busyanuj said:strange.
i have 10 tabs open across as many sites, still the memory consumption is around 60mb.
nikhil, that's seriously quite strange!NikhilVerma said:Well I actually browsed a lot of sites before closing them and opening think digit ... so wasn't it firefox's duty to unload those sites from the memory ? Strange ! So it's like I open 50 sites and firefox goes 300 MB in memory usage and then I close all those 50 tabs and FF still consumes about the same ... what is that all about ...
And here is another thing ... I opened a webpage whose size was 97MB ! I can't give the link because some images in the page aren't so friendly ... though the site was *encyclopediadramatica.com/ { THE SITE CAN CONTAIN 18+ IMAGES } and my memory consumption increased by 645 Megabytes how can a 97MB page take 645 MB in the memory ? I would never know ...
Tried the same thing in opera and the memory usage increased by ONLY 110MB ! now that is explainable ... but what's up with firefox ? I don't think it can handle heavy pages at all ...
But I guess I have to use it .... No other choice avaliable
ratedrsuperstar said:hey why are you crying dudes all that matters is ff's speed and who cares abt 60 odd mb when everyone has more or almost 256mb ram.It's like not upgrading to vista even if you have the requirements.
busyanuj said:strange.
i have 10 tabs open across as many sites, still the memory consumption is around 60mb.
ankitsagwekar said:1)There are many reported compatibility issues with the large existing libraries of extensions, themes, and plugins currently avaialble for earlier versions of Firefox. While this can, to some degree, be expected, the loss of this huge user contributed extension base is a non-trivial problem with Firefox 2.0, and could be a deal breaker for some people all by itself
4)Reports indicate that episodes of random freezing during use are worse with the 2.0 version, though a cause has not yet been isolated