- Status
i.am_mayur
Broken In
darklord .. ur system configuration is absolutely CRAP dude .. 
u shuld be ashamed of posting it so blatantly
u shuld be ashamed of posting it so blatantly
hey mayur AMD athlon, athlon xp, Athlon 64 alwez hav defeated Intel ones in synthetic tests certainly real world tests r optimized 2 use HT from intel but whenever 64 bit real world tests, its gonna use AMD64 instructions heavily and that will result in AMD b'cumin the winner so INTEL SUX!!! b'coz Intel is JBL now (JBL= JUST A BIG LOSER)
i.am_mayur
Broken In
flash . ure certainly Brain-dead man . Synthetic tests Dont Matter ..
All that matters is SPEED . An there aint nothin faster than Intel .
Even though AMD may take the performance lead ,Intel beats it in terms of Pure speed
AMD can think of coming up with a 3.6 Ghz HT processor only in its DIStant DReamz man ! (maybe after 4-5 yrs when intel would already have clocked ..say 10 GHz!)
Cause AMD simply dont have enough Technology to produce faster chips.. all it can do is compare its chips performance wih intel's
Take for eg when a game loads ,, Intel CPU will load much faster .even though AMD may give 2-3 fps more when done
so all u AMD faanatics .. [Edit Batty] Watch your words
And make sure ur kids dont make the same mistake as u (goin for AMD)
All that matters is SPEED . An there aint nothin faster than Intel .
Even though AMD may take the performance lead ,Intel beats it in terms of Pure speed
AMD can think of coming up with a 3.6 Ghz HT processor only in its DIStant DReamz man ! (maybe after 4-5 yrs when intel would already have clocked ..say 10 GHz!)
Cause AMD simply dont have enough Technology to produce faster chips.. all it can do is compare its chips performance wih intel's
Take for eg when a game loads ,, Intel CPU will load much faster .even though AMD may give 2-3 fps more when done
so all u AMD faanatics .. [Edit Batty] Watch your words
And make sure ur kids dont make the same mistake as u (goin for AMD)
i.am_mayur you're looking at a ban coming up. Stop being silly and abusing. Also, I don't know about everyone else, but your arguements sound ridiculous.
How many of us here would rather have a CPU with 3.6 Gigs written on a box than a processor that out-performs everything else? Personally, I don't care whether Intel or AMD are better, I would buy a CPU / MoBo / RAM / HDD combo that beats everything else hollow! Whether it's a P4 - 3.2 G or an AMD 64 3200 doesn't matter, the ONLY thing that matters are the benchmarks, especially the type of benchmarks which come closest to MY usage pattern: If i'm a gamer, then only the gaming benchmarks interest me, if i'm an office user, then a P4 1.6 or P4 3.2, makes no difference to me, who cares if Microsoft Excel or Word opens 0.2765234587658756234 seconds faster on a P4 3.2—not me, that's for sure!
How many of us here would rather have a CPU with 3.6 Gigs written on a box than a processor that out-performs everything else? Personally, I don't care whether Intel or AMD are better, I would buy a CPU / MoBo / RAM / HDD combo that beats everything else hollow! Whether it's a P4 - 3.2 G or an AMD 64 3200 doesn't matter, the ONLY thing that matters are the benchmarks, especially the type of benchmarks which come closest to MY usage pattern: If i'm a gamer, then only the gaming benchmarks interest me, if i'm an office user, then a P4 1.6 or P4 3.2, makes no difference to me, who cares if Microsoft Excel or Word opens 0.2765234587658756234 seconds faster on a P4 3.2—not me, that's for sure!
hey Mayur Keep ur suggestions with u.
Nobody is stopping u from goin 4 Intel,
after all u r a big genius engg. who has got 1st rank IIT-JEE and is having Computer Engg. at IIT KANPUR,(THIS MAN IS REDICULUS )Who the hell is stopping u??? but an urge here DON'T DARE 2 USE BAD LANGUAGE U $HIT!!!
Don't giv ur f**ky suggestions 2 others.
and 4 temperature problem DISABLE DOT from BIOS as it is enabled by default and overclocks ur PC till 10% in default mode thus increasing performance & temperature as well
Once again we 2 hav got tons of BAD WORDS 4 U DEAD BARIN!!!! but we r different.
Understand!!!
Nobody is stopping u from goin 4 Intel,
after all u r a big genius engg. who has got 1st rank IIT-JEE and is having Computer Engg. at IIT KANPUR,(THIS MAN IS REDICULUS )Who the hell is stopping u??? but an urge here DON'T DARE 2 USE BAD LANGUAGE U $HIT!!!Don't giv ur f**ky suggestions 2 others.
and 4 temperature problem DISABLE DOT from BIOS as it is enabled by default and overclocks ur PC till 10% in default mode thus increasing performance & temperature as well
Once again we 2 hav got tons of BAD WORDS 4 U DEAD BARIN!!!! but we r different.
Understand!!!
allajunaki
Journeyman
hmmm....
anyways 3000+ <> 3.0Ghz P4
(But it comes pretty close,say a hypothetical p4 2.9Ghz).
also Mr. Mayu 'the great' please stop making this into a flame post.. I can use explicits in more creative pattern that will make u regret why grand parents even thought of having kids.
But i dont use 'em here coz this is a technology discussion . U wont make any point by abusing. So please be polite and stop pissing off others.....
hmmm... MODS shouldnt we ban such ppl??
allajunaki said:i.am_mayur
=i.am_sucker
anyways 3000+ <> 3.0Ghz P4
(But it comes pretty close,say a hypothetical p4 2.9Ghz).
also Mr. Mayu 'the great' please stop making this into a flame post.. I can use explicits in more creative pattern that will make u regret why grand parents even thought of having kids.
But i dont use 'em here coz this is a technology discussion . U wont make any point by abusing. So please be polite and stop pissing off others.....
if tis dude got first rank in IIT JEE ,then he copied from 2 ppl (by sheer dumb luck the right answers of each of the guys).[flAsh said:
hmmm... MODS shouldnt we ban such ppl??
According to mayur , its just the frequency which matters , so according to his theory , if a P4 with 4 ghz clock speed and 256k cache and 100 mhz bus speed with work as fast as a P4 4 ghz 1024 mhz bus speed and 2 MB l2 cache ? so why doesnt a p4 and celeron doest give the same performance at the same clock frequency ?
and as far as the technology goes , intel at present have serious problems in scaling the 800 mhz bus speed to 1024 mhz and getting a clock speed of over 3.8 ghz and the heating problems which the prescott had right from the beginning .Why do you think that intel now have started naming their processors as 520 , 540 , 560 , 320 etc ? If AMD was never even close to Intel then Intel wouldnt have never made the P4 EE processors (XEON CUT DOWN VERSION),wouldnt have never increased the BUS speed , the 128 bit memory and other enhancements .Intel have over 165 million transistors in their flagship processors whereas AMD64 flagship processor only has about 109 transistors with IBM's SOI technology.IF intel would had lesser transistors in their processors ,the processors would have run a lot cooler. AMD on the other hand have a very scalable architecture with A64 , which scales very well both in HT link increase from 1600MHZ to 2.0 GHZ ,easy increase in clock speed and at the same time processors have a perfect thermal solution.This was not the case with AMD's barton CPU's .... did anyone tried to overclock a 3200+ xp , its simply unstable , or if you try to overclock any other barton cpu's beyond 3200+ is simply unstable and thats where the A64's come in.This year AMD has the lead over intel no matter what anyone says .Its the truth , face it mayur !
and as far as the technology goes , intel at present have serious problems in scaling the 800 mhz bus speed to 1024 mhz and getting a clock speed of over 3.8 ghz and the heating problems which the prescott had right from the beginning .Why do you think that intel now have started naming their processors as 520 , 540 , 560 , 320 etc ? If AMD was never even close to Intel then Intel wouldnt have never made the P4 EE processors (XEON CUT DOWN VERSION),wouldnt have never increased the BUS speed , the 128 bit memory and other enhancements .Intel have over 165 million transistors in their flagship processors whereas AMD64 flagship processor only has about 109 transistors with IBM's SOI technology.IF intel would had lesser transistors in their processors ,the processors would have run a lot cooler. AMD on the other hand have a very scalable architecture with A64 , which scales very well both in HT link increase from 1600MHZ to 2.0 GHZ ,easy increase in clock speed and at the same time processors have a perfect thermal solution.This was not the case with AMD's barton CPU's .... did anyone tried to overclock a 3200+ xp , its simply unstable , or if you try to overclock any other barton cpu's beyond 3200+ is simply unstable and thats where the A64's come in.This year AMD has the lead over intel no matter what anyone says .Its the truth , face it mayur !
arun said:
First off, Make sure you have proper ventilation in your case, usually one fan drawing air in (most effective if it's drawn from the front or side of the case), and one drawing air out (rear of case), plus one fan in your power supply blowing air out. If you have your PC in non AC'ed generally warm tempuratured room, you might wanto to get a dual fan Power supply. Secondly, 67 celcius is ridiculous for A64 3200+, and is probably the main reason for you vid errors. You should get a new CPU HSF, I would suggest the All Copper xp-120 with a 120mm 3000rpm+ fan, or the Coolermaster Hyper 6 HSF. If you vid card doesn't have a fan on it (although I think the 9800 pro does), then you should get a PCI slot VGA cooler, which is basically a VGA exhaust fan cooler.
OC'ing you CPU with the above mention HSF, you should be 35 celcius or less idle, and 50 celcius max or less.
If your vid card issues don't resolve by getting your temps down, then you may have a vid card or defect.
I have the Hyper 6, and in a house who's ambient temp is around 23 celcius, I keep my cpu at 35 celcius idle, and 43 max load, and thats with my cpu oc'd 250Mhz to 2.25Ghz
- Status