Movies Discussion Thread V1: Ratings and Opinions

theserpent

Firecracker to the moon
Bang bang - 8 / 10

The movie lacks logic but is surely fun to watch. These reviewers are the same fools who rate mindless salman khan movies 5/5
 

harry10

Gadgets freak
Bang bang is actually bang bang in whole movie. I really Enjoyed. This has to be one of the best action movies of bollywood. The production values are superb.

First half was really good. Second half was a bit dragged in the end. After watching a Katrina movie I always think she can't look better than this and with the next movie she proves me wrong. She looks stunningly beautiful! Hritik is awesome and his 8 packs are amply displayed in entire movie.

It's much better than Knight and day and one can only enjoy in a hall. I guess someone who hasn't scene the English one will have more fun.
Rating- 4/5
 

theserpent

Firecracker to the moon
Bang bang is actually bang bang in whole movie. I really Enjoyed. This has to be one of the best action movies of bollywood. The production values are superb.

First half was really good. Second half was a bit dragged in the end. After watching a Katrina movie I always think she can't look better than this and with the next movie she proves me wrong. She looks stunningly beautiful! Hritik is awesome and his 8 packs are amply displayed in entire movie.

It's much better than Knight and day and one can only enjoy in a hall. I guess someone who hasn't scene the English one will have more fun.
Rating- 4/5

Now this is actually a really honest view man!

- - - Updated - - -

WTF is happening how that crap don (2006) got 7.2 ratings at imdb. All the actual & low rated reviews are shifted to back pages.The front 5-6 pages are filled with stupid ratings. Someone even gave it 10/10 don't know how. This is just stupid.

______________________________________

[STRIKE]Honest[/STRIKE] BIASED bang bang reviews.
Review: Bang Bang is loud, dumb, exhausting - Rediff.com Movies
Movie review: Bang Bang is a waste of time and money : Reviews, News - India Today

Corrected
 

harry10

Gadgets freak
I actually wanted to see Haider first as I like such movies but no show was playing in the multiplex I wanted to see. What amazed me was that people were sitting in front row also for bang bang. This will be a super duper hit.

And Ya defying logic is compulsory in bollywood movies but it's a much much better action movie than the crap Shahrukh and Salman movies are dishing out in last few years.
 

ithehappy

Human Spambot
^^What headphones are you using?
Oh it's a rather cheap one, a V55. It actually came free with my Bravia, and I was using XB300 and didn't even bother to open it as I thought it was a cheapo headphone as it came free, but I was so wrong. Have listened to a lot of headphones in sub 5k range, haven't found a better one than this. Just wish it was more comfortable for long sessions.
 

ajayritik

Technomancer
I haven't seen Krissh but had the misfortune of watching D3 at home. It's in my list of worst top 5 movies ever.

I thought even the newer TV's have remote control provided with them so that if you don't like something you can either switch it off or change the channel.
 

quan chi

mortal kombat
Now this is actually a really honest view man!

- - - Updated - - -



Corrected
If you liked it then its okay nobody is forcing you to dislike it. If movies are rated as per entertainment value only then I would rate awara paagala deewana 9/10. deewane hue paagal 9/10, NO smoking 9.5/10(this movie does entertain irrespective of the fact you understand or you don't understand anything. Btw it does deserve at least 7), dead poets society 1/10, donnie darko 2/10, primer -1/10. The godfather 4/10, dhoom 9.5/10, dhoom 2 9/10,....so on

I am sorry to say no matter how bad a movie is there will be always someone to defend it. But It doesn't change the fact that the movie is dumb & worthless. My focus is more towards the script. BTW my stupid friend paid for this worthless movie so I have seen it too (unfortunately).

This movie looks like a wanna be hollywood sumer blockbuster. I have no objection but atleast have some decent dialogues/script. Moreover they have dragged it unnecessarily as if if any hindi sorry bollywood movie is below 2hrs then its a crime.Hrithik tries his best to reprise the dhoom 2 role. Some action sequences are good to watch but rest are forgettable. Hrithik like srk in chennai express does in movie commercials too. The best way to describe this movie would be kick 2.0.

Katrina is one of the worst actresses ever. Her dialogue delivery is terrible. Her acting is below average. Her dancing skills ( remember kamli, dhoom3) are poor. why is she casted in the movies perhaps we all know. I think I don't have to explain that here explicitly. However still she fails to show what the hollywood heroines show (pun intended) thus she is nowhere near them too from the glamor point of view.

Instead of doing wannbe hollywood if they try something original then i would be happy to watch it. By original I mean there should be enough reason for a situation to occur. You cannot make it appear out of no where. If movies like these becomes a hit in india then....well I think i need a producer some contacts & a 3 days crash course in direction. easy money.
______________________________________________

Oh yes the big question which I still have I bet in 99% of the hindi/indian movies you will see beautiful foreign locations & in 80%(or more than that) of foreign movies you will see the ugly side of india.
 
Last edited:

theserpent

Firecracker to the moon
If you liked it then its okay nobody is forcing you to dislike it. If movies are rated as per entertainment value only then I would rate awara paagala deewana 9/10. deewane hue paagal 9/10, NO smoking 9.5/10(this movie does entertain irrespective of the fact you understand or you don't understand anything. Btw it does deserve at least 7), dead poets society 1/10, donnie darko 2/10, primer -1/10. The godfather 4/10, dhoom 9.5/10, dhoom 2 9/10,....so on

I am sorry to say no matter how bad a movie is there will be always someone to defend it. But It doesn't change the fact that the movie is dumb & worthless. My focus is more towards the script. BTW my stupid friend paid for this worthless movie so I have seen it too (unfortunately).

This movie looks like a wanna be hollywood sumer blockbuster. I have no objection but atleast have some decent dialogues/script. Moreover they have dragged it unnecessarily as if if any hindi sorry bollywood movie is below 2hrs then its a crime.Hrithik tries his best to reprise the dhoom 2 role. Some action sequences are good to watch but rest are forgettable. Hrithik like srk in chennai express does in movie commercials too. The best way to describe this movie would be kick 2.0.

Katrina is one of the worst actresses ever. Her dialogue delivery is terrible. Her acting is below average. Her dancing skills ( remember kamli, dhoom3) are poor. why is she casted in the movies perhaps we all know. I think I don't have to explain that here explicitly. However still she fails to show what the hollywood heroines show (pun intended) thus she is nowhere near them too from the glamor point of view.

Instead of doing wannbe hollywood if they try something original then i would be happy to watch it. By original I mean there should be enough reason for a situation to occur. You cannot make it appear out of no where. If movies like these becomes a hit in india then....well I think i need a producer some contacts & a 3 days crash course in direction. easy money.
______________________________________________

Oh yes the big question which I still have I bet in 99% of the hindi/indian movies you will see beautiful foreign locations & in 80%(or more than that) of foreign movies you will see the ugly side of india.

Well said. But see I do agree that the movie has no logic at all, the more I think of it reading all these comment's it seems to justify that bang bang is senseless,dialogues are just terrible, ONLY ACTION scenes have the made the movie like worth watching
 

amjath

Human Spambot
Katrina is one of the worst actresses ever. Her dialogue delivery is terrible. Her acting is below average. Her dancing skills ( remember kamli, dhoom3) are poor. why is she casted in the movies perhaps we all know. I think I don't have to explain that here explicitly. However still she fails to show what the hollywood heroines show (pun intended) thus she is nowhere near them too from the glamor point of view.

Oh yes the big question which I still have I bet in 99% of the hindi/indian movies you will see beautiful foreign locations & in 80%(or more than that) of foreign movies you will see the ugly side of india.

I'm not alone finally. She still don't know to speak proper Hindi. She acts with a flat face, but still People like her for her White skin :mad:

Indians like to see good locations, Foreigners like to see real and unmasked poor India, since Octopussy days
 

ajayritik

Technomancer
@ harry10 since you were watching Dhoom 3 on TV I thought we have an option to not watch it in case you didn't like it unless you are watching in a theater
 

adityak469

Training To Beat Goku
I can't seem to understand why would critics compare Haider with bang bang? Like they are worlds apart. Haider is a serious movie with good story and good execution and bang bang is just shitload of nonsensical stuff.

And I'm pretty sure that BB would earn more than Haider because **** logic and because its Bollywood.
 

icebags

Technomancer
Watched Million Dollar Arm (2014)...

Music : A.R. Rahman

Based on True Events...also shoot in India...!!!

Don't Miss it..!!!

Rinku Singh and Dinesh Patel.
The first Indian national ever to sign a contract with a major American sports club.

good job, its an interesting movie none the less, putting aside stereotype image of india in the west.

:) go watch it without any hesitation.
 
Top Bottom