Liverpool_fan
Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
I am still curious though. Not that I'll buy the book.
Mystery of Zero Resolved
Arsenal_Gunners
Human Spambot
At best it is a case of
Mathematical fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh,and local media has zero credibility.
Mathematical fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh,and local media has zero credibility.
sygeek
Technomancer
0/0 = 0/0 <=> Nothing/nothing = nothing/nothing
Nothing is nothing, thus it doesn't make sense to divide it, the answer thus is nothing (on both the sides).
Now,
Nothing = Nothing <=> 0=0
Nothing is nothing, we all know that. Thus, this equation doesn't exist and it is nothing.
0=0 => 0 => Nothing
What did I just say? Nothing..
Nothing is nothing, thus it doesn't make sense to divide it, the answer thus is nothing (on both the sides).
Now,
Nothing = Nothing <=> 0=0
Nothing is nothing, we all know that. Thus, this equation doesn't exist and it is nothing.
0=0 => 0 => Nothing
What did I just say? Nothing..
tkin
Back to school!!
I want to kill myself.
Liverpool_fan
Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
Sure go ahead. Your vital signs will indicate the very number.
sygeek
Technomancer
A giant step towards the betterment of the society.
OP
KDroid
Cyborg Agent
B.N.R.F. - B.N.R.F.
look at the formula. he says for X/Y, A=(X/2)[1/Y'+1/Y"] where Y' is the largest decimal no. before Y and Y" is the smallest decimal no. after Y.
In that case the number's decimal will go on till infinity in case of Y' and Y"!
For example, if Y=1, then Y'=0.9R (where R= recurring) and Y"=1.0000....001, where there are an infinite number of 0s before the decimal 1.
Thus, his formula is BS.
He should stop that nonsense immediately.
Unless Stephen Hawking can prove it otherwise, I dont believe it.
look at the formula. he says for X/Y, A=(X/2)[1/Y'+1/Y"] where Y' is the largest decimal no. before Y and Y" is the smallest decimal no. after Y.
In that case the number's decimal will go on till infinity in case of Y' and Y"!
For example, if Y=1, then Y'=0.9R (where R= recurring) and Y"=1.0000....001, where there are an infinite number of 0s before the decimal 1.
Thus, his formula is BS.
He should stop that nonsense immediately.
Unless Stephen Hawking can prove it otherwise, I dont believe it.
Zangetsu
I am the master of my Fate.
the website is crap made in mspaint i guess....
& its not some people but all people....
limits,calculus,integration mathematician ghost will be crying out for ruining their effort...
& to reveal the secret we have to spend rs250..this is all @$232!!@#
ssk_the_gr8
Make Way the LORD is Here
Hillarious!!
Btw, is anyone ready to shell out Rs.250 for a 18-page book?
it's an 18 page book
... never!
Zangetsu
I am the master of my Fate.
it's an 18 page book
its a money making business & nothing else
ssk_the_gr8
Make Way the LORD is Here
Prime_Coder
I'm a Wannabe Hacker
Btw, is anyone ready to shell out Rs.250 for a 18-page book?
Who is going to buy such things? Prove the same thing to the seller of the book and say to give it for 0 rupees..
Liverpool_fan
Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
In fact 0.9R = 1 (try converting 0.9R into fraction)
And a 0.0000...1 isn't a number anyway (we're not talking of limits).
Weird "formula". BS IMO.
EDIT: He is not talking in terms of repetends though,,it won't be 0.9R
He just has to prove, 1/Y' + 1/Y'' = 2/Y. Has he actually done that? And how does this "new" formula help in solving problems, I wonder.
Btw, is anyone ready to shell out Rs.250 for a 18-page book?
Nope. Taking out pictures is easier and cheaper as well, if you are so inclined.
abhijangda
Padawan
ha ha ha ha
just can't stop laughing after reading this article.
This boy is a big BS.
just can't stop laughing after reading this article.
This boy is a big BS.
thetechfreak
Legend Never Ends
The formala is wrong. The souls of Archimedes and all others will be crying.
A very funny comment
Really?
A very funny comment