (just like Assassin's Creed series after ACII).
This game is NOT a step-down from AC, it's not an improvement either. It's on the same level.
Hoping Rocksteady's doing something more than a solo Batman game. I want DCU in video games now.